BAC vs SMFG
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Hold and SMFG is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
- SMFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а -5.60% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was -7.29% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -1.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
BAC is expected to report earnings on Jan 16, 2025.
SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 30, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Major Banks (-1.46% weekly)Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.
| BAC | SMFG | BAC / SMFG | |
| Capitalization | 299B | 74.8B | 400% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 32.483 | 46.493 | 70% |
| P/E Ratio | 12.18 | 13.83 | 88% |
| Revenue | 98.6B | 3.98T | 2% |
| Total Cash | 25.3B | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | 334B | 32.98T | 1% |
BAC | SMFG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 62 | 56 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 75 Overvalued | 47 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 45 | 8 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 1 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 43 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 19 | 55 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 85 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
SMFG's Valuation (47) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (75). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (8) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAC (45). This means that SMFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAC’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.
SMFG's Price Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (45). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.
BAC's P/E Growth Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SMFG (55). This means that BAC’s stock grew somewhat faster than SMFG’s over the last 12 months.
| BAC | SMFG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 67% | 1 day ago 63% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 74% | 1 day ago 56% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% | 1 day ago 52% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 46% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 51% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 62% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 14 days ago 66% | 17 days ago 59% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 63% | 1 day ago 52% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 66% | 1 day ago 66% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 65% |
SMFG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 88% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SMFG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMFG | 100% | -2.71% | ||
| MUFG - SMFG | 88% Closely correlated | -2.29% | ||
| C - SMFG | 41% Loosely correlated | -4.22% | ||
| BAC - SMFG | 39% Loosely correlated | -3.44% | ||
| SMFNF - SMFG | 38% Loosely correlated | -5.30% | ||
| HSBC - SMFG | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.46% | ||
More | ||||