BAM
Price
$56.63
Change
-$0.24 (-0.42%)
Updated
May 9, 12:22 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
16.34B
SII
Price
$55.67
Change
+$1.83 (+3.40%)
Updated
May 9, 02:23 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
964.89M
89 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs SII

Header iconBAM vs SII Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs SIIBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$56.63
Change-$0.24 (-0.42%)
Volume$900
Capitalization16.34B
Sprott
Price$55.67
Change+$1.83 (+3.40%)
Volume$100
Capitalization964.89M
BAM vs SII Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. SII commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and SII is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $56.87 vs. SII: $53.84)
Brand notoriety: BAM and SII are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 103% vs. SII: 94%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. SII: $964.89M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. SII’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $964.89M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.99B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSII’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SII’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and SII are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 7 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SII’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • SII’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than SII.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а +6.82% price change this week, while SII (@Investment Managers) price change was +4.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.57%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Mar 17, 2025.

SII is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.53% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than SII($965M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than SII: BAM (37.12) vs SII (23.24). SII YTD gains are higher at: 28.537 vs. BAM (5.769). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. SII (57.2M). SII has more cash in the bank: 22.9M vs. BAM (9M). SII has less debt than BAM: SII (24.2M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than SII: BAM (383M) vs SII (141M).
BAMSIIBAM / SII
Capitalization16.3B965M1,689%
EBITDA522M57.2M913%
Gain YTD5.76928.53720%
P/E Ratio37.1223.24160%
Revenue383M141M272%
Total Cash9M22.9M39%
Total Debt256M24.2M1,058%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs SII: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
SII
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2081
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
39
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4728
SMR RATING
1..100
5254
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4137
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3439
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (39). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Profit vs Risk Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (47). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (54). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

SII's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (41). This means that SII’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as SII (39). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SII’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMSII
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SII
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FHN19.260.66
+3.55%
First Horizon Corp
AMSC21.390.67
+3.23%
American Superconductor Corp
TMQ1.630.03
+1.87%
Trilogy Metals
DRH7.500.10
+1.35%
DiamondRock Hospitality Company
AGNCM24.85N/A
N/A
AGNC Investment Corp

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+1.90%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
+3.08%
BX - BAM
79%
Closely correlated
+2.70%
CG - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+3.28%
KKR - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+2.17%
ARES - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+2.33%
More