In the high-stakes semiconductor equipment sector, ASML and CAMT represent complementary players powering advanced chip production. ASML, the leader in lithography systems essential for cutting-edge nodes, contrasts with CAMT's focus on inspection and metrology tools critical for yield optimization in advanced packaging. This stock comparison analyzes their recent market positioning, performance, and growth drivers amid surging AI and data center demand. Traders seeking exposure to semiconductor supply chain momentum, from front-end fabrication to backend assembly, will find insights into relative strengths, risks, and sector tailwinds.
ASML Holding N.V., headquartered in Veldhoven, Netherlands, specializes in lithography, metrology, and inspection systems for semiconductor manufacturing. As the sole provider of extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography machines—crucial for sub-7nm nodes—it holds a near-monopoly in advanced tools demanded by foundries like TSMC. In recent market activity, ASML's shares reached 52-week highs above $1,595, reflecting AI-driven chip demand, before retracing amid broader sector volatility. Year-to-date returns stand at 46.56%, with a 1-year gain of 123.46%, underscoring sustained momentum. Sentiment has been buoyed by Low-NA EUV adoption and Q1 2026 results showing €8.8 billion in net sales, though tempered by U.S.-China export restrictions on advanced tech. CEO comments affirming controlled tech exports have stabilized views, positioning ASML for long-term growth in AI enablers.
Camtek Ltd., based in Migdal HaEmek, Israel, develops inspection and metrology equipment tailored for the semiconductor industry, including platforms like Eagle and Hawk for 2D/3D analysis in advanced packaging and wafers. Serving OSATs (outsourced semiconductor assembly and test) and IDMs (integrated device manufacturers), it supports yield enhancement in memory, CMOS image sensors, and RF segments. Recent weeks saw CAMT hit new highs near $216 post-Q1 2026 earnings, which beat estimates with $121.7 million revenue and $35.3 million net income, guiding higher for the year. YTD performance reached 65.56%, outpacing ASML, with 1-year returns at 154.44%, driven by advanced packaging tailwinds. Intraday volatility followed, with shares dipping amid profit-taking, yet market cap holds near $8.2 billion. Demand for metrology in 3D stacking and heterogeneous integration bolsters sentiment, despite geopolitical risks in Israel.
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's top-performing AI trading bots, drawn from hundreds available that trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. Out of 351 total AI bots, AI analysis identifies 25+ trending ones as the most promising for current environments, emphasizing momentum, sector rotation, and outperforming the market in growth areas like technology and semiconductors. These bots feature varying styles—such as pattern recognition with 70-80% win rates or annualized returns up to 227% in select portfolios—along with profit factors exceeding 2.5. Optimized for today's volatile conditions, they offer copy trading for retail and institutional users. Explore Trending AI Robots to evaluate stats and deploy suitable agents.
ASML and CAMT operate in the semiconductor equipment value chain, but diverge in business models: ASML's capital-intensive EUV systems ($200M+ per unit) target front-end logic/memory fabs, while CAMT's metrology tools focus on backend inspection for packaging. Growth drivers align on AI but differ—ASML via node shrinks (High-NA EUV), CAMT through 3D stacking proliferation. Recent momentum favors CAMT's sharper YTD surge (65% vs. 47%), but ASML offers scale stability ($603B vs. $8B market cap). Risks include export curbs for both (China exposure), with CAMT's higher beta (1.62 vs. 1.37) amplifying volatility. Sector exposure is pure-play semis; sentiment tilts toward ASML's moat amid EUV monopoly, versus CAMT's niche agility.
Tickeron’s AI leans toward ASML in the current environment, citing superior trend consistency from EUV dominance and AI catalysts, alongside lower relative volatility despite recent pullbacks. CAMT's earnings momentum and packaging upside present probabilistic edges for shorter horizons, but ASML's market positioning offers higher conviction for sustained outperformance amid sector rotation.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASML’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileCAMT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASML’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CAMT’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
ASML (@Electronic Production Equipment) experienced а +1.59% price change this week, while CAMT (@Electronic Production Equipment) price change was +5.98% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Electronic Production Equipment industry was +9.74%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +154.84%.
ASML is expected to report earnings on Jul 15, 2026.
CAMT is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.
The electronic production equipment industry makes equipment used to produce semiconductors. Such equipment includes wafer fabrication, plasma etching and photo-resist processing equipment. The industry also makes chemical vapor deposition processing systems and photomasks, which are high-purity quartz plates that contain patterns to define integrated circuits layouts. Applied Materials, Inc., Lam Research Corporation, and KLA-Tencor Corporation are examples of electronic production equipment manufacturing companies.
| ASML | CAMT | ASML / CAMT | |
| Capitalization | 743B | 8.99B | 8,268% |
| EBITDA | 11.9B | 48.6M | 24,486% |
| Gain YTD | 81.241 | 83.516 | 97% |
| P/E Ratio | 64.28 | 201.20 | 32% |
| Revenue | 33.7B | 499M | 6,754% |
| Total Cash | 8.38B | 670M | 1,250% |
| Total Debt | 2.71B | 488M | 555% |
ASML | CAMT | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 41 | 75 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 84 Overvalued | 85 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 14 | 25 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 10 | 2 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 90 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ASML's Valuation (84) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (85). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (25). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's SMR Rating (19) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CAMT (80). This means that ASML’s stock grew somewhat faster than CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
ASML's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as CAMT (36). This means that ASML’s stock grew similarly to CAMT’s over the last 12 months.
CAMT's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Electronic Production Equipment industry is in the same range as ASML (10). This means that CAMT’s stock grew similarly to ASML’s over the last 12 months.
| ASML | CAMT | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 66% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 81% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 83% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 76% | 3 days ago 85% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 73% | 6 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 25 days ago 66% | 4 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% | N/A |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CAMT has been closely correlated with NVMI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CAMT jumps, then NVMI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CAMT | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAMT | 100% | +9.55% | ||
| NVMI - CAMT | 76% Closely correlated | +3.77% | ||
| AMAT - CAMT | 73% Closely correlated | +4.08% | ||
| KLAC - CAMT | 73% Closely correlated | +8.73% | ||
| ONTO - CAMT | 71% Closely correlated | +4.65% | ||
| LRCX - CAMT | 70% Closely correlated | +3.97% | ||
More | ||||