AUBN
Price
$20.45
Change
-$0.05 (-0.24%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
66.38M
FSEA
Price
$10.82
Change
-$0.12 (-1.10%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
42.93M
Ad is loading...

AUBN vs FSEA

Header iconAUBN vs FSEA Comparison
Open Charts AUBN vs FSEABanner chart's image
Auburn National Ban
Price$20.45
Change-$0.05 (-0.24%)
Volume$1.2K
Capitalization66.38M
First Seacoast Ban
Price$10.82
Change-$0.12 (-1.10%)
Volume$16.39K
Capitalization42.93M
AUBN vs FSEA Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUBN vs. FSEA commentary
Feb 24, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUBN is a Hold and FSEA is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 24, 2025
Stock price -- (AUBN: $20.45 vs. FSEA: $10.82)
Brand notoriety: AUBN and FSEA are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUBN: 28% vs. FSEA: 151%
Market capitalization -- AUBN: $66.38M vs. FSEA: $42.93M
AUBN [@Regional Banks] is valued at $66.38M. FSEA’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $42.93M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUBN’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFSEA’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AUBN’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FSEA’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, FSEA is a better buy in the long-term than AUBN.

Price Growth

AUBN (@Regional Banks) experienced а -3.03% price change this week, while FSEA (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.66% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.76%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.90%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUBN is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.

FSEA is expected to report earnings on Mar 24, 2023.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-1.09% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUBN($66.4M) has a higher market cap than FSEA($42.9M). AUBN has higher P/E ratio than FSEA: AUBN (47.50) vs FSEA (35.97). FSEA YTD gains are higher at: 7.735 vs. AUBN (-12.942). AUBN has less debt than FSEA: AUBN (3.22M) vs FSEA (44.9M). AUBN has higher revenues than FSEA: AUBN (23.3M) vs FSEA (13.6M).
AUBNFSEAAUBN / FSEA
Capitalization66.4M42.9M155%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-12.9427.735-167%
P/E Ratio47.5035.97132%
Revenue23.3M13.6M171%
Total Cash16.4MN/A-
Total Debt3.22M44.9M7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AUBN: Fundamental Ratings
AUBN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
79
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
99
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PIGWX14.17-0.12
-0.84%
Putnam International Value R6
ASILX15.39-0.16
-1.03%
AB Select US Long/Short I
JHLVX53.50-0.91
-1.67%
JHancock Fundamental Large Cap Core C
ALSMX14.29-0.33
-2.26%
Archer Multi Cap
TMCAX12.07-0.33
-2.66%
RBC SMID Cap Growth A

AUBN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AUBN and SSBI have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AUBN and SSBI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUBN
1D Price
Change %
AUBN100%
-1.59%
SSBI - AUBN
29%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CFBK - AUBN
25%
Poorly correlated
-2.39%
FSEA - AUBN
24%
Poorly correlated
-1.13%
RBKB - AUBN
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.08%
IITSF - AUBN
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

FSEA and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FSEA has been loosely correlated with HBNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FSEA jumps, then HBNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FSEA
1D Price
Change %
FSEA100%
-1.13%
HBNC - FSEA
38%
Loosely correlated
-1.41%
BANR - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.48%
HTBI - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.75%
CPF - FSEA
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.87%
ABCB - FSEA
35%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
More