Advertisement
ASO vs CGTL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASO is a Buy and CGTL is a Hold.
| ASO | CGTL | ASO / CGTL | |
| Capitalization | 3.41B | 6.64M | 51,386% |
| EBITDA | 652M | -13.14M | -4,961% |
| Gain YTD | 11.460 | -77.619 | -15% |
| P/E Ratio | 9.29 | 2.64 | 352% |
| Revenue | 6.14B | 21.2M | 28,981% |
| Total Cash | 338M | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 1.95B | 18.7K | 10,433,155% |
ASO | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 32 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 41 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 68 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| ASO | CGTL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 83% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 86% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 74% | 17 days ago 87% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 87% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ASO’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green while CGTL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- ASO’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CGTL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ASO’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CGTL’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ASO’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- CGTL’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
ASO (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +23.19% price change this week, while CGTL (@Specialty Stores) price change was -7.95% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -4.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.27%, and the average quarterly price growth was -0.74%.
Reported Earning Dates
ASO is expected to report earnings on Dec 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-4.09% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SPXV | 83.89 | 0.83 | +1.01% |
| ProShares S&P 500® ex-Health Care | |||
| IDEF | 31.63 | 0.19 | +0.60% |
| iShares Defense Indstr and TechActiveETF | |||
| QCLR | 27.62 | 0.11 | +0.41% |
| Global X NASDAQ 100® Collar 95-110 ETF | |||
| ENFR | 39.54 | -0.17 | -0.43% |
| Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | |||
| CORN | 19.92 | -0.09 | -0.45% |
| Teucrium Corn Fund | |||
CGTL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that CGTL and BBY have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CGTL and BBY's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CGTL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CGTL | 100% | -0.87% | ||
| BBY - CGTL | 21% Poorly correlated | +3.08% | ||
| NAAS - CGTL | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.31% | ||
| ASO - CGTL | 20% Poorly correlated | +2.11% | ||
| JBDI - CGTL | 14% Poorly correlated | -5.51% | ||
| PTLE - CGTL | 13% Poorly correlated | +2.29% | ||
More | ||||