AVLV vs VTV

Key Takeaways

• Strategy differs: AVLV is an actively managed, rules-based U.S. large-cap value fund, while VTV is a passive index fund tracking the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index.
• Cost gap: VTV charges a 0.03% expense ratio versus 0.15% for AVLV, a meaningful long-term cost advantage for the Vanguard product.
• Diversification: VTV holds roughly 325 stocks versus about 270 for AVLV, giving VTV a broader, less concentrated footprint.
• Sector tilts differ: Both lean on financials, but AVLV carries materially more energy and consumer cyclical exposure, while VTV is more defensive with larger health care and consumer staples weightings.
• Style nuance: AVLV emphasizes profitability alongside value and includes select mega-cap technology names, whereas VTV skews toward classic dividend-paying value franchises.
• Performance drivers: AVLV is more sensitive to cyclical rotation and value momentum; VTV is more anchored to defensive sectors and steady cash-flow businesses.

Introduction

Investors evaluating large-cap value exposure often encounter AVLV and VTV as two prominent options in the same category. Both target U.S. large-capitalization value equities, yet they pursue that objective through fundamentally different structures and philosophies. AVLV is an actively managed, systematically tilted portfolio from Avantis Investors, while VTV is a low-cost, passive index vehicle from Vanguard. This ETF comparison matters today because value stocks have been a focal point of market rotation as investors weigh elevated growth-stock valuations against cheaper, cash-generating businesses. Understanding the structural differences, sector exposure, and relative positioning of these funds is essential for building a diversified portfolio.

Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF (AVLV) Overview

AVLV is an actively managed ETF that invests primarily in large-capitalization U.S. companies, applying a systematic, rules-based approach focused on value and profitability factors. Rather than blindly tracking an index, portfolio managers screen for companies with attractive valuations, strong profitability, and favorable fundamental characteristics. The fund typically holds around 270 stocks, with a top-heavy tilt toward financial services, which represents roughly 22% of assets. Energy (about 14–15%), consumer cyclical (about 15%), and industrials (about 13%) are also prominent, while technology accounts for roughly 13%. Top holdings have included MU (Micron Technology), AAPL (Apple), AMZN (Amazon), META (Meta Platforms), XOM (Exxon Mobil), COST (Costco), CAT (Caterpillar), LRCX (Lam Research), and JPM (JPMorgan Chase). The expense ratio is 0.15%, and the fund was launched in September 2021.

Vanguard Value ETF (VTV) Overview

VTV is a passively managed ETF that seeks to track the CRSP U.S. Large Cap Value Index, using full replication to mirror the benchmark before fees and expenses. Launched in January 2004, it is the largest large-cap value ETF in the U.S. market, with a broad portfolio of approximately 325 holdings. Financials are the largest sector at about 23% of assets, followed by health care (roughly 16%), technology (about 14%), industrials (about 13%), and consumer staples (around 8.5%). Utilities, energy, and consumer cyclical each contribute smaller single-digit weightings. Top holdings have included BRK.B (Berkshire Hathaway), JPM (JPMorgan Chase), XOM (Exxon Mobil), JNJ (Johnson & Johnson), WMT (Walmart), CVX (Chevron), ABBV (AbbVie), and MU (Micron Technology). Its expense ratio is a very low 0.03%.

Industry and Thematic Backdrop

Both funds operate within the large-cap value segment, which has drawn renewed attention as investors reassess the elevated valuations attached to high-growth technology and artificial intelligence-linked names. In recent market cycles, capital flows have periodically rotated toward financials, energy producers, and industrial companies that generate earnings and dividends today rather than relying on distant future growth. Rising and then moderating interest-rate expectations have also influenced this rotation, because value stocks tend to be more sensitive to the macroeconomic and credit cycle. Regulatory developments affecting banks and energy firms, alongside commodity price swings, remain key catalysts. The principal risk for value strategies is that a sharp resurgence in mega-cap growth leadership would leave these funds lagging, while their heavy financial and energy weightings tie performance to the broader economy and commodity markets.

Performance and Positioning Comparison

In recent weeks and months, both AVLV and VTV have benefited from the same broad value tailwind, but their relative positioning differs. AVLV's larger energy and consumer cyclical exposure makes it more responsive to commodity trends and cyclical earnings recoveries, while its inclusion of select mega-cap technology names adds a growth-adjacent element that can either help or hurt depending on the rotation's direction. VTV, by contrast, is more defensive: its meaningful health care, consumer staples, and utilities allocations provide steadier cash flows and a lower beta profile. Consequently, VTV has tended to exhibit lower volatility, whereas AVLV may capture more upside during cyclical rallies. Fund performance ultimately hinges on whether sector rotation favors cyclicals or defensives, and on how earnings from top financial and energy holdings unfold across the cycle.

AI Screener

Tickeron's AI Screener is an AI-powered stock and ETF discovery tool that helps traders and investors filter the market based on technical patterns, fundamentals, trends, volatility, and AI-driven signals. Users can scan thousands of stocks and ETFs using customizable filters such as industry, market capitalization, technical indicators, price patterns, and performance metrics. The screener helps identify trade ideas, trending stocks, breakout candidates, and market opportunities more efficiently than manual screening. Explore the AI Screener to streamline your research and uncover actionable ideas.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable structural factors, Tickeron's AI would likely favor VTV for most long-term, cost-conscious investors. Its materially lower expense ratio, broader diversification, and lower-volatility sector mix offer a durable, efficient core holding. However, if the analytical emphasis shifts to momentum and cyclical exposure, AVLV may screen more favorably, given its profitability tilt and greater sensitivity to energy and consumer cyclical strength. The verdict is therefore probabilistic rather than absolute: VTV appears better suited to stability- and cost-focused positioning, while AVLV may appeal to investors seeking a more aggressively tilted, factor-driven value strategy.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations