ASML
Price
$1929.68
Change
+$61.85 (+3.31%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
743.28B
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CAMT
Price
$195.16
Change
+$17.02 (+9.55%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
8.99B
46 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASML vs CAMT

ASML vs CAMT Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? ASML Holding N.V. (ASML) vs. Camtek Ltd. (CAMT) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • ASML dominates extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography with near-monopoly status, fueling long-term AI chip demand, while CAMT excels in metrology for advanced packaging.
  • Both stocks show robust YTD gains—ASML at 46.56% and CAMT at 65.56%—outpacing broader markets amid semiconductor sector momentum.
  • Recent market activity reflects volatility: ASML hit 52-week highs near $1,595 before pulling back, while CAMT surged post-Q1 earnings beat but faced intraday pressure.
  • ASML's larger scale ($603B market cap) contrasts with CAMT's nimbler growth ($8.2B), offering different risk-reward profiles in the chip equipment space.
  • Sentiment drivers include EUV adoption for ASML and advanced packaging demand for CAMT, with export restrictions posing headwinds for both.

Introduction

In the high-stakes semiconductor equipment sector, ASML and CAMT represent complementary players powering advanced chip production. ASML, the leader in lithography systems essential for cutting-edge nodes, contrasts with CAMT's focus on inspection and metrology tools critical for yield optimization in advanced packaging. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and growth drivers amid surging AI and data center demand. Traders seeking exposure to semiconductor supply chain momentum, from front-end fabrication to backend assembly, will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and sector tailwinds.

ASML Overview and Recent Performance

ASML Holding N.V., headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, specializes in lithography, metrology, and inspection systems for semiconductor manufacturing. As the sole provider of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines—crucial for sub-7nm nodes—it holds a near-monopoly in advanced tools demanded by foundries like TSMC. In recent market activity, ASML's shares reached 52-week highs above $1,595, reflecting AI-driven chip demand, before retracing amid broader sector volatility. Year-to-date returns stand at 46.56%, with a 1-year gain of 123.46%, underscoring sustained momentum. Sentiment has been buoyed by Low-NA EUV adoption and Q1 2026 results showing €8.8 billion in net sales, though tempered by U.S.-China export restrictions on advanced tech. CEO comments affirming controlled tech exports have stabilized views, positioning ASML for long-term growth in AI enablers.

CAMT Overview and Recent Performance

Camtek Ltd., based in Migdal HaEmek, Israel, develops inspection and metrology equipment tailored for the semiconductor industry, including platforms like Eagle and Hawk for 2D/3D analysis in advanced packaging and wafers. Serving OSATs (outsourced semiconductor assembly and test) and IDMs (integrated device manufacturers), it supports yield enhancement in memory, CMOS image sensors, and RF segments. Recent weeks saw CAMT hit new highs near $216 post-Q1 2026 earnings, which beat estimates with $121.7 million revenue and $35.3 million net income, guiding higher for the year. YTD performance reached 65.56%, outpacing ASML, with 1-year returns at 154.44%, driven by advanced packaging tailwinds. Intraday volatility followed, with shares dipping amid profit-taking, yet market cap holds near $8.2 billion. Demand for metrology in 3D stacking and heterogeneous integration bolsters sentiment, despite geopolitical risks in Israel.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Out of 351 total AI bots, AI analysis identifies 25+ trending ones as the most promising for current environments, emphasizing momentum, sector rotation, and outperforming the market in growth areas like technology and semiconductors. These bots feature varying styles—such as pattern recognition with 70-80% win rates or annualized returns up to 227% in select portfolios—along with profit factors exceeding 2.5. Optimized for today's volatile conditions, they offer copy trading for retail and institutional users. Explore Trending AI Robots to evaluate stats and deploy suitable agents.

Head-to-Head Comparison

ASML and CAMT operate in the semiconductor equipment value chain, but diverge in business models: ASML's capital-intensive EUV systems ($200M+ per unit) target front-end logic/memory fabs, while CAMT's metrology tools focus on backend inspection for packaging. Growth drivers align on AI but differ—ASML via node shrinks (High-NA EUV), CAMT through 3D stacking proliferation. Recent momentum favors CAMT's sharper YTD surge (65% vs. 47%), but ASML offers scale stability ($603B vs. $8B market cap). Risks include export curbs for both (China exposure), with CAMT's higher beta (1.62 vs. 1.37) amplifying volatility. Sector exposure is pure-play semis; sentiment tilts toward ASML's moat amid EUV monopoly, versus CAMT's niche agility.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI leans toward ASML in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency from EUV dominance and AI catalysts, alongside lower relative volatility despite recent pullbacks. CAMT's earnings momentum and packaging upside present probabilistic edges for shorter horizons, but ASML's market positioning offers higher conviction for sustained outperformance amid sector rotation.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
ASML vs. CAMT commentary
Jun 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASML is a Hold and CAMT is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 20, 2026
Stock price -- (ASML: $1929.68 vs. CAMT: $195.16)
Brand notoriety: ASML and CAMT are both not notable
Both companies represent the Electronic Production Equipment industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASML: 128% vs. CAMT: 64%
Market capitalization -- ASML: $743.28B vs. CAMT: $8.99B
ASML [@Electronic Production Equipment] is valued at $743.28B. CAMT’s [@Electronic Production Equipment] market capitalization is $8.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry ranges from $743.28B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Electronic Production Equipment] industry is $78.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCAMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • ASML’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • CAMT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASML is a better buy in the long-term than CAMT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASML’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASML’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CAMT’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CAMT is a better buy in the short-term than ASML.

Price Growth

ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while CAMT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +5.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +9.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.

CAMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Electronic Production Equipment (+9.74% weekly)

The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASML($743B) has a higher market cap than CAMT($8.99B). CAMT has higher P/E ratio than ASML: CAMT (201.20) vs ASML (64.28). CAMT (83.516) and ASML (81.241) have similar YTD gains . ASML has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 11.9B vs. CAMT (48.6M). ASML has more cash in the bank: 8.38B vs. CAMT (670M). CAMT has less debt than ASML: CAMT (488M) vs ASML (2.71B). ASML has higher revenues than CAMT: ASML (33.7B) vs CAMT (499M).
ASMLCAMTASML / CAMT
Capitalization743B8.99B8,268%
EBITDA11.9B48.6M24,486%
Gain YTD81.24183.51697%
P/E Ratio64.28201.2032%
Revenue33.7B499M6,754%
Total Cash8.38B670M1,250%
Total Debt2.71B488M555%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASML vs CAMT: Fundamental Ratings
ASML
CAMT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4175
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
84
Overvalued
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1425
SMR RATING
1..100
1980
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3636
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
102
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7590

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASML's Valuation (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (85). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (25). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAMT (80). This means that ASML’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAMT’s over the last 12 months.

ASML's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (36). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.

CAMT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (10). This means that CAMT’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASMLCAMT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
85%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 25 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
58%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
75%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASML
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CAMT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HROW42.870.93
+2.22%
Harrow
NODK15.910.18
+1.14%
NI Holdings
TPISX15.850.12
+0.76%
Nuveen Quant Intl Small Cap Eq Premier
THGCX29.980.17
+0.57%
Thornburg International Equity C
GAME0.43N/A
-0.02%
GameSquare Holdings

CAMT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAMT has been closely correlated with NVMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAMT jumps, then NVMI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CAMT
1D Price
Change %
CAMT100%
+9.55%
NVMI - CAMT
76%
Closely correlated
+3.77%
AMAT - CAMT
73%
Closely correlated
+4.08%
KLAC - CAMT
73%
Closely correlated
+8.73%
ONTO - CAMT
71%
Closely correlated
+4.65%
LRCX - CAMT
70%
Closely correlated
+3.97%
More