C
Price
$140.71
Change
-$0.08 (-0.06%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
239.99B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WFC
Price
$87.69
Change
+$0.53 (+0.61%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
268.29B
One day until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

C vs WFC

C vs WFC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Citigroup (C) vs. Wells Fargo (WFC) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Citigroup (C) has delivered stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared with Wells Fargo (WFC), reflecting broader momentum in its global operations.
  • Both banks passed the Federal Reserve’s 2026 stress tests, enabling dividend increases and share repurchase programs that support capital returns to shareholders.
  • Citigroup (C) benefits from diversified revenue across international markets and investment banking, while Wells Fargo (WFC) maintains a primarily U.S. consumer and commercial banking focus.
  • Analyst sentiment has turned positive for both stocks ahead of second-quarter earnings, with several price-target upgrades reported in recent weeks.
  • Valuation metrics show Wells Fargo (WFC) trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio, offering a potential value contrast to Citigroup (C)’s growth profile.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between Citigroup (C)’s higher volatility and growth leverage versus Wells Fargo (WFC)’s greater stability in domestic lending.

Introduction

This comparison examines Citigroup (C) and Wells Fargo (WFC), two major U.S. banks with distinct business models and geographic footprints. Institutional and retail investors seeking exposure to the financial sector often evaluate these names when assessing relative performance, capital-return potential, and sensitivity to interest-rate and regulatory developments. The analysis draws on recent market activity, earnings expectations, and sector positioning to help traders and portfolio managers understand key contrasts in the current environment.

Citigroup (C) Overview and Recent Performance

Citigroup (C) operates as a global financial services company with significant activities in consumer banking, credit cards, institutional clients, and markets. In recent market activity, the stock has shown resilience, posting year-to-date gains near 19 percent and one-year returns exceeding 60 percent, outpacing the broader market. The shares recently traded near the upper end of their 52-week range after reaching an all-time high in June. Positive analyst revisions, including raised price targets, and the company’s successful completion of the Federal Reserve stress test have supported sentiment. Upcoming second-quarter earnings, scheduled for mid-July, remain a near-term catalyst as investors monitor revenue trends in wealth management and investment banking.

Wells Fargo (WFC) Overview and Recent Performance

Wells Fargo (WFC) focuses primarily on U.S. consumer, commercial, and corporate banking, with additional emphasis on mortgage and credit-card products. The stock has recorded more modest year-to-date performance around 7 percent and one-year returns near 7 percent amid sector rotation and regulatory considerations. Shares have fluctuated within a wide 52-week range and recently sat in the middle of that band. Like its peer, Wells Fargo (WFC) cleared the Federal Reserve stress test, paving the way for an increased common dividend. Analyst commentary has included both target raises and neutral ratings ahead of second-quarter results, reflecting ongoing attention to net-interest-margin trends and deposit growth.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates the most suitable AI trading bots from hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating strong alignment with prevailing market conditions receive placement in this section. The platform’s top selections, drawn from 351 total bots, have shown annualized returns reaching up to 227 percent, win rates of 70–80 percent, and profit factors up to 2.5–3.0 in recent evaluations. Each bot employs distinct trading styles, timeframes, and ticker sets, allowing users to match strategies to their objectives. Review the curated list for data-driven insights into current opportunities.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Citigroup (C) maintains a globally diversified model with substantial exposure to investment banking and international consumer finance, providing leverage to economic recovery outside the United States. Wells Fargo (WFC) concentrates on domestic retail and commercial lending, offering more predictable fee income from core U.S. operations but limited geographic diversification. Recent momentum favors Citigroup (C), which has posted higher returns year-to-date, while Wells Fargo (WFC) trades at a comparatively lower valuation multiple. Risk factors include Citigroup (C)’s greater sensitivity to global market volatility and regulatory scrutiny in multiple jurisdictions, contrasted with Wells Fargo (WFC)’s lingering reputational considerations and slower deposit-growth trajectory. Market sentiment has improved for both following stress-test results, yet investors weigh Citigroup (C)’s growth catalysts against Wells Fargo (WFC)’s value characteristics.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable trend consistency, earnings momentum, and relative positioning, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability of outperformance to Citigroup (C) over the near term. The stock’s stronger recent returns, analyst upgrades, and diversified revenue streams contribute to this tilt, although Wells Fargo (WFC) retains appeal on valuation grounds and domestic stability. Outcomes remain subject to earnings delivery and broader market conditions.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
C vs. WFC commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is C is a Hold and WFC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (C: $140.79 vs. WFC: $87.16)
Brand notoriety: C and WFC are both notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: C: 75% vs. WFC: 45%
Market capitalization -- C: $239.99B vs. WFC: $268.29B
C [@Major Banks] is valued at $239.99B. WFC’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $268.29B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $896.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $209.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

C’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileWFC’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • C’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • WFC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, C is a better buy in the long-term than WFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

C’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • C’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • WFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WFC is a better buy in the short-term than C.

Price Growth

C (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.59% price change this week, while WFC (@Major Banks) price change was +1.93% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

C is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

WFC is expected to report earnings on Jul 14, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (-0.26% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
WFC($268B) has a higher market cap than C($240B). C has higher P/E ratio than WFC: C (17.39) vs WFC (13.55). C YTD gains are higher at: 21.786 vs. WFC (-4.931). WFC has more cash in the bank: 33.5B vs. C (23.7B). WFC has less debt than C: WFC (216B) vs C (380B). C (88.3B) and WFC (85B) have equivalent revenues.
CWFCC / WFC
Capitalization240B268B90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD21.786-4.931-442%
P/E Ratio17.3913.55128%
Revenue88.3B85B104%
Total Cash23.7B33.5B71%
Total Debt380B216B176%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
C vs WFC: Fundamental Ratings
C
WFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
63
Fair valued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1521
SMR RATING
1..100
34
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1451
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2859
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

C's Valuation (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (64) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (21) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's SMR Rating (3) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (4) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's Price Growth Rating (14) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is somewhat better than the same rating for WFC (51) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew somewhat faster than WFC’s over the last 12 months.

C's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as WFC (59) in the Major Banks industry. This means that C’s stock grew similarly to WFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
CWFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
C
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WFC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBSX0.880.02
+2.88%
FST Corp
AMZN247.311.97
+0.80%
Amazon.com
HR20.810.12
+0.58%
Healthcare Realty Trust
TRIN17.56-0.04
-0.23%
Trinity Capital
ALDF10.70-0.03
-0.28%
Aldel Finl II INC

C and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, C has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if C jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To C
1D Price
Change %
C100%
-0.06%
BAC - C
76%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
JPM - C
69%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
WFC - C
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.59%
EWBC - C
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.10%
BMO - C
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More

WFC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WFC has been closely correlated with BAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if WFC jumps, then BAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WFC
1D Price
Change %
WFC100%
+0.59%
BAC - WFC
80%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
EWBC - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.10%
JPM - WFC
67%
Closely correlated
-0.58%
C - WFC
64%
Loosely correlated
-0.06%
NTB - WFC
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.33%
More