BAM
Price
$46.63
Change
-$0.09 (-0.19%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
74.24B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KKR
Price
$96.91
Change
-$0.03 (-0.03%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
87.01B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs KKR

BAM vs KKR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. KKR & Co. (KKR) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Both BAM and KKR operate as leading alternative asset managers with substantial assets under management (AUM) exceeding $1 trillion each.
  • BAM emphasizes diversified exposure across real estate, infrastructure, credit, and private equity, supported by a higher dividend yield.
  • KKR has shown stronger year-to-date momentum in certain periods amid active deal-making in renewables and strategic platforms.
  • Recent market activity reflects sector-wide pressures on alternative asset managers, with performance influenced by interest rate expectations and fundraising trends.
  • Risk profiles differ: BAM offers relative stability through fee-bearing capital, while KKR carries higher sensitivity to private equity cycles and market sentiment.
  • Market positioning highlights trade-offs between yield-focused stability at BAM and growth-oriented catalysts at KKR.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) and KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) represent two prominent players in the alternative asset management sector. Investors and traders often compare these stocks to assess relative positioning in private equity, credit, real estate, and infrastructure strategies amid evolving market conditions. This analysis appeals to institutional allocators, high-net-worth individuals, and active traders seeking to understand differences in business models, recent performance drivers, and risk-return profiles. The comparison draws on verifiable developments from recent weeks to provide a balanced view of how each company navigates broader economic factors such as interest rates and capital deployment opportunities.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) is a global alternative asset manager with over $1 trillion in total AUM and approximately $600 billion in fee-bearing capital across infrastructure, energy, private equity, real estate, and credit. The firm serves primarily institutional clients and maintains a diversified geographic footprint. In recent market activity, BAM shares have exhibited measured responses to sector dynamics, with performance influenced by steady fee income and capital deployment in real assets. Sentiment has been supported by consistent dividend distributions and the firm's scale in fee-generating strategies, though broader market volatility in alternatives has tempered gains. Recent weeks have highlighted resilience tied to long-duration asset exposure rather than short-term trading catalysts.

KKR Overview and Recent Performance

KKR & Co. Inc. (KKR) is a major alternative asset manager focused on private equity, credit, and infrastructure investments, with a significant global presence. The company manages substantial AUM and actively pursues strategic transactions. In recent market activity, KKR has been shaped by announcements involving renewables platforms, acquisitions, and new investment vehicles, contributing to shifts in investor attention. Performance has reflected a mix of deal momentum and sensitivity to equity market fluctuations, with recent weeks showing variable responses to fundraising updates and sector rotation. Sentiment remains tied to the pace of capital deployment and macroeconomic factors affecting private markets.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of AI-powered trading bots designed for various market conditions. Tickeron offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, yet only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing trends, robust backtested statistics, and suitable risk parameters earn placement in this section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, with many reporting win rates in ranges such as 55-75% and varying profit factors depending on the model. Users can explore detailed statistics on returns, drawdowns, and trade frequency to identify options matching their objectives. This resource provides an informational overview for those interested in automated trading approaches. Visit Trending AI Robots to review current selections.

Head-to-Head Comparison

BAM and KKR share core exposure to alternative investments but differ in emphasis. BAM maintains broader diversification across real assets and infrastructure, supporting more stable fee income streams, whereas KKR leans into private equity and opportunistic credit with potentially higher cyclical sensitivity. Recent momentum has favored KKR in periods of active deal flow, while BAM has benefited from yield characteristics and scale in fee-bearing AUM. Risk factors include interest rate impacts on valuations for both, though BAM may exhibit lower volatility due to its asset mix. Sector exposure overlaps significantly in alternatives, yet market sentiment has oscillated based on capital raising success and portfolio performance disclosures. Trade-offs center on BAM’s defensive profile versus KKR’s growth-oriented transaction pipeline.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, relative stability in fee-based revenues, and positioning amid recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a probabilistic edge to KKR for near-term momentum considerations. Catalysts including strategic deployments in renewables and infrastructure appear to support this tilt, though BAM retains appeal for yield-oriented positioning. Outcomes remain subject to evolving market conditions and broader sector dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAM vs. KKR commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and KKR is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $46.63 vs. KKR: $96.91)
Brand notoriety: BAM and KKR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 51% vs. KKR: 64%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $74.24B vs. KKR: $87.01B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $74.24B. KKR’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $87.01B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $159.89B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $9.26B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileKKR’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • KKR’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than KKR.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KKR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • KKR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KKR is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.79% price change this week, while KKR (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.61%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.43%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.98%.

Reported Earning Dates

KKR is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-2.61% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KKR($87B) has a higher market cap than BAM($74.2B). KKR has higher P/E ratio than BAM: KKR (32.96) vs BAM (29.89). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -9.135 vs. KKR (-23.692). KKR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 9.89B vs. BAM (3.46B). KKR has more cash in the bank: 132B vs. BAM (1.1B). BAM has less debt than KKR: BAM (3.83B) vs KKR (54.6B). KKR has higher revenues than BAM: KKR (20.4B) vs BAM (4.77B).
BAMKKRBAM / KKR
Capitalization74.2B87B85%
EBITDA3.46B9.89B35%
Gain YTD-9.135-23.69239%
P/E Ratio29.8932.9691%
Revenue4.77B20.4B23%
Total Cash1.1B132B1%
Total Debt3.83B54.6B7%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs KKR: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
KKR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
713
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
80
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
9868
SMR RATING
1..100
3270
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5861
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8191
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for KKR (80) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew significantly faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

KKR's Profit vs Risk Rating (68) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (98) in the null industry. This means that KKR’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for KKR (70) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as KKR (61) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as KKR (91) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to KKR’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMKKR
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
67%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KKR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSHD54.871.33
+2.48%
Goosehead Insurance
IBP222.53-2.60
-1.15%
Installed Building Products
BCG1.48-0.02
-1.33%
Binah Capital Group
HDSN6.20-0.25
-3.88%
Hudson Technologies
VRT305.87-12.99
-4.07%
Vertiv Holdings Co

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-0.19%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
BX - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
ARES - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
TPG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
More

KKR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KKR has been closely correlated with BX. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KKR jumps, then BX could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KKR
1D Price
Change %
KKR100%
-0.03%
BX - KKR
84%
Closely correlated
-0.85%
ARES - KKR
82%
Closely correlated
-1.12%
APO - KKR
80%
Closely correlated
-1.25%
TPG - KKR
78%
Closely correlated
-0.45%
CG - KKR
76%
Closely correlated
-1.27%
More