ATER
Price
$1.30
Change
-$0.02 (-1.52%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
14.12M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CRWS
Price
$2.78
Change
+$0.04 (+1.46%)
Updated
Jun 23 closing price
Capitalization
29.74M
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATER vs CRWS

ATER vs CRWS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ATER vs. CRWS commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATER is a Hold and CRWS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ATER: $1.30 vs. CRWS: $2.78)
Brand notoriety: ATER and CRWS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Home Furnishings industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATER: 1% vs. CRWS: 56%
Market capitalization -- ATER: $14.12M vs. CRWS: $29.74M
ATER [@Home Furnishings] is valued at $14.12M. CRWS’s [@Home Furnishings] market capitalization is $29.74M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Home Furnishings] industry ranges from $27.62B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Home Furnishings] industry is $1.98B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATER’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCRWS’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ATER’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • CRWS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CRWS is a better buy in the long-term than ATER.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATER’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CRWS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATER’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CRWS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATER is a better buy in the short-term than CRWS.

Price Growth

ATER (@Home Furnishings) experienced а +3.57% price change this week, while CRWS (@Home Furnishings) price change was +0.72% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Home Furnishings industry was +1.03%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

CRWS is expected to report earnings on Jun 24, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Home Furnishings (+1.03% weekly)

The home furnishings industry includes companies that sell items like furniture, appliances, rugs, cooking utensils, and art objects. According to Mordor Intelligence, the U.S. home decor market is estimated to grow at CAGR 7.5% between 2019 and 2024. The market is being increasingly penetrated by e-commerce and m-commerce, while growing urbanization, and, consumers’ rising interest towards home decor are driving demand for the industry. Mohawk Industries, Inc., La-Z-Boy Incorporated, Leggett & Platt, Incorporated are some of the prominent companies in this space. Being usually discretionary for consumers, demand for furnishings could be affected by macroeconomic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CRWS($29.7M) has a higher market cap than ATER($14.1M). ATER YTD gains are higher at: 87.635 vs. CRWS (6.210). CRWS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.43M vs. ATER (-16.37M). ATER has more cash in the bank: 2.32M vs. CRWS (1.59M). ATER has less debt than CRWS: ATER (2.9M) vs CRWS (26.5M). CRWS has higher revenues than ATER: CRWS (83.1M) vs ATER (68.9M).
ATERCRWSATER / CRWS
Capitalization14.1M29.7M47%
EBITDA-16.37M6.43M-255%
Gain YTD87.6356.2101,411%
P/E RatioN/A11.83-
Revenue68.9M83.1M83%
Total Cash2.32M1.59M146%
Total Debt2.9M26.5M11%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATER vs CRWS: Fundamental Ratings
ATER
CRWS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3994
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
31
Undervalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9997
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3650
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10042
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CRWS's Valuation (3) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (31) in the null industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's SMR Rating (97) in the Home Furnishings industry is in the same range as ATER (99) in the null industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew similarly to ATER’s over the last 12 months.

ATER's Price Growth Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as CRWS (50) in the Home Furnishings industry. This means that ATER’s stock grew similarly to CRWS’s over the last 12 months.

CRWS's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Home Furnishings industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATER (100) in the null industry. This means that CRWS’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATER’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATERCRWS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
45%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
47%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
45%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
58%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATER
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CRWS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ABT90.532.70
+3.07%
Abbott Laboratories
IMTX9.910.13
+1.33%
Immatics NV
BRT14.900.04
+0.27%
BRT Apartments Corp
CHYM16.64-0.28
-1.65%
Chime Financial Inc
SLGB0.64-0.02
-3.03%
Smart Logistics Global Ltd

ATER and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ATER and CRWS have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ATER and CRWS's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ATER
1D Price
Change %
ATER100%
-1.14%
CRWS - ATER
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.46%
ETD - ATER
23%
Poorly correlated
+1.55%
LEG - ATER
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
VIRC - ATER
21%
Poorly correlated
+0.98%
SN - ATER
21%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

CRWS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CRWS and NTZ have been poorly correlated (+28% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CRWS and NTZ's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CRWS
1D Price
Change %
CRWS100%
+1.46%
NTZ - CRWS
28%
Poorly correlated
+4.19%
MLKN - CRWS
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
MBC - CRWS
24%
Poorly correlated
-3.02%
HNI - CRWS
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ATER - CRWS
23%
Poorly correlated
-1.14%
More