AUB
Price
$42.43
Change
+$0.15 (+0.35%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
6.02B
80 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DCOM
Price
$40.76
Change
-$0.04 (-0.10%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.8B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUB vs DCOM

AUB vs DCOM Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUB vs. DCOM commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUB is a Hold and DCOM is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AUB: $42.43 vs. DCOM: $40.76)
Brand notoriety: AUB and DCOM are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUB: 75% vs. DCOM: 119%
Market capitalization -- AUB: $6.02B vs. DCOM: $1.8B
AUB [@Regional Banks] is valued at $6.02B. DCOM’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.49B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUB’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileDCOM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUB’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • DCOM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AUB is a better buy in the long-term than DCOM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUB’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DCOM’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • DCOM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, DCOM is a better buy in the short-term than AUB.

Price Growth

AUB (@Regional Banks) experienced а +0.47% price change this week, while DCOM (@Regional Banks) price change was +3.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.19%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.65%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUB is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2026.

DCOM is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.19% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUB($6.02B) has a higher market cap than DCOM($1.8B). DCOM has higher P/E ratio than AUB: DCOM (14.77) vs AUB (12.37). DCOM YTD gains are higher at: 38.355 vs. AUB (22.515). AUB has more cash in the bank: 234M vs. DCOM (108M). DCOM has less debt than AUB: DCOM (656M) vs AUB (1.16B). AUB has higher revenues than DCOM: AUB (1.53B) vs DCOM (489M).
AUBDCOMAUB / DCOM
Capitalization6.02B1.8B335%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD22.51538.35559%
P/E Ratio12.3714.7784%
Revenue1.53B489M312%
Total Cash234M108M217%
Total Debt1.16B656M177%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUB vs DCOM: Fundamental Ratings
AUB
DCOM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7876
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
56
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6159
SMR RATING
1..100
2445
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4542
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7797
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUB's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOM (56) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to DCOM’s over the last 12 months.

DCOM's Profit vs Risk Rating (59) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (61) in the null industry. This means that DCOM’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's SMR Rating (24) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOM (45) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to DCOM’s over the last 12 months.

DCOM's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Savings Banks industry is in the same range as AUB (45) in the null industry. This means that DCOM’s stock grew similarly to AUB’s over the last 12 months.

AUB's P/E Growth Rating (77) in the null industry is in the same range as DCOM (97) in the Savings Banks industry. This means that AUB’s stock grew similarly to DCOM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBDCOM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUB
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DCOM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BANX20.400.13
+0.64%
ArrowMark Financial Corp
LIAE204.38N/A
N/A
LifeX 2050 Infl-Prt Longevity Income ETF
BFIX24.95-0.02
-0.08%
Build Bond Innovation ETF
OUSM48.65-0.07
-0.14%
ALPS O'Shares US Sm-Cp Qul Div ETF
VB295.14-0.66
-0.22%
Vanguard Morn Small Cap ETF

DCOM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, DCOM has been closely correlated with PGC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if DCOM jumps, then PGC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DCOM
1D Price
Change %
DCOM100%
-0.10%
PGC - DCOM
82%
Closely correlated
-0.09%
PFS - DCOM
81%
Closely correlated
-0.72%
AUB - DCOM
80%
Closely correlated
+0.35%
BUSE - DCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-1.34%
TCBK - DCOM
80%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
More