BAC
Price
$39.58
Change
+$0.83 (+2.14%)
Updated
Apr 24 closing price
Capitalization
299.21B
82 days until earnings call
SMFG
Price
$13.80
Change
+$0.16 (+1.17%)
Updated
Apr 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
74.81B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAC vs SMFG

Header iconBAC vs SMFG Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs SMFGBanner chart's image
Bank of America
Price$39.58
Change+$0.83 (+2.14%)
Volume$42.46M
Capitalization299.21B
Sumitomo Mitsui Financial Group
Price$13.80
Change+$0.16 (+1.17%)
Volume$12.26K
Capitalization74.81B
BAC vs SMFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAC vs. SMFG commentary
Apr 25, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a StrongBuy and SMFG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 25, 2025
Stock price -- (BAC: $39.58 vs. SMFG: $13.79)
Brand notoriety: BAC: Notable vs. SMFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 80% vs. SMFG: 71%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $299.21B vs. SMFG: $74.81B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $299.21B. SMFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $74.81B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSMFG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SMFG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the long-term than BAC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SMFG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SMFG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SMFG is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +5.80% price change this week, while SMFG (@Major Banks) price change was +1.70% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +2.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +70.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.92%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 16, 2025.

SMFG is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+2.75% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($299B) has a higher market cap than SMFG($74.8B). SMFG has higher P/E ratio than BAC: SMFG (13.83) vs BAC (12.18). SMFG YTD gains are higher at: -4.831 vs. BAC (-9.375). BAC has less debt than SMFG: BAC (334B) vs SMFG (32.98T). SMFG has higher revenues than BAC: SMFG (3.98T) vs BAC (98.6B).
BACSMFGBAC / SMFG
Capitalization299B74.8B400%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-9.375-4.831194%
P/E Ratio12.1813.8388%
Revenue98.6B3.98T2%
Total Cash25.3BN/A-
Total Debt334B32.98T1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs SMFG: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
SMFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2317
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3914
SMR RATING
1..100
11
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6158
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6081
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SMFG's Valuation (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (71). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (14) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (39). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (1). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

SMFG's Price Growth Rating (58) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (61). This means that SMFG’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as SMFG (81). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to SMFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACSMFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 18 days ago
47%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SMFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AXTI1.380.06
+4.55%
AXT
CNS76.852.60
+3.50%
Cohen & Steers
LYV132.721.44
+1.10%
Live Nation Entertainment
NRC10.690.06
+0.61%
National Research Corp
SOGP2.200.01
+0.46%
Sound Group

BAC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAC has been closely correlated with C. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAC jumps, then C could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAC
1D Price
Change %
BAC100%
+2.14%
C - BAC
85%
Closely correlated
+2.81%
WFC - BAC
84%
Closely correlated
+2.38%
JPM - BAC
80%
Closely correlated
+1.56%
BMO - BAC
70%
Closely correlated
+1.39%
EWBC - BAC
68%
Closely correlated
+1.81%
More

SMFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SMFG has been closely correlated with MUFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SMFG jumps, then MUFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SMFG
1D Price
Change %
SMFG100%
+1.03%
MUFG - SMFG
91%
Closely correlated
+1.41%
C - SMFG
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.81%
HSBC - SMFG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.55%
BCS - SMFG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
BAC - SMFG
56%
Loosely correlated
+2.14%
More