AUR
Price
$8.25
Change
-$0.15 (-1.79%)
Updated
May 14, 11:00 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.47B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
PONY
Price
$9.02
Change
+$0.16 (+1.81%)
Updated
May 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.9B
12 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUR vs PONY

Header iconAUR vs PONY Comparison
Open Charts AUR vs PONYBanner chart's image
AUR vs PONY Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Aurora Innovation (AUR) vs. Pony AI (PONY) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Aurora Innovation (AUR) has delivered stronger year-to-date gains of approximately 36%, outperforming Pony AI (PONY)'s 21% rise amid autonomous vehicle (AV) sector momentum.
  • PONY generates significantly higher trailing twelve-month (TTM) revenue at $90 million compared to AUR's $3 million, reflecting earlier commercialization in robotaxi services.
  • AUR focuses on driverless trucking in the U.S., expanding operations across the Sun Belt, while PONY advances global robotaxi deployments in over 20 cities.
  • PONY reported its first quarterly profit in Q4 2025 with robotaxi revenues surging 160% year-over-year, contrasting AUR's ongoing pre-commercial ramp-up.
  • Analyst price targets indicate potential upside: AUR at $10.59 from current levels around $5.22, and PONY at $16.60 from $11.55.

Introduction

Aurora Innovation (AUR) and Pony AI (PONY) represent key players in the burgeoning autonomous vehicle sector, with AUR emphasizing driverless trucking solutions in North America and PONY prioritizing robotaxi services globally. This comparison is particularly relevant for growth-oriented traders and investors tracking AV advancements, as both companies navigate regulatory progress, technological milestones, and market adoption. Recent expansions and financial updates highlight their relative positioning in a market projected to deliver substantial efficiency gains, aiding decisions on sector exposure and stock selection based on momentum, revenue trajectories, and risk profiles.

AUR Overview and Recent Performance

Aurora Innovation (AUR), headquartered in Pittsburgh, develops the Aurora Driver platform—a suite of self-driving hardware, software, and data services tailored for commercial trucks. In recent market activity, AUR shares have climbed amid pre-earnings optimism for Q1 2026 and expansions in driverless operations across the U.S. Sun Belt, including over 250,000 incident-free miles logged. The stock's year-to-date advance of nearly 36% reflects positive sentiment around reports projecting $9 billion in annual consumer savings from autonomous trucking by 2035, alongside plans for over 200 driverless trucks in 2026. Trading near $5.22 with a $10.2 billion market cap, AUR's performance has been buoyed by analyst upgrades and a focus on scalable freight hauling, though it remains pre-revenue at scale with TTM losses.

PONY Overview and Recent Performance

Pony AI (PONY), based in Guangzhou, China, with international operations, delivers robotaxi and robotruck services via its Virtual Driver technology, alongside licensing for personally-owned AV solutions. Recent weeks have seen PONY advance robotaxi launches, including in Zagreb, Croatia, and a partnership with Uber for Europe's first commercial service, driving stock reactions. The company posted its inaugural quarterly profit in Q4 2025, with robotaxi revenues up 160% year-over-year and plans for 3,000 vehicles across 20+ cities by year-end, fueled by the PonyWorld 2.0 AI upgrade. At around $11.55 and a $5 billion market cap, PONY's 21% YTD gain underscores momentum from revenue scaling to $90 million TTM, tempered by volatility in AV regulatory landscapes.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots from its library of 351 bots, which collectively trade thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots adapt to current market conditions through AI/ML-driven signals, featuring diverse strategies like swing trading, trend following, dip buying, and multi-agent pairs trading with risk controls such as take-profit/stop-loss (TP/SL) corridors. Performance highlights include annualized returns ranging from 15.5% to 167.8%, win rates of 54% to 88%, and profit factors up to 11.7, with timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 days targeting sectors like semiconductors, finance, and aerospace. Traders can explore these for real-time insights tailored to volatile environments.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AUR and PONY both target AV dominance but diverge in focus: AUR's trucking-centric model leverages U.S. freight corridors for efficiency gains, while PONY's robotaxi emphasis spans China and emerging global markets with higher near-term revenue potential. Growth drivers contrast with PONY's scaling robotaxi fares (500%+ surge) versus AUR's operational ramp-up toward commercial launches. Recent momentum favors AUR's steadier YTD climb, though PONY's catalysts like European entries add volatility. Risk factors include regulatory hurdles and tech validation for both, with PONY exposed to geopolitical tensions and AUR to trucking adoption pace. Sector exposure tilts AUR toward logistics stability and PONY toward urban mobility upside, shaping divergent market sentiment profiles.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently favors Pony AI (PONY) over Aurora Innovation (AUR), based on superior revenue momentum, the recent profitability milestone, and expansive robotaxi catalysts positioning it for faster commercialization amid global AV trends. AUR offers trend consistency in U.S. trucking but trails in financial traction.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AUR vs. PONY commentary
May 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUR is a Hold and PONY is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AUR: $8.40 vs. PONY: $9.03)
Brand notoriety: AUR and PONY are both not notable
AUR represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while PONY is part of the Information Technology Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUR: 253% vs. PONY: 97%
Market capitalization -- AUR: $16.47B vs. PONY: $3.9B
AUR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $16.47B. PONY’s [@Information Technology Services] market capitalization is $3.9B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $74.34B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Information Technology Services] industry ranges from $201.74B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $7.06B. The average market capitalization across the [@Information Technology Services] industry is $7.77B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePONY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PONY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AUR and PONY are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUR’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PONY’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUR’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • PONY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUR is a better buy in the short-term than PONY.

Price Growth

AUR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +15.54% price change this week, while PONY (@Information Technology Services) price change was -12.03% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was +1.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.72%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Information Technology Services industry was -1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.67%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUR is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2026.

PONY is expected to report earnings on May 26, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (+1.17% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Information Technology Services (-1.09% weekly)

The industry, whose total market cap runs into trillions, makes hardware/software that allows data to be stored, retrieved, transmitted, and manipulated on computers. With the ever-increasing relevance of data, the information technology (IT) industry has gained momentous growth over the years, and continues to thrive on innovation. Some of the behemoths in the industry are International Business Machines Corporation, Accenture, and VMware, Inc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUR($16.5B) has a higher market cap than PONY($3.9B). AUR YTD gains are higher at: 118.750 vs. PONY (-37.690). PONY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -360.08M vs. AUR (-904M). AUR has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. PONY (445M). PONY has less debt than AUR: PONY (15.1M) vs AUR (79M). PONY has higher revenues than AUR: PONY (96.4M) vs AUR (4M).
AURPONYAUR / PONY
Capitalization16.5B3.9B424%
EBITDA-904M-360.08M251%
Gain YTD118.750-37.690-315%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue4M96.4M4%
Total Cash1.23B445M275%
Total Debt79M15.1M523%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AURPONY
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
87%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
84%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
PONY
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PEIYX41.780.02
+0.05%
Putnam Large Cap Value Y
GRGTX50.18N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Equity Income Inv
PLARX12.26N/A
N/A
Principal SmallCap Value II R5
IAUYX27.63N/A
N/A
Invesco Dividend Income Y
ECFGX20.04N/A
N/A
Eaton Vance Focused Growth Opps C

PONY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PONY has been loosely correlated with BBAI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if PONY jumps, then BBAI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PONY
1D Price
Change %
PONY100%
+1.98%
BBAI - PONY
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.48%
AUR - PONY
41%
Loosely correlated
+16.34%
CIFR - PONY
40%
Loosely correlated
+5.88%
GDS - PONY
34%
Loosely correlated
+6.89%
INGM - PONY
33%
Loosely correlated
-1.82%
More