BAM
Price
$58.57
Change
-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
SII
Price
$43.32
Change
-$0.06 (-0.14%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
964.89M
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs SII

Header iconBAM vs SII Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs SIIBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$58.57
Change-$1.73 (-2.87%)
Volume$2.42M
Capitalization16.34B
Sprott
Price$43.32
Change-$0.06 (-0.14%)
Volume$140.79K
Capitalization964.89M
BAM vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. SII commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $58.57 vs. SII: $43.32)
Brand notoriety: BAM and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 181% vs. SII: 184%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. SII: $964.89M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SII is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -2.11% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.08%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.71%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

SII is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than SII($965M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than SII: BAM (37.12) vs SII (23.24). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 8.083 vs. SII (2.727). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. SII (57.2M). SII has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. BAM (9M). SII has less debt than BAM: SII (24.2M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than SII: BAM (383M) vs SII (141M).
BAMSIIBAM / SII
Capitalization16.3B965M1,689%
EBITDA522M57.2M913%
Gain YTD8.0832.727296%
P/E Ratio37.1223.24160%
Revenue383M141M272%
Total Cash9M22.9M39%
Total Debt256M24.2M1,058%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8272
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
35
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4936
SMR RATING
1..100
5255
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4152
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3147
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (35). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (49). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (55). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (52). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (31) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (47). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
63%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
72%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
71%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bearish Trend 12 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
69%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
SINT5.310.51
+10.62%
SiNtx Technologies Inc.
FORA2.41-0.09
-3.66%
Forian
EXP224.18-8.75
-3.76%
Eagle Materials
DAVA26.02-2.28
-8.06%
Endava plc
ACCO4.56-0.96
-17.39%
Acco Brands Corp

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 79% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-2.87%
BN - BAM
79%
Closely correlated
-1.95%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-3.37%
CG - BAM
66%
Closely correlated
-3.48%
APAM - BAM
62%
Loosely correlated
-3.92%
SEIC - BAM
62%
Loosely correlated
-2.42%
More

SII and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SII has been loosely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SII jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SII
1D Price
Change %
SII100%
-0.14%
BN - SII
45%
Loosely correlated
-1.95%
IVZ - SII
40%
Loosely correlated
-2.13%
BK - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
BAM - SII
39%
Loosely correlated
-2.87%
PX - SII
38%
Loosely correlated
-0.54%
More