AUR
Price
$6.45
Change
+$0.21 (+3.37%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
12.65B
93 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLYW
Price
$16.01
Change
-$0.26 (-1.60%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
1.98B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUR vs FLYW

AUR vs FLYW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUR vs. FLYW commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUR is a Buy and FLYW is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (AUR: $6.45 vs. FLYW: $16.01)
Brand notoriety: AUR and FLYW are both not notable
AUR represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while FLYW is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUR: 78% vs. FLYW: 71%
Market capitalization -- AUR: $12.65B vs. FLYW: $1.98B
AUR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $12.65B. FLYW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $1.98B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.92B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $3.45T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.24B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $32.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLYW is a better buy in the long-term than AUR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUR’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLYW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUR’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FLYW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AUR is a better buy in the short-term than FLYW.

Price Growth

AUR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а +8.40% price change this week, while FLYW (@Computer Communications) price change was +0.76% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -1.79%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -9.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +0.28%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was +0.92%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -8.66%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.23%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUR is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

FLYW is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-1.79% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Computer Communications (+0.92% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUR($12.6B) has a higher market cap than FLYW($1.98B). AUR YTD gains are higher at: 67.969 vs. FLYW (13.065). FLYW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 72.8M vs. AUR (-904M). AUR has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. FLYW (325M). FLYW has less debt than AUR: FLYW (1.45M) vs AUR (79M). FLYW has higher revenues than AUR: FLYW (678M) vs AUR (4M).
AURFLYWAUR / FLYW
Capitalization12.6B1.98B638%
EBITDA-904M72.8M-1,242%
Gain YTD67.96913.065520%
P/E RatioN/A66.71-
Revenue4M678M1%
Total Cash1.23B325M377%
Total Debt79M1.45M5,437%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AURFLYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
79%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
83%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
80%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
79%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
80%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NEOG12.040.51
+4.42%
Neogen Corp
BPAC10.16N/A
N/A
Blueport Acquisition Ltd
FMS25.66-0.04
-0.16%
Fresenius Medical Care AG
SLI2.04-0.01
-0.49%
Standard Lithium Ltd
LRHC0.98-0.09
-8.41%
La Rosa Holdings Corp.

AUR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AUR has been loosely correlated with AI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 58% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AUR jumps, then AI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AUR
1D Price
Change %
AUR100%
+3.37%
AI - AUR
58%
Loosely correlated
+1.21%
FLYW - AUR
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
QS - AUR
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.19%
PSFE - AUR
48%
Loosely correlated
-4.60%
HSAI - AUR
47%
Loosely correlated
+2.11%
More