Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BAFSX vs WCMNX
BAFSX vs WCMNX Comparison
Open Charts BAFSX vs WCMNX
BAFSX vs WCMNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BAFSX vs. WCMNX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAFSX is a Hold and WCMNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAFSX has more cash in the bank: 570M vs. WCMNX (53.8M). BAFSX (0.00) and WCMNX (0.00) have matching dividends . BAFSX was incepted earlier than WCMNX: BAFSX (24 years) vs WCMNX (7 years). WCMNX (2.04) is less costly to investors than BAFSX (0.96). WCMNX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 89.00 vs. BAFSX (28.00). WCMNX has a lower initial minimum investment than BAFSX: WCMNX (1000) vs BAFSX (1000000). WCMNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 26.77 vs. BAFSX (-1.16). WCMNX return over 5 years is better than : -1.36 vs. BAFSX (-29.83).
| BAFSX | WCMNX | BAFSX / WCMNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 1.24 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.96 | 2.04 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.287 | 12.177 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 1000000 | 1000 | 100,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 570M | 53.8M | 1,059% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.00 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.16 | 26.77 | -4% |
| Returns for 3 years | -0.91 | 31.26 | -3% |
| Returns for 5 years | -29.83 | -1.36 | 2,189% |
| Returns for 10 years | 41.66 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement