Advertisement
BALY vs FLL
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BALY is a StrongBuy and FLL is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BALY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFLL’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BALY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- FLL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BALY’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FLL’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BALY’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
- FLL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BALY (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) experienced а -0.20% price change this week, while FLL (@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines) price change was -3.50% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines industry was -0.83%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.12%, and the average quarterly price growth was +14.08%.
Reported Earning Dates
BALY is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2025.
FLL is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Hotels/Resorts/Cruiselines (-0.83% weekly)The industry includes companies that operate and manage one or more of the following: lodging facilities (e.g. hotels and motels), resorts (e.g. ski resorts), spas, cruise ships and timeshare facilities. Marriott International, Inc., Carnival Corporation, Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc. and Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. are some of the biggest names in this industry.
| BALY | FLL | BALY / FLL | |
| Capitalization | 485M | 128M | 379% |
| EBITDA | -181.98M | 41.4M | -440% |
| Gain YTD | -44.830 | -12.255 | 366% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.48B | 298M | 833% |
| Total Cash | 175M | 32.1M | 545% |
| Total Debt | 5.7B | 525M | 1,086% |
BALY | FLL | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 72 | 4 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 59 Fair valued | 69 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 80 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 99 | 99 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 74 | 9 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BALY's Valuation (59) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as FLL (69). This means that BALY’s stock grew similarly to FLL’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's Profit vs Risk Rating (80) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (100). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's SMR Rating (99) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (99). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's Price Growth Rating (64) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is in the same range as BALY (64). This means that FLL’s stock grew similarly to BALY’s over the last 12 months.
FLL's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Casinos Or Gaming industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BALY (74). This means that FLL’s stock grew somewhat faster than BALY’s over the last 12 months.
| BALY | FLL | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 82% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 80% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 85% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 61% | 2 days ago 80% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 60% | 2 days ago 81% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 8 days ago 78% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 81% | 2 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 72% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 82% | 2 days ago 73% |
Advertisement
BALY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that BALY and INSE have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BALY and INSE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BALY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BALY | 100% | -0.80% | ||
| INSE - BALY | 32% Poorly correlated | -2.37% | ||
| LNW - BALY | 25% Poorly correlated | -4.59% | ||
| FLL - BALY | 24% Poorly correlated | -2.19% | ||
| BYD - BALY | 22% Poorly correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CZR - BALY | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.29% | ||
More | ||||
FLL and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FLL has been loosely correlated with CZR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 47% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FLL jumps, then CZR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FLL | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FLL | 100% | -2.19% | ||
| CZR - FLL | 47% Loosely correlated | -3.29% | ||
| GDEN - FLL | 47% Loosely correlated | -2.41% | ||
| INSE - FLL | 44% Loosely correlated | -2.37% | ||
| BYD - FLL | 40% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| PENN - FLL | 38% Loosely correlated | -1.29% | ||
More | ||||