BAM
Price
$52.07
Change
+$0.76 (+1.48%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
83.52B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BN
Price
$46.59
Change
+$0.55 (+1.19%)
Updated
Nov 26 closing price
Capitalization
104.12B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BN

Header iconBAM vs BN Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs BNBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$52.07
Change+$0.76 (+1.48%)
Volume$2.45M
Capitalization83.52B
Brookfield
Price$46.59
Change+$0.55 (+1.19%)
Volume$2.4M
Capitalization104.12B
BAM vs BN Comparison Chart in %
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. BN commentary
Nov 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and BN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 27, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $52.07 vs. BN: $46.59)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 107% vs. BN: 61%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $83.52B vs. BN: $104.12B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $83.52B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $104.12B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $161.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +2.80% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +6.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.31%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.47%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($104B) has a higher market cap than BAM($83.5B). BN has higher P/E ratio than BAM: BN (151.92) vs BAM (33.59). BN YTD gains are higher at: 22.663 vs. BAM (-1.685). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. BAM (970M). BAM has less debt than BN: BAM (1.25B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than BAM: BN (76.1B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMBNBAM / BN
Capitalization83.5B104B80%
EBITDA970M30.3B3%
Gain YTD-1.68522.663-7%
P/E Ratio33.59151.9222%
Revenue835M76.1B1%
Total Cash480MN/A-
Total Debt1.25B251B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1318
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
20
Undervalued
92
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5516
SMR RATING
1..100
5685
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7548
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8625
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (20) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for BN (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (16) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (55) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (85) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (75) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (25) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (86) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
86%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 24 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASGI21.830.43
+2.01%
abrdn Global Infrastructure Income Fund
SCHM29.950.19
+0.64%
Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF™
GIND26.760.17
+0.64%
Goldman Sachs India Equity ETF
YJUN25.180.11
+0.44%
FT Vest Intl Eq Mod Bf ETF June
XAUG37.060.11
+0.29%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Enh & ModBufETF-Aug

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
+1.19%
BAM - BN
86%
Closely correlated
+1.48%
JHG - BN
82%
Closely correlated
+1.52%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.02%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+1.04%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-0.27%
More