It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AVAL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileFHN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AVAL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FHN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AVAL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.64% price change this week, while FHN (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.36% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.
AVAL is expected to report earnings on Mar 13, 2025.
FHN is expected to report earnings on Jan 17, 2025.
Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.
AVAL | FHN | AVAL / FHN | |
Capitalization | 2.62B | 8.55B | 31% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | -5.882 | 46.287 | -13% |
P/E Ratio | 12.61 | 9.71 | 130% |
Revenue | 15.85T | 3.16B | 502,441% |
Total Cash | N/A | 1.01B | - |
Total Debt | N/A | 1.48B | - |
AVAL | FHN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 20 | 79 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 5 Undervalued | 65 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 8 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 70 | 15 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 75 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AVAL's Valuation (5) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FHN (65) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew somewhat faster than FHN’s over the last 12 months.
FHN's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AVAL (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.
AVAL's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FHN (8) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that AVAL’s stock grew similarly to FHN’s over the last 12 months.
FHN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as AVAL (52) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew similarly to AVAL’s over the last 12 months.
FHN's P/E Growth Rating (15) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AVAL (70) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FHN’s stock grew somewhat faster than AVAL’s over the last 12 months.
AVAL | FHN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago55% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago72% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago71% | 2 days ago58% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago63% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago67% | 2 days ago59% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago45% | 2 days ago61% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 16 days ago56% | 8 days ago63% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 27 days ago66% | 6 days ago59% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago57% | 2 days ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago41% | 2 days ago58% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UMAR | 35.88 | -0.04 | -0.10% |
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra BffrETF™-Mar | |||
SHE | 118.49 | -0.37 | -0.31% |
SPDR® MSCI USA Gender Diversity ETF | |||
GSG | 21.33 | -0.08 | -0.37% |
iShares S&P GSCI Commodity-Indexed Trust | |||
GYLD | 12.87 | -0.13 | -1.03% |
Arrow Dow Jones Global Yield ETF | |||
SOXX | 223.87 | -3.21 | -1.41% |
iShares Semiconductor ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AVAL has been loosely correlated with CIB. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AVAL jumps, then CIB could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AVAL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AVAL | 100% | +1.20% | ||
CIB - AVAL | 34% Loosely correlated | -0.94% | ||
BCH - AVAL | 28% Poorly correlated | -1.74% | ||
FHN - AVAL | 25% Poorly correlated | -1.72% | ||
FBP - AVAL | 25% Poorly correlated | -3.04% | ||
FFBC - AVAL | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.32% | ||
More |