AUBN
Price
$27.00
Change
-$0.50 (-1.82%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
94.33M
FSEA
Price
$11.46
Change
+$0.21 (+1.87%)
Updated
Aug 8 closing price
Capitalization
54.06M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUBN vs FSEA

Header iconAUBN vs FSEA Comparison
Open Charts AUBN vs FSEABanner chart's image
Auburn National Ban
Price$27.00
Change-$0.50 (-1.82%)
Volume$698
Capitalization94.33M
First Seacoast Ban
Price$11.46
Change+$0.21 (+1.87%)
Volume$2.52K
Capitalization54.06M
AUBN vs FSEA Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUBN vs. FSEA commentary
Aug 10, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUBN is a Hold and FSEA is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 10, 2025
Stock price -- (AUBN: $27.00 vs. FSEA: $11.46)
Brand notoriety: AUBN and FSEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUBN: 26% vs. FSEA: 54%
Market capitalization -- AUBN: $96.08M vs. FSEA: $54.06M
AUBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $96.08M. FSEA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $54.06M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $172.58B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.73B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUBN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the long-term than AUBN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUBN’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FSEA’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUBN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • FSEA’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the short-term than AUBN.

Price Growth

AUBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а +6.26% price change this week, while FSEA (@Regional Banks) price change was -1.12% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +1.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.74%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+1.47% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUBN($94.3M) has a higher market cap than FSEA($54.1M). AUBN YTD gains are higher at: 17.910 vs. FSEA (14.143). AUBN has less debt than FSEA: AUBN (3.22M) vs FSEA (63.4M). AUBN has higher revenues than FSEA: AUBN (30.8M) vs FSEA (13.5M).
AUBNFSEAAUBN / FSEA
Capitalization94.3M54.1M174%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD17.91014.143127%
P/E Ratio14.21N/A-
Revenue30.8M13.5M228%
Total Cash22.2MN/A-
Total Debt3.22M63.4M5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUBN vs FSEA: Fundamental Ratings
AUBN
FSEA
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
74
Overvalued
88
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10041
SMR RATING
1..100
6590
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10027
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AUBN's Valuation (74) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (88) in the null industry. This means that AUBN’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's Profit vs Risk Rating (41) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AUBN (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew somewhat faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

AUBN's SMR Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (90) in the null industry. This means that AUBN’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

AUBN's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as FSEA (51) in the null industry. This means that AUBN’s stock grew similarly to FSEA’s over the last 12 months.

FSEA's P/E Growth Rating (27) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AUBN (100) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that FSEA’s stock grew significantly faster than AUBN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUBNFSEA
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
28%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
45%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
43%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
41%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
42%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
36%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUBN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
FSEA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PB66.060.66
+1.01%
Prosperity Bancshares
TTE61.330.53
+0.87%
TotalEnergies SE
PERF1.94N/A
N/A
Perfect Corp
ASPN7.55-0.02
-0.26%
Aspen Aerogels

AUBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUBN
1D Price
Change %
AUBN100%
-1.82%
SSBI - AUBN
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
CFBK - AUBN
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.05%
FSEA - AUBN
24%
Poorly correlated
+1.87%
PBBK - AUBN
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.27%
UBFO - AUBN
22%
Poorly correlated
+2.21%
More

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
+1.87%
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.26%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
+0.97%
HTB - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+0.42%
FRME - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.32%
More