AUR
Price
$6.05
Change
-$0.33 (-5.17%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
11.9B
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FLYW
Price
$17.78
Change
+$0.16 (+0.91%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.19B
28 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AUR vs FLYW

AUR vs FLYW Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AUR vs. FLYW commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AUR is a Buy and FLYW is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (AUR: $6.05 vs. FLYW: $17.78)
Brand notoriety: AUR and FLYW are both not notable
AUR represents the Auto Parts: OEM, while FLYW is part of the Computer Communications industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AUR: 36% vs. FLYW: 46%
Market capitalization -- AUR: $11.9B vs. FLYW: $2.19B
AUR [@Auto Parts: OEM] is valued at $11.9B. FLYW’s [@Computer Communications] market capitalization is $2.19B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry ranges from $72.33B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Computer Communications] industry ranges from $2.9T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Auto Parts: OEM] industry is $5.31B. The average market capitalization across the [@Computer Communications] industry is $29.47B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AUR’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLYW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AUR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FLYW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FLYW is a better buy in the long-term than AUR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AUR’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLYW’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AUR’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
  • FLYW’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, FLYW is a better buy in the short-term than AUR.

Price Growth

AUR (@Auto Parts: OEM) experienced а -10.90% price change this week, while FLYW (@Computer Communications) price change was -3.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Auto Parts: OEM industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.50%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.02%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Computer Communications industry was -4.12%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.06%.

Reported Earning Dates

AUR is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

FLYW is expected to report earnings on Aug 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Auto Parts: OEM (-4.12% weekly)

OEM or Original Equipment Manufacturer of auto parts refers to the original producer of a vehicles components, and so OEM car parts are usually identical to the parts used in producing the vehicle in the first place. OEM parts tend to fit the specifications of a particular model, and their compatibility is often guaranteed by the automaker itself. OEM parts could be more expensive to buy (compared to other vendors’ products) when a consumer goes for replacement. However, increased competition from aftermarket parts/third-party vendors could, in some cases, keep EOM prices in check. The industry might progress further in adopting newer technologies like 3D printing to boost supply chain performance and quality. Aptiv PLC, Magna International Inc. and BorgWarner Inc. are major OEMs for autos.

@Computer Communications (-4.12% weekly)

Computer communications industry develops technology that allows computing devices to exchange data with each other using connections/data links between nodes. Common types of computer network include Cloud (IAN), Internet, Wide (WAN, Local (LAN)/Wireless(WLAN) etc. The industry is an ever-more important part of technology, and is set to become even bigger as the Internet of Things (IoT) rapidly forays into the various aspects of our lives. Cisco Systems, Inc., Palo Alto Networks, Inc. and Arista Networks, Inc., Fortinet, Inc. are some of the major computer communications companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AUR($11.9B) has a higher market cap than FLYW($2.19B). AUR YTD gains are higher at: 57.552 vs. FLYW (25.565). FLYW has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 72.8M vs. AUR (-904M). AUR has more cash in the bank: 1.23B vs. FLYW (325M). FLYW has less debt than AUR: FLYW (1.45M) vs AUR (79M). FLYW has higher revenues than AUR: FLYW (678M) vs AUR (4M).
AURFLYWAUR / FLYW
Capitalization11.9B2.19B542%
EBITDA-904M72.8M-1,242%
Gain YTD57.55225.565225%
P/E RatioN/A74.08-
Revenue4M678M1%
Total Cash1.23B325M377%
Total Debt79M1.45M5,437%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AURFLYW
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 20 days ago
82%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AUR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FLYW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CCOM23.80N/A
N/A
Simplify Chinese Cmdts Stgy No K-1 ETF
QTOP38.14N/A
N/A
iShares Nasdaq Top 30 Stocks ETF
GSC66.38-0.63
-0.94%
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Equity ETF
SPGM85.07-0.94
-1.09%
State Street® SPDR® Ptf MSCIGlbStkMktETF
FFLS22.95-0.34
-1.46%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF

FLYW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLYW has been loosely correlated with GLOB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLYW jumps, then GLOB could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FLYW
1D Price
Change %
FLYW100%
+0.91%
GLOB - FLYW
66%
Loosely correlated
+7.21%
ACN - FLYW
64%
Loosely correlated
+2.43%
CLVT - FLYW
61%
Loosely correlated
+2.69%
EPAM - FLYW
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.97%
CLSK - FLYW
59%
Loosely correlated
-3.81%
More