AU
Price
$104.34
Change
-$4.00 (-3.69%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
52.75B
91 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FNV
Price
$236.97
Change
-$0.62 (-0.26%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
45.82B
Earnings call today
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AU vs FNV

Header iconAU vs FNV Comparison
Open Charts AU vs FNVBanner chart's image
AU vs FNV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? AngloGold Ashanti (AU) vs. Franco-Nevada (FNV) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AU shares trade around $107 with strong YTD gains of 27.61%, outperforming FNV's 11.63% amid robust Q1 earnings featuring record $1.2 billion free cash flow.
  • FNV, at approximately $232, offers stability as a royalty and streaming company, with a 1-year return of 41% but recent monthly dips of over 10%.
  • Both stocks benefit from elevated gold prices, but AU's operational leverage drove EPS of $2.52 in Q1 2026, beating estimates, while FNV awaits Q1 results on May 12.
  • AU shows higher volatility with a P/E of 15.72 versus FNV's 40.30, highlighting differing risk-reward profiles in the gold sector.
  • Recent momentum favors AU with 167% 1-year gains, contrasting FNV's steadier but lower 41% rise.

Introduction

This stock comparison examines AU (AngloGold Ashanti plc) and FNV (Franco-Nevada Corporation), two prominent players in the gold sector amid sustained high precious metal prices driven by geopolitical tensions and central bank demand. Gold miners like AU offer direct exposure to production upside, while royalty firms such as FNV provide leveraged revenue without operational risks. Traders seeking momentum and investors prioritizing stability will find value in analyzing their relative performance, valuations, and recent catalysts in today's volatile market environment. This review highlights key contrasts for informed decision-making on gold sector positioning.

AU Overview and Recent Performance

AngloGold Ashanti plc (AU) is a global gold producer with operations across Africa, Australia, and the Americas, including flagship assets like the Geita mine in Tanzania. In recent market activity, AU shares have demonstrated resilience, closing around $107 after a Q1 2026 earnings beat that featured record free cash flow of $1.2 billion and EBITDA of $2.3 billion, up 130% year-over-year. Gold production held steady at 724,000 ounces, supported by strong output from African and Brazilian sites despite asset sales. Sentiment has shifted positively on higher gold prices above $4,700 per ounce, a massive interim dividend of $585 million (116 cents per share), and a proposed $2 billion share repurchase, boosting YTD returns to 27.61% and 1-year gains to 167%. Trading at a forward P/E of around 15.72, AU reflects operational leverage amid cost pressures but strong cash generation.

FNV Overview and Recent Performance

Franco-Nevada Corporation (FNV) operates as a leading royalty and streaming company, deriving over 90% of revenues from precious metals like gold and silver across diverse global assets without direct mining costs. Shares hover near $232, with YTD performance at 11.63% and 1-year returns of 41%, though recent weeks saw a 10.74% monthly pullback amid gold price consolidation. Building on record 2025 results—including Q4 revenues up 86% to $597 million driven by Antamina and South Arturo—FNV anticipates Q1 2026 strength from 34% higher gold-equivalent ounces sold. Key developments include the 2026 Asset Handbook release and approvals for Cobre Panama stockpile processing, enhancing outlook. At a P/E of 40.30, valuation reflects lower risk and steady cash flows, with analysts upgrading to Buy on gold forecasts. Market sentiment remains supportive despite short-term volatility.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the top-performing AI trading bots from hundreds available, each designed to trade thousands of tickers using diverse strategies like momentum, sector rotation, and pattern recognition across timeframes from 15 minutes to daily. Selected from over 351 total bots, the 25 featured trending robots showcase impressive stats: annualized returns ranging from 23% to 285%, win rates of 51% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.70, targeting high-growth areas such as semiconductors, gold miners, space infrastructure, and leveraged ETFs. These bots adapt to current market conditions, delivering outsized gains like 167% annualized on nuclear/energy plays or 135% on AI-themed assets. Explore Tickeron’s AI tools to identify bots suited to your trading style and enhance performance in dynamic environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AU and FNV both capitalize on gold's rally, but diverge in business models: AU's mining operations yield higher revenue ($3.15 billion Q1) and growth potential through production ramps, while FNV's royalty model ensures predictable GEO-linked cash flows with minimal capex (AISC, or all-in sustaining costs, irrelevant for FNV). Recent momentum favors AU with superior YTD (28% vs. 12%) and 1-year returns (167% vs. 41%), driven by earnings beats and buybacks. Risk factors differ—AU faces operational hazards and cost inflation in Africa/Australia, versus FNV's counterparty and commodity price risks. Sector exposure overlaps in precious metals, but FNV diversifies into energy. Valuations show AU cheaper (P/E 15.72 vs. 40.30), with market sentiment tilting toward AU's catalysts amid gold's stability.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors AU over FNV, based on stronger trend consistency from recent earnings momentum, record free cash flow generation, and superior relative positioning with 167% 1-year gains versus FNV's 41%. AU's lower valuation and shareholder returns like the $2 billion buyback proposal signal higher probabilistic upside in a gold-supportive environment, though FNV offers greater stability ahead of its Q1 report.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AU vs. FNV commentary
May 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AU is a Hold and FNV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 13, 2026
Stock price -- (AU: $108.34 vs. FNV: $237.60)
Brand notoriety: AU and FNV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Precious Metals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AU: 80% vs. FNV: 99%
Market capitalization -- AU: $52.75B vs. FNV: $45.82B
AU [@Precious Metals] is valued at $52.75B. FNV’s [@Precious Metals] market capitalization is $45.82B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Precious Metals] industry ranges from $134.16B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Precious Metals] industry is $4.34B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AU’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileFNV’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AU’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • FNV’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the long-term than FNV.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AU’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FNV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AU’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FNV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AU is a better buy in the short-term than FNV.

Price Growth

AU (@Precious Metals) experienced а +19.46% price change this week, while FNV (@Precious Metals) price change was +6.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Precious Metals industry was +6.01%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +53.64%.

Reported Earning Dates

AU is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

FNV is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Precious Metals (+6.01% weekly)

The Precious Metals industry is engaged in exploring/mining metals that are considered to be rare and/or have a high economic value. Popular precious metals include gold, platinum and silver - all three of which are largely used in jewelry, art and coinage alongwith having some industrial uses as well. Precious metals used in industrial processes include iridium, (used in specialty alloys), and palladium ( used in electronics and chemical applications). Historically, precious metals have traded at much higher prices than common industrial metals. Newmont Goldcorp Corp, Barrick Gold Corp and Freeport-McMoRan are few of the major precious metals producing companies in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AU($52.8B) has a higher market cap than FNV($45.8B). FNV has higher P/E ratio than AU: FNV (41.25) vs AU (15.32). AU YTD gains are higher at: 29.175 vs. FNV (14.818). AU has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 5.76B vs. FNV (1.45B). AU has more cash in the bank: 3.15B vs. FNV (788M). FNV has less debt than AU: FNV (82.6M) vs AU (2.29B). AU has higher revenues than FNV: AU (11.2B) vs FNV (1.55B).
AUFNVAU / FNV
Capitalization52.8B45.8B115%
EBITDA5.76B1.45B397%
Gain YTD29.17514.818197%
P/E Ratio15.3241.2537%
Revenue11.2B1.55B724%
Total Cash3.15B788M400%
Total Debt2.29B82.6M2,768%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AU vs FNV: Fundamental Ratings
AU
FNV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7056
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
7
Undervalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2627
SMR RATING
1..100
2159
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3953
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2968
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
7565

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AU's Valuation (7) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (19). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Profit vs Risk Rating (26) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (27). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

AU's SMR Rating (21) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNV (59). This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNV’s over the last 12 months.

AU's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Precious Metals industry is in the same range as FNV (53). This means that AU’s stock grew similarly to FNV’s over the last 12 months.

AU's P/E Growth Rating (29) in the Precious Metals industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FNV (68). This means that AU’s stock grew somewhat faster than FNV’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUFNV
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AU
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FNV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SZK11.110.19
+1.74%
ProShares UltraShort Consumer Staples
SGOL45.090.10
+0.22%
abrdn Physical Gold Shares ETF
TOTR40.22-0.12
-0.31%
T. Rowe Price Total Return ETF
GSEU48.13-0.21
-0.43%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® Europe Eq ETF
WDGF32.08-0.17
-0.52%
WisdomTree Global Defense Fund