BAM
Price
$55.57
Change
+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
SII
Price
$41.96
Change
-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
964.89M
32 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs SII

Header iconBAM vs SII Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs SIIBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$55.57
Change+$0.53 (+0.96%)
Volume$550.38K
Capitalization16.34B
Sprott
Price$41.96
Change-$0.01 (-0.02%)
Volume$96.11K
Capitalization964.89M
BAM vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. SII commentary
Jan 21, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and SII is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 21, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $55.57 vs. SII: $41.96)
Brand notoriety: BAM and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 61% vs. SII: 108%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. SII: $964.89M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.97B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than SII.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.72% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +1.94% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.49%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.41%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

SII is expected to report earnings on May 09, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.49% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than SII($965M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than SII: BAM (37.12) vs SII (23.24). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 2.547 vs. SII (-0.498). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. SII (57.2M). SII has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. BAM (9M). SII has less debt than BAM: SII (24.2M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than SII: BAM (383M) vs SII (141M).
BAMSIIBAM / SII
Capitalization16.3B965M1,689%
EBITDA522M57.2M913%
Gain YTD2.547-0.498-511%
P/E Ratio37.1223.24160%
Revenue383M141M272%
Total Cash9M22.9M39%
Total Debt256M24.2M1,058%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
34
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4736
SMR RATING
1..100
5256
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4155
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2061
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (34). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (47). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (56). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (41) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (55). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SII (61). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
73%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
79%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
69%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 15 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
TCRT1.800.07
+4.05%
Alaunos Therapeutics Inc.
QGEN46.000.10
+0.22%
Qiagen NV
BYND4.08-0.10
-2.39%
Beyond Meat
BBAR21.89-0.83
-3.65%
Banco BBVA Argentina SA
GMGI2.04-0.15
-6.85%
Golden Matrix Group