BAC
Price
$53.46
Change
-$0.49 (-0.91%)
Updated
Apr 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
384.66B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$81.53
Change
-$0.44 (-0.54%)
Updated
Apr 21, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
251.18B
84 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAC vs WFC

Header iconBAC vs WFC Comparison
Open Charts BAC vs WFCBanner chart's image
BAC vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bank of America (BAC) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAC trades around $52.70 with a year-to-date (YTD) decline of approximately 4%, outperforming WFC's steeper YTD drop of about 7% near $86.00.
  • Both stocks exhibit similar forward P/E ratios around 13-14, with comparable dividend yields near 2.1%, appealing to income-focused investors.
  • BAC boasts a larger market cap of roughly $376 billion versus WFC's $263 billion, reflecting broader scale in investment banking and global operations.
  • Recent market activity shows both gaining over 6% in the past week amid sector rotation, though WFC displays higher volatility.
  • Analyst targets suggest 15-20% upside for both, driven by expected net interest income (NII, the difference between interest earned on loans and paid on deposits) growth into 2026.
  • Tickeron's AI tools highlight sector momentum favoring diversified banks like these in volatile conditions.

Introduction

Bank of America (BAC) and Wells Fargo (WFC) represent two of the largest U.S. banks by assets, offering investors exposure to consumer banking, commercial lending, and wealth management amid shifting interest rates and economic uncertainties. This stock comparison analyzes their recent performance, business models, and market positioning to aid traders seeking relative value in the financial sector and long-term investors evaluating stability versus growth potential. With both navigating regulatory progress and macroeconomic headwinds, understanding their contrasts in scale, revenue diversity, and momentum provides actionable insights for portfolio decisions in the current environment.

BAC Overview and Recent Performance

Bank of America (BAC), a global financial giant with over $3.4 trillion in assets, operates through consumer banking, global wealth & investment management, and global banking segments. Recent market activity has seen BAC shares rise about 8% over the past month to around $52.70, outpacing the broader finance sector's decline. This resilience stems from strong Q4 2025 results, including $7.6 billion in net income (up 12% year-over-year) and EPS of $0.98 (up 18%), fueled by 10% NII growth to $15.9 billion (fully taxable equivalent, or FTE basis). The bank's common equity tier 1 (CET1, a key measure of core capital strength) ratio stands at 11.4%, supporting $30 billion in 2025 capital returns. Sentiment has improved on expectations of 5-7% NII growth in 2026, loan expansion, and digital innovations like AI-powered tools, though YTD performance lags at -4% amid rate sensitivity.

WFC Overview and Recent Performance

Wells Fargo (WFC), with $1.9 trillion in assets, focuses on community banking, corporate & investment banking, and wealth management, benefiting from the 2025 Federal Reserve asset cap removal. Shares have climbed roughly 14% in the past month to near $86.00, reflecting Q4 2025 net income of $5.4 billion and EPS of $1.62 (13% higher excluding severance), with revenue up 4% to $21.3 billion on 4% NII growth to $12.3 billion. Average loans grew 5% to $956 billion, deposits 2% to $1.4 trillion, and CET1 ratio at 10.6% enables aggressive buybacks. Credit quality remains stable with net charge-offs at 0.43% of average loans. YTD decline of -7% trails peers due to higher mortgage exposure, but Q1 2026 EPS estimates signal 24% growth, boosting optimism around $50 billion NII target.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top 25 performers from over 351 AI trading bots designed for copy trading across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots, curated for current market conditions, deliver real-time signals using technical and fundamental analysis, with strategies like swing trading, trend following, and hedging. Standout stats include annualized returns up to 151%, win rates from 53% to 87%, profit factors to 11.45, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 21. Sector-focused bots target semiconductors, energy, and aerospace, often outperforming the S&P 500 in volatile periods. Diverse timeframes (1 day to 57 days) and risk management suit various styles. Explore these high-performing bots to enhance your trading edge in today’s dynamic markets.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAC and WFC share consumer lending cores but diverge in diversification: BAC's global investment banking and wealth management provide fee stability (8% investment banking fee growth in 2025), while WFC emphasizes domestic commercial real estate and mortgages, heightening rate risk but enabling post-cap loan surges. Recent momentum favors WFC (36% one-year return vs. BAC's 47%, adjusted for volatility), yet BAC leads in scale and ROTCE (return on tangible common equity, a profitability gauge; 14% vs. 14.5%). Risks include credit losses (both under 50 basis points) and NII compression, with BAC less exposed via deposit growth. Market sentiment tilts toward BAC for stability, WFC for growth trade-offs.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward BAC based on superior trend consistency, diversified revenue mitigating rate risks, stronger CET1 buffer, and relative YTD outperformance. While WFC offers compelling loan growth and capital returns post-regulatory relief, BAC's global positioning and NII outlook provide higher probability of stability amid volatility. Observable catalysts like Q1 earnings could shift dynamics, favoring BAC with 60-70% confidence in near-term relative strength.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAC vs. WFC commentary
Apr 21, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAC is a Buy and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 21, 2026
Stock price -- (BAC: $53.95 vs. WFC: $81.97)
Brand notoriety: BAC and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAC: 111% vs. WFC: 104%
Market capitalization -- BAC: $384.66B vs. WFC: $251.18B
BAC [@Major Banks] is valued at $384.66B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $251.18B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $849.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $151.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAC is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAC’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than BAC.

Price Growth

BAC (@Major Banks) experienced а +1.12% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was -5.39% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +0.30%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.81%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+0.30% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAC($385B) has a higher market cap than WFC($251B). BAC has higher P/E ratio than WFC: BAC (13.42) vs WFC (12.67). BAC YTD gains are higher at: -1.355 vs. WFC (-11.617). WFC has more cash in the bank: 34.8B vs. BAC (25.4B). WFC has less debt than BAC: WFC (193B) vs BAC (366B). BAC has higher revenues than WFC: BAC (113B) vs WFC (83.7B).
BACWFCBAC / WFC
Capitalization385B251B153%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-1.355-11.61712%
P/E Ratio13.4212.67106%
Revenue113B83.7B135%
Total Cash25.4B34.8B73%
Total Debt366B193B190%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAC vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
BAC
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3521
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
68
Overvalued
74
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4821
SMR RATING
1..100
12
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
4353
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAC's Valuation (68) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (74). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

WFC's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BAC (48). This means that WFC’s stock grew similarly to BAC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (2). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's Price Growth Rating (21) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (52). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

BAC's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as WFC (53). This means that BAC’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BACWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCM104.030.58
+0.56%
Invesco S&P SmallCap Materials ETF
CMSA21.930.01
+0.04%
CMS Energy Corp
DJIA21.44-0.02
-0.09%
Global X Dow 30 Covered Call ETF
IGE60.52-0.06
-0.10%
iShares North American Natural Res ETF
SCHX27.96-0.03
-0.11%
Schwab US Large-Cap ETF™