BAM
Price
$60.39
Change
+$0.17 (+0.28%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
96.96B
BN
Price
$65.46
Change
-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
97.51B
77 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BN

Header iconBAM vs BN Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs BNBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$60.39
Change+$0.17 (+0.28%)
Volume$3.31M
Capitalization96.96B
Brookfield
Price$65.46
Change-$0.03 (-0.05%)
Volume$5.41M
Capitalization97.51B
BAM vs BN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. BN commentary
Aug 28, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and BN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $60.39 vs. BN: $65.46)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 147% vs. BN: 223%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $96.96B vs. BN: $97.51B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $96.96B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $97.51B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $175.24B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.66B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than BN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than BN.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +1.72% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was +2.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.13%, and the average quarterly price growth was +17.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($97.5B) and BAM($97B) have the same market capitalization . BN has higher P/E ratio than BAM: BN (148.84) vs BAM (42.23). BN YTD gains are higher at: 14.327 vs. BAM (13.204). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. BAM (970M). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. BAM (480M). BAM has less debt than BN: BAM (1.25B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than BAM: BN (76.1B) vs BAM (835M).
BAMBNBAM / BN
Capitalization97B97.5B99%
EBITDA970M30.3B3%
Gain YTD13.20414.32792%
P/E Ratio42.23148.8428%
Revenue835M76.1B1%
Total Cash480M22.9B2%
Total Debt1.25B251B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6063
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
21
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4923
SMR RATING
1..100
5690
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5049
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3612
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (21) in the null industry is in the same range as BN (33) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (49) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (56) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (90) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (50) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BN's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (36) in the null industry. This means that BN’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
77%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
53%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 17 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
51%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
VDE125.351.39
+1.12%
Vanguard Energy ETF
GSSC74.620.48
+0.65%
Goldman Sachs ActiveBeta® US SmCp Eq ETF
OCIO36.37N/A
N/A
ClearShares OCIO ETF
PUTD21.00N/A
N/A
Cboe(R) Validus S&P 500(R) Dyn PtwIdxETF
ROPE26.09N/A
N/A
Coastal Compass 100 ETF

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-0.05%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.88%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
+0.12%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
+0.98%
More