Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
ASRCX vs CSFZX
ASRCX vs CSFZX Comparison
Open Charts ASRCX vs CSFZX
ASRCX vs CSFZX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
ASRCX vs. CSFZX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASRCX is a Hold and CSFZX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CSFZX has more cash in the bank: 2.38B vs. ASRCX (354M). CSFZX pays higher dividends than ASRCX: CSFZX (3.16) vs ASRCX (1.66). ASRCX was incepted earlier than CSFZX: ASRCX (19 years) vs CSFZX (12 years). ASRCX (2.01) is less costly to investors than CSFZX (0.84). ASRCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 105.00 vs. CSFZX (57.00). CSFZX has a lower initial minimum investment than ASRCX: CSFZX (0) vs ASRCX (1000). CSFZX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.21 vs. ASRCX (13.46). CSFZX return over 5 years is better than : 7.97 vs. ASRCX (2.38).
| ASRCX | CSFZX | ASRCX / CSFZX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.84 | 239% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 2.01 | 0.84 | 239% |
| Fund Existence | 19 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.916 | 11.255 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 354M | 2.38B | 15% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.66 | 3.16 | 53% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.46 | 14.21 | 95% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.66 | 34.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.38 | 7.97 | 30% |
| Returns for 10 years | 24.27 | 50.53 | 48% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers