ATO
Price
$169.92
Change
-$0.04 (-0.02%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
28.71B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
NJR
Price
$55.60
Change
+$0.06 (+0.11%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
5.64B
89 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ATO vs NJR

ATO vs NJR Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Jul 26, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Atmos Energy (ATO) vs. New Jersey Resources (NJR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Scale and Scope: ATO is a $29 billion pure-play regulated natural gas distributor serving 3.4 million customers, while NJR is a $5.9 billion diversified energy services holding company with utility, clean energy, storage, and wholesale marketing segments.
  • Profitability Profile: ATO delivers a substantially higher net margin of approximately 27.6% versus NJR's 15.7%, reflecting the efficiency of its regulated monopoly operations, though NJR generates a stronger return on equity (ROE) at roughly 14.6% compared with ATO's 9.6%.
  • Dividend Strength: ATO has raised its dividend for 41 consecutive years (yielding ~2.3%), while NJR has a higher current yield (~3.3%) and 30 consecutive years of dividend increases.
  • Recent Momentum: NJR has outpaced ATO on a trailing one-year basis, posting roughly a 27% return compared with ATO's 16%, partly reflecting Mizuho's December 2025 upgrade of NJR to Outperform and Morgan Stanley's downgrade of ATO to Equalweight.
  • Risk and Diversification: ATO's concentrated natural gas utility model offers predictability but less diversification, while NJR's multi-segment structure — including solar energy and wholesale gas marketing — introduces both growth optionality and earnings variability.
  • Institutional Confidence: ATO enjoys 90.2% institutional ownership versus NJR's 71%, signaling stronger conviction among large asset managers, though both stocks exhibit low beta — ATO at 0.6 and NJR at 0.5 — indicating defensive characteristics relative to the broader market.

Introduction

Investors seeking exposure to the regulated natural gas utility space often encounter two distinct profiles: the large-cap, pure-play distributor and the mid-cap, diversified energy services company. ATO (Atmos Energy Corporation) and NJR (New Jersey Resources Corporation) represent precisely this contrast. Both operate within the gas utilities sector and share a commitment to steady dividend growth, yet their business models, geographic footprints, and growth strategies diverge meaningfully. This comparison examines how these two stocks stack up across financial metrics, recent performance, risk factors, and market positioning — offering a data-driven perspective for traders and long-term investors evaluating utility-sector opportunities in the current market environment.

ATO Overview and Recent Performance

Atmos Energy Corporation, headquartered in Dallas, Texas, is the largest pure-play natural gas distributor in the United States and a member of the S&P 500. The company delivers natural gas to approximately 3.4 million customers across more than 1,400 communities in eight states, primarily concentrated in the South. ATO also manages one of the largest intrastate natural gas pipeline systems in Texas, along with five underground storage facilities.

In recent months, ATO has demonstrated steady operational execution. The company reported fiscal 2025 earnings per diluted share (EPS) of $7.46 on net income of $1.2 billion, with capital expenditures (CapEx) reaching $3.6 billion — approximately 87% of which was directed toward safety and reliability improvements. Management initiated fiscal 2026 EPS guidance in the range of $8.15 to $8.35 and raised the quarterly dividend to $1.00 per share, representing a 14.9% year-over-year increase. The company also unveiled a $26 billion five-year capital investment plan spanning fiscal 2026 through 2030, underscoring its commitment to infrastructure modernization.

Stock performance has reflected this operational momentum, though some Wall Street analysts have tempered near-term enthusiasm. In December 2025, Morgan Stanley downgraded ATO from Overweight to Equalweight, citing limited upside after the stock's strong outperformance relative to gas utility peers. Mizuho maintained a Neutral rating. Despite the cautious analyst tone, ATO continues to benefit from favorable regulatory mechanisms in Texas that support timely capital cost recovery, a factor that underpins its consistent earnings growth and 41-year dividend increase streak.

NJR Overview and Recent Performance

New Jersey Resources Corporation, based in Wall, New Jersey, operates as a diversified energy services holding company with four primary business segments: Natural Gas Distribution (New Jersey Natural Gas, or NJNG), Clean Energy Ventures (CEV), Energy Services (ES), and Storage and Transportation (S&T). NJNG serves approximately 588,000 customers in New Jersey's most populous counties, while CEV has grown into one of the largest solar developers in the state. The Energy Services segment participates in wholesale and retail natural gas markets, and S&T manages pipeline and storage assets including the Leaf River Energy Center.

NJR closed fiscal 2025 with net financial earnings per share (NFEPS), a non-GAAP (non-Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) measure that adjusts for certain items, of $3.29 — reaching the high end of its raised guidance range. This marked the fifth consecutive year the company surpassed its initial annual NFEPS guidance. CEV placed a record 93 megawatts of solar capacity into service during the year, while NJNG invested a record $98 million in its SAVEGREEN energy efficiency program. For fiscal 2026, management introduced NFEPS guidance of $3.03 to $3.18 and outlined a roughly $5 billion five-year capital plan, approximately 60% of which is earmarked for the regulated utility business.

NJR shares have experienced notable upward momentum in recent months. In December 2025, Mizuho upgraded the stock from Neutral to Outperform, and the company's one-year trailing return has outpaced many peers in the gas utility space. NJR's diversified model — spanning regulated utility earnings, solar development, gas storage, and wholesale marketing — generates multiple avenues for growth, though it also introduces quarterly earnings variability that differs from the steadier profile of a pure regulated utility.

Trending AI Robots

In a market environment where data moves faster than ever, traders are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence to help identify opportunities and manage risk. Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of the platform's hundreds of AI-powered trading bots, each designed to trade specific tickers and strategies. Only the highest-performing and most market-relevant robots earn a place in this section at any given time. These AI trading bots span various trading styles — from short-term 5-minute and 15-minute agents to longer-duration 60-minute strategies — and they trade across stocks, ETFs, forex, and cryptocurrencies. Performance statistics among featured bots have shown annualized returns ranging from approximately 75% to well over 300% under certain market conditions, with transparent tracking of metrics such as Sharpe ratio, profit factor, win rate, and maximum drawdown. Whether you are exploring systematic, data-driven trading or simply looking for an edge in stock selection, the Trending AI Robots page offers a window into how AI is reshaping modern trading.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Business Model: ATO operates as a pure-play regulated natural gas utility with a transmission and storage complement, generating nearly all revenue from rate-regulated distribution. NJR combines a regulated utility (contributing roughly 65-70% of earnings) with unregulated businesses in solar energy, wholesale gas marketing, and midstream storage — creating a more varied earnings mix but also greater exposure to commodity price swings.

Scale and Financials: ATO's $29 billion market capitalization dwarfs NJR's $5.9 billion. ATO generated $4.7 billion in revenue and $1.2 billion in net income in fiscal 2025, compared with NJR's $2.0 billion in revenue and $335.6 million in net income. ATO commands a noticeably wider net margin (27.6% versus 15.7%), though NJR's ROE of 14.6% exceeds ATO's 9.6%, reflecting NJR's more leveraged capital structure and asset mix.

Valuation: ATO trades at a higher forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of approximately 19.7, reflecting a premium valuation the market assigns to its scale, consistency, and Texas-centric regulatory advantages. NJR trades at a more modest forward P/E of roughly 16.9, offering a lower entry multiple alongside a higher dividend yield of about 3.3% versus ATO's 2.3%.

Growth Drivers: ATO's growth thesis rests on population migration to its Sunbelt service territories, substantial infrastructure investment, and constructive rate regulation in Texas. NJR's growth narrative is broader: utility rate base expansion in New Jersey, solar capacity additions through CEV, storage capacity expansion at Leaf River, and opportunistic gains from natural gas market volatility through its Energy Services segment.

Risk Factors: ATO's concentrated geographic and regulatory exposure means adverse rate decisions in Texas or a sharp slowdown in customer growth could disproportionately affect results. NJR faces regulatory risk in New Jersey — a state with ambitious decarbonization goals — as well as earnings variability tied to solar project timelines, weather patterns, and natural gas price fluctuations affecting its unregulated segments.

Market Sentiment: Recent analyst actions highlight the divergence: Morgan Stanley's downgrade of ATO signaled that much of its premium may already be priced in, while Mizuho's upgrade of NJR pointed to perceived upside potential. Both stocks exhibit low beta — ATO at 0.6, NJR at 0.5 — reinforcing their appeal as defensive holdings during periods of broader market turbulence.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, earnings stability, institutional sponsorship, and scale advantages, Tickeron's AI analytical framework would likely favor ATO in a head-to-head evaluation at this juncture. ATO's 90.2% institutional ownership, wider net margins, massive $26 billion capital investment pipeline, and 41-year track record of consecutive dividend increases signal a higher-confidence pattern of operational predictability — attributes that pattern-recognition models tend to reward. NJR's diversified model, while offering compelling value at a lower P/E multiple and a richer dividend yield, introduces greater quarter-to-quarter earnings variability that can generate noisier trend signals. That said, NJR's stronger trailing one-year performance and recent analyst upgrades suggest it may offer greater near-term upside potential for investors willing to accept a more complex earnings profile. The AI-driven assessment emphasizes relative stability and consistency; under different market conditions that favor momentum or value, the ranking could shift.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
ATO vs. NJR commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ATO is a StrongBuy and NJR is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (ATO: $169.92 vs. NJR: $55.60)
Brand notoriety: ATO and NJR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Gas Distributors industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ATO: 94% vs. NJR: 53%
Market capitalization -- ATO: $28.71B vs. NJR: $5.64B
ATO [@Gas Distributors] is valued at $28.71B. NJR’s [@Gas Distributors] market capitalization is $5.64B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Gas Distributors] industry ranges from $29.88B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Gas Distributors] industry is $6.45B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ATO’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileNJR’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • ATO’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • NJR’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, NJR is a better buy in the long-term than ATO.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ATO’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NJR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ATO’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • NJR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ATO is a better buy in the short-term than NJR.

Price Growth

ATO (@Gas Distributors) experienced а -0.16% price change this week, while NJR (@Gas Distributors) price change was +1.05% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Gas Distributors industry was +0.06%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

ATO is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

NJR is expected to report earnings on Nov 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Gas Distributors (+0.06% weekly)

Gas distributors are involved in moving and selling gas – from wellheads or over-distribution systems operated by other firms – to residential and non-residential customers. These companies perform tasks such as the gathering and processing of gas, intrastate and interstate transport, and delivery to the customer. Some of the biggest gas distributing companies in the U.S. include Sempra Energy, Avangrid Inc and Atmos Energy Corporation.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ATO($28.7B) has a higher market cap than NJR($5.64B). ATO has higher P/E ratio than NJR: ATO (20.25) vs NJR (15.40). NJR YTD gains are higher at: 22.679 vs. ATO (2.506). ATO has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 2.59B vs. NJR (760M). NJR has less debt than ATO: NJR (3.77B) vs ATO (9.63B). ATO has higher revenues than NJR: ATO (4.88B) vs NJR (2.18B).
ATONJRATO / NJR
Capitalization28.7B5.64B509%
EBITDA2.59B760M341%
Gain YTD2.50622.67911%
P/E Ratio20.2515.40131%
Revenue4.88B2.18B224%
Total Cash126MN/A-
Total Debt9.63B3.77B256%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ATO vs NJR: Fundamental Ratings
ATO
NJR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6463
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
59
Fair valued
21
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
829
SMR RATING
1..100
7362
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5956
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6324
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NJR's Valuation (21) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATO (59). This means that NJR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATO’s over the last 12 months.

ATO's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as NJR (29). This means that ATO’s stock grew similarly to NJR’s over the last 12 months.

NJR's SMR Rating (62) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as ATO (73). This means that NJR’s stock grew similarly to ATO’s over the last 12 months.

NJR's Price Growth Rating (56) in the Gas Distributors industry is in the same range as ATO (59). This means that NJR’s stock grew similarly to ATO’s over the last 12 months.

NJR's P/E Growth Rating (24) in the Gas Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ATO (63). This means that NJR’s stock grew somewhat faster than ATO’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ATONJR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
43%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
48%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
41%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
35%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
40%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ATO
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
NJR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MANU24.190.87
+3.73%
Manchester United PLC
MRT1.800.04
+2.27%
Marti Technologies
EC17.17-0.04
-0.23%
Ecopetrol SA
NAVI9.17-0.07
-0.76%
Navient Corp
GXAI0.83-0.43
-34.13%
Gaxosai

NJR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NJR has been closely correlated with OGS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NJR jumps, then OGS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NJR
1D Price
Change %
NJR100%
+0.11%
OGS - NJR
70%
Closely correlated
-0.04%
CPK - NJR
68%
Closely correlated
-0.18%
SR - NJR
66%
Closely correlated
-0.11%
NWN - NJR
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
ATO - NJR
63%
Loosely correlated
-0.02%
More