Advertisement
BALY vs FLL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALY is a Buy and FLL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BALY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BALY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BALY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLL’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BALY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- FLL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BALY (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а -5.23% price change this week, while FLL (@Casinos/Gaming) price change was -3.81% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was +0.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.92%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
BALY is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2025.
FLL is expected to report earnings on Aug 12, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (+0.81% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
| BALY | FLL | BALY / FLL | |
| Capitalization | 559M | 192M | 291% |
| EBITDA | 442M | 31.3M | 1,412% |
| Gain YTD | -48.351 | -25.735 | 188% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.68 | 43.29 | 52% |
| Revenue | 2.45B | 241M | 1,016% |
| Total Cash | 163M | 36.2M | 450% |
| Total Debt | 5.07B | 515M | 984% |
BALY | FLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 57 Fair valued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 86 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 92 | 89 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 73 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BALY's Valuation (57) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (68). This means that BALY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (86) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's SMR Rating (98) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (99). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's Price Growth Rating (89) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (92). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BALY (73). This means that FLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BALY’s over the last 12 months.
| BALY | FLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 82% | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 85% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 84% | 4 days ago 79% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 69% | 4 days ago 83% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 80% | 4 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 85% | 4 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 66% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 81% | 6 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 88% | 4 days ago 70% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| MNDFX | 8.24 | -0.05 | -0.60% |
| Manning & Napier Disciplined Value I | |||
| GICIX | 14.99 | -0.16 | -1.06% |
| Goldman Sachs Intl Sm Cp Insghts Instl | |||
| UIVPX | 12.31 | -0.16 | -1.28% |
| MFS Intrinsic Value R3 | |||
| QLSCX | 25.57 | -0.44 | -1.69% |
| Federated Hermes MDT Small Cap Core R6 | |||
| MSQLX | 11.24 | -0.20 | -1.75% |
| Morgan Stanley Inst International Eq L | |||
BALY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BALY and INSE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BALY and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BALY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALY | 100% | -2.63% | ||
| INSE - BALY | 32% Poorly correlated | -4.39% | ||
| MCRI - BALY | 31% Poorly correlated | -2.14% | ||
| FLL - BALY | 26% Poorly correlated | -6.77% | ||
| LNW - BALY | 25% Poorly correlated | -5.01% | ||
| IGT - BALY | 23% Poorly correlated | -3.12% | ||
More | ||||