BAM
Price
$47.44
Change
-$0.54 (-1.13%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
76.45B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$44.44
Change
-$0.30 (-0.67%)
Updated
Jun 18 closing price
Capitalization
110.08B
48 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BN

BAM vs BN Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. Brookfield Corporation (BN) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAM reported strong Q1 2026 results with fee-related earnings (FRE, a key measure of recurring revenue from management fees) up 11% year-over-year to $772 million and fee-bearing capital rising 12% to $614 billion.
  • BN, the parent company holding about 73% of BAM, shows positive YTD performance of around 2% versus BAM's slight decline, with recent monthly gains of approximately 8% for both amid market recovery.
  • BAM offers a higher dividend yield of 4.04% compared to BN's 0.59%, appealing to income-focused investors, while BN provides broader exposure to operating businesses in real estate, infrastructure, and renewables.
  • Recent momentum has lifted both stocks, with BAM up over 8% in the past month and BN showing similar gains, driven by alternative asset demand and capital raising success.
  • BAM trades at a lower P/E ratio of 31.90 versus BN's 96.08, reflecting its fee-based stability against BN's higher growth potential from diverse operations.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Brookfield Corporation (BN) represent interconnected pillars of the Brookfield ecosystem, with BN as the parent holding a majority stake in the asset management arm. This stock comparison is particularly relevant for investors seeking exposure to alternative assets like real estate, infrastructure, and renewables amid shifting interest rates and economic recovery signals. Traders monitoring relative performance will find value in their contrasting models: BAM's fee-driven stability versus BN's broader operating leverage. Recent market activity highlights opportunities in their growth trajectories and valuations.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) is a leading global alternative asset manager with over $1 trillion in assets under management, focusing on real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, private equity, and credit. In recent weeks, BAM has shown resilience, posting an 8.53% gain over the past month amid broader market upticks, though year-to-date returns stand at around -5% due to earlier pressures from rate sensitivity. Q1 2026 results bolstered sentiment, with fee-related earnings up 11% to $772 million and distributable earnings (DE, cash available for distribution) at $702 million, supported by $21 billion in quarterly capital raises bringing fee-bearing capital to $614 billion, up 12% year-over-year. Trading around $49.76 with a market cap of $81.5 billion, BAM's performance reflects strong fundraising momentum and high-margin FRE growth, offsetting YTD headwinds in a volatile environment for asset managers.

BN Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Corporation (BN) operates as a multi-asset alternative manager and investor, with core businesses in real estate, infrastructure, renewables, private equity, and wealth solutions, managing vast portfolios globally. Recent market activity has driven BN higher by about 7.76% over the past month, with YTD gains near 2.6%, outperforming BAM amid recovery in real assets. At approximately $47.08 and a $105 billion market cap, the stock benefits from its 73% ownership in BAM and direct investments, though higher leverage (debt-to-equity at 164%) introduces volatility. Sentiment has improved on nuclear ventures, legal settlements, and capital deployment across sectors, positioning BN for leveraged upside in infrastructure and transition assets during recent economic shifts.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page curates the top 25 performers from over 350 AI trading bots that analyze thousands of tickers across stocks, ETFs, and crypto. These bots employ diverse strategies like trend-following, AI/ML pattern recognition, and take-profit/stop-loss corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL), with timeframes from 15 minutes to 46 days. Standout stats include annualized returns up to +285% (Space Infrastructure bot), win rates reaching 88% (ProShares UltraPro Russell2000), and profit factors as high as 11.70 (GS finance bot). Whether short-term scalps or longer holds in sectors like semiconductors, industrials, or data centers, these bots adapt to current conditions. Explore the curated selection to identify signals matching your style and enhance your trading edge.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAM and BN share sector exposure in alternatives but diverge in models: BAM's pure asset management yields high FRE margins (around 61%) and lower debt (26% debt-to-equity), prioritizing stability and capital inflows, while BN blends management with operating businesses for revenue scale ($77B vs. $5B) but higher leverage and volatility (beta 1.85 vs. 1.25). Growth drivers favor BAM's 15%+ EPS potential from fundraising, against BN's asset monetization in renewables and infrastructure. Recent momentum is comparable (8% monthly gains), but BN edges YTD. Risks include rate sensitivity for both, amplified for BN by operations; sentiment leans positive on BAM's earnings beat and BN's diversification, with BAM at premium valuation (P/E 32) versus BN's apparent discount.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Tickeron's AI currently favors BAM for its superior trend consistency in recent weeks, evidenced by robust FRE growth and capital raises amid alternative asset tailwinds, alongside lower risk profile and attractive yield. While BN offers compelling long-term catalysts through its operating portfolio, BAM's relative stability and positioning suggest higher probability of near-term outperformance in the current environment.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.

VS
BAM vs. BN commentary
Jun 19, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and BN is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 19, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $47.98 vs. BN: $44.74)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 114% vs. BN: 91%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $76.45B vs. BN: $110.08B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $76.45B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $110.08B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $163.01B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.28B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 7 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +4.99% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.45% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.94%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($110B) has a higher market cap than BAM($76.5B). BN has higher P/E ratio than BAM: BN (87.14) vs BAM (30.41). BN YTD gains are higher at: -2.180 vs. BAM (-6.505). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 33.1B vs. BAM (3.46B). BAM has less debt than BN: BAM (3.83B) vs BN (264B). BN has higher revenues than BAM: BN (75.7B) vs BAM (4.77B).
BAMBNBAM / BN
Capitalization76.5B110B70%
EBITDA3.46B33.1B10%
Gain YTD-6.505-2.180298%
P/E Ratio30.4187.1435%
Revenue4.77B75.7B6%
Total Cash1.1BN/A-
Total Debt3.83B264B1%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1071
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
86
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9432
SMR RATING
1..100
3290
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5550
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
7696
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5090

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (86) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (32) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (94) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (90) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (55) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (76) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (96) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TRDA6.810.31
+4.77%
Entrada Therapeutics
RYOJ2.380.04
+1.71%
rYojbaba Co. Ltd.
PH945.977.46
+0.79%
Parker-Hannifin Corp
KLIC116.30-0.76
-0.65%
Kulicke and Soffa Industries
WYFI33.52-2.13
-5.97%
WhiteFiber Inc

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-1.24%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-2.04%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
ARES - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-4.91%
TPG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-4.66%
More

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-2.04%
BAM - BN
86%
Closely correlated
-1.24%
CG - BN
73%
Closely correlated
-2.43%
KKR - BN
71%
Closely correlated
-1.82%
BX - BN
71%
Closely correlated
-2.24%
ARES - BN
68%
Closely correlated
-4.91%
More