AUMI
Price
$94.94
Change
-$0.45 (-0.47%)
Updated
Aug 13, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Net Assets
24.61M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
RING
Price
$76.70
Change
-$2.39 (-3.02%)
Updated
Aug 13, 12:23 PM (EDT)
Net Assets
2.37B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUMI vs RING

AUMI vs RING Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 07, 2026

Which ETF would AI Choose? Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) vs. iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING)

Key Takeaways

  • Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) both offer targeted exposure to global gold mining companies but differ in index methodology, with AUMI tracking a pure-play index of the 30 largest miners and RING following a broader MSCI select gold miners index.
  • AUMI maintains a lower expense ratio of 0.35% compared to RING's 0.39%, potentially enhancing long-term cost efficiency for investors seeking similar thematic exposure.
  • RING typically features greater concentration in the largest global gold producers such as Newmont, while AUMI provides a more balanced weighting across mid-tier miners, resulting in distinct risk and diversification profiles within the sector.
  • Both ETFs are passive, non-diversified vehicles focused exclusively on the basic materials sector, with nearly 100% allocation to gold mining equities, making them sensitive to gold price trends and mining operational factors.
  • RING offers higher liquidity due to its substantially larger assets under management, whereas AUMI, launched in late 2023, emphasizes a market-cap-weighted approach with individual holding caps for broader representation among smaller constituents.
  • Investors comparing these ETFs should consider trade-offs between cost structure, holding concentration, and liquidity when positioning for gold sector exposure amid fluctuating commodity cycles and macroeconomic conditions.

Introduction

Gold mining equities represent a specialized segment within the broader precious metals and basic materials sectors, attracting investors seeking leveraged exposure to gold price movements without direct commodity ownership. The Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) provide comparable yet differentiated vehicles for accessing this theme. They do not compete directly as identical products but serve as alternative strategies targeting similar investor objectives of sector-specific equity exposure. Both ETFs enable participation in global gold mining operations, which can respond to factors such as metal prices, production costs, and regional mining dynamics, offering a focused complement to broader equity or commodity portfolios.

Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) Overview

The Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI) is a passive exchange-traded fund that seeks to track the performance of the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners Index. This index provides exposure to companies actively engaged in the gold mining industry through a market capitalization-weighted methodology applied to the 30 largest such firms worldwide. The ETF holds approximately 30 securities, with allocations emphasizing free-float market capitalization and individual position caps at 4.75%. Top holdings typically include companies such as DPM Metals Inc., Endeavour Mining PLC, AngloGold Ashanti plc, Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., and Northern Star Resources Ltd. Sector allocation is concentrated at 100% in basic materials, reflecting its thematic focus. AUMI carries an expense ratio of 0.35% and employs full replication where feasible, supplemented by American Depositary Receipts (ADRs) and Global Depositary Receipts (GDRs). Launched in December 2023, the fund is non-diversified and structured as an open-end investment company.

iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) Overview

The iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING) is a passive exchange-traded fund designed to track the MSCI ACWI Select Gold Miners Investable Market Index (IMI). This index includes global companies primarily engaged in gold mining activities. RING maintains approximately 40 to 42 holdings, with significant weighting toward larger producers. Top holdings commonly feature Newmont Corporation, Agnico Eagle Mines Ltd., Barrick Mining Corporation, Wheaton Precious Metals Corp., and AngloGold Ashanti plc. Sector exposure centers on gold mining within basic materials, often exceeding 98% in gold-related equities. The ETF reports an expense ratio of 0.39% and utilizes a representative sampling approach for efficient index tracking. As a long-established product from iShares, RING is non-diversified and benefits from established market presence.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

The gold mining sector operates within a commodity-driven environment influenced by gold price fluctuations, which respond to inflation expectations, interest rate policies, geopolitical tensions, and central bank purchasing activity. Macroeconomic drivers such as currency movements and global economic growth prospects can affect mining margins through input costs like energy and labor. Regulatory developments in key producing regions, including permitting processes and environmental standards, introduce operational considerations. Capital flows into precious metals equities often accelerate during periods of economic uncertainty or when real yields decline. Sector risks include production volatility, reserve depletion, and sensitivity to broader equity market sentiment, positioning gold miners as a thematic allocation that may complement diversified portfolios during specific market cycles.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent market cycles, both ETFs have exhibited performance patterns closely tied to gold price movements and the operational results of their underlying miners. AUMI's emphasis on a broader selection of mid-tier producers may result in different volatility characteristics compared to RING's heavier weighting in major global operators. Relative positioning reflects variations in index construction, with RING potentially demonstrating stronger correlation to the largest miners' earnings cycles and AUMI offering exposure to a wider array of companies. Over recent weeks and months, sector rotation driven by commodity trends and interest rate expectations has influenced both funds similarly, though differences in holding concentration can lead to varying responses during periods of gold price stability or shifts. Liquidity considerations favor RING in terms of trading volume, while cost differentials may support AUMI in longer holding periods.

AI Screener

Tickeron’s AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to discover additional investment opportunities aligned with your strategy.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a higher probabilistic preference to the Themes Gold Miners ETF (AUMI). This assessment draws from its modestly lower expense ratio, which supports cost efficiency over extended periods, combined with a more distributed weighting across gold mining constituents that may enhance diversification within the thematic universe. RING's established liquidity profile and concentration in leading producers represent strengths in other dimensions, yet the cost and representation advantages tilt the balance toward AUMI under prevailing conditions. Investors should evaluate these elements against individual objectives and risk tolerance.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AUMI vs. RING commentary
Aug 13, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUMI is a StrongBuy and RING is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RING has more net assets: 2.37B vs. AUMI (24.6M). RING has a higher annual dividend yield than AUMI: RING (8.220) vs AUMI (3.745). AUMI was incepted earlier than RING: AUMI (3 years) vs RING (15 years). AUMI (0.35) has a lower expense ratio than RING (0.39). AUMI has a higher turnover RING (23.00) vs RING (23.00).
AUMIRINGAUMI / RING
Gain YTD3.7458.22046%
Net Assets24.6M2.37B1%
Total Expense Ratio0.350.3990%
Turnover29.0023.00126%
Yield1.031.4273%
Fund Existence3 years15 years-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AUMIRING
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
88%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUMI
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
RING
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IEMG81.021.13
+1.41%
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
DEMZ48.440.12
+0.25%
Democratic Large Cap Core ETF
BCX12.660.01
+0.08%
Blackrock Resources & Commodities Strategy Trust
FTF5.81-0.03
-0.51%
Franklin Limited
RDYY16.25-0.17
-1.06%
YieldMax RDDT Option Income Strategy ETF

AUMI and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUMI has been closely correlated with AEM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 93% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AUMI jumps, then AEM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUMI
1D Price
Change %
AUMI100%
+0.99%
AEM - AUMI
93%
Closely correlated
+1.89%
TXG - AUMI
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
EQX - AUMI
2%
Poorly correlated
-1.11%
PRU - AUMI
2%
Poorly correlated
+0.34%
AGI - AUMI
0%
Poorly correlated
+0.24%
More

RING and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RING has been closely correlated with SSRM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if RING jumps, then SSRM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RING
1D Price
Change %
RING100%
+1.23%
SSRM - RING
85%
Closely correlated
+1.72%
TXG - RING
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.25%
CG - RING
23%
Poorly correlated
-0.19%
AR - RING
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.93%
RSG - RING
6%
Poorly correlated
-0.38%
More