BAM
Price
$46.33
Change
+$0.62 (+1.36%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
72.91B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BX
Price
$129.97
Change
+$5.47 (+4.39%)
Updated
Jul 24, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
99.59B
83 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BX

BAM vs BX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
Jul 20, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. Blackstone (BX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Blackstone (BX) are leading alternative asset managers with substantial assets under management (AUM) and exposure to private markets, infrastructure, and real estate.
  • Market capitalization stands higher for Blackstone (BX) at approximately $158 billion compared to Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) at roughly $78 billion, reflecting differences in scale.
  • Year-to-date total returns through early July 2026 showed variation, with one comparison indicating stronger performance for Blackstone (BX) relative to Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) in certain periods, while longer-term views highlighted outperformance by Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) over 12 months in other analyses.
  • Both companies exhibit similar price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios in the low 30s range, with Blackstone (BX) generating higher revenues but carrying greater debt levels.
  • Technical indicators from comparison tools suggest Blackstone (BX) may hold a slight edge in short-term momentum, while both stocks receive neutral long-term fundamental assessments.
  • Sector exposure centers on alternative investments, where interest rate environments and capital deployment opportunities influence relative positioning for both firms.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Blackstone (BX) represent two prominent players in the alternative asset management sector, offering investors exposure to private equity, real estate, infrastructure, and credit strategies. This comparison examines their business models, recent market activity, and relative positioning to assist traders and investors evaluating allocation decisions within the financial services industry. Market participants focused on growth in private markets, sensitivity to macroeconomic factors such as interest rates, and differentiation in scale or strategy may find this analysis relevant for portfolio construction or tactical adjustments.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) operates as a global alternative asset manager with a diversified portfolio spanning real estate, infrastructure, renewable power, and private equity. Recent market activity has reflected broader sector dynamics, including investor responses to interest rate expectations and capital flows into private investments. Performance metrics indicate mixed results in recent weeks, with the stock navigating volatility tied to macroeconomic data releases and sector sentiment. Fundamentals highlight a focus on organic AUM growth from a comparatively lower base, supporting discussions around valuation multiples relative to peers. Overall positioning emphasizes stability in fee-generating assets amid evolving market conditions.

BX Overview and Recent Performance

Blackstone (BX) stands as one of the largest alternative asset managers globally, with significant operations in private equity, real estate, credit, and infrastructure. Recent market activity has been shaped by capital deployment trends and investor appetite for alternative strategies during periods of economic uncertainty. Performance indicators show variability, with comparisons noting stronger year-to-date returns in select analyses alongside broader sector pressures. The firm maintains a larger revenue base and market capitalization, accompanied by higher debt levels compared to certain peers. Sentiment reflects ongoing evaluation of growth opportunities in private markets balanced against macroeconomic influences.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated selection of AI trading bots on its Trending AI Robots page. The platform offers hundreds of AI Trading Bots that trade thousands of different tickers, with only the best and most suitable for current market conditions featured in this section. Available bots display a range of performance statistics, including varying win rates, profit factors, and drawdown metrics depending on strategy and timeframe. Each bot employs distinct trading styles, strategies, timeframes, and sets of tickers, allowing users to explore options aligned with specific objectives. For additional details on these tools, visit the Trending AI Robots page.

Head-to-Head Comparison

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Blackstone (BX) both operate alternative asset management models centered on fee income from AUM, yet differ in scale and emphasis. Blackstone (BX) benefits from greater overall size and revenue generation, while Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) pursues AUM expansion from a smaller starting point, potentially supporting differential growth trajectories. Recent momentum varies by timeframe, with technical assessments occasionally favoring one over the other in short-term signals. Risk factors include exposure to interest rate fluctuations, regulatory changes in private markets, and liquidity considerations in underlying assets. Sector exposure remains comparable, though market sentiment can shift based on individual firm catalysts such as fundraising success or portfolio performance. Trade-offs involve weighing Blackstone (BX)’s established scale against Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)’s potential for accelerated growth in select segments.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors including trend consistency, relative stability, and positioning within alternative asset management, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign a probabilistic preference toward Blackstone (BX) in short-term technical evaluations, while noting Brookfield Asset Management (BAM)’s attributes in longer-term fundamental comparisons. This assessment draws from available performance differentials and market data without implying certainty or specific outcomes.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAM vs. BX commentary
Jul 25, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Buy and BX is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 25, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $45.71 vs. BX: $124.50)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 114% vs. BX: 143%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $72.91B vs. BX: $99.59B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $72.91B. BX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $99.59B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $160.76B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileBX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, BX is a better buy in the long-term than BAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • BX’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BX is a better buy in the short-term than BAM.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -7.79% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was -3.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -3.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.29%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.26%.

Reported Earning Dates

BX is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-3.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BX($99.6B) has a higher market cap than BAM($72.9B). BAM has higher P/E ratio than BX: BAM (29.30) vs BX (27.85). BAM YTD gains are higher at: -10.928 vs. BX (-17.533). BAM has less debt than BX: BAM (3.83B) vs BX (14.2B). BX has higher revenues than BAM: BX (12.6B) vs BAM (4.77B).
BAMBXBAM / BX
Capitalization72.9B99.6B73%
EBITDA3.46BN/A-
Gain YTD-10.928-17.53362%
P/E Ratio29.3027.85105%
Revenue4.77B12.6B38%
Total Cash1.1BN/A-
Total Debt3.83B14.2B27%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BX: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
630
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
13
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10073
SMR RATING
1..100
3229
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7060
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BX's Valuation (13) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (14) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BX's Profit vs Risk Rating (73) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (100) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BX's SMR Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (32) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BX's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (70) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BX (92) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
69%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CMI665.034.28
+0.65%
Cummins
ARL14.740.04
+0.27%
American Realty Investors
CCO2.41N/A
N/A
Clear Channel Outdoor Holdings
CWST90.03-0.40
-0.44%
Casella Waste Systems
WIMI1.15-0.06
-4.96%
WiMi Hologram Cloud Inc

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-1.51%
BN - BAM
86%
Closely correlated
-1.44%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
BX - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+1.37%
ARES - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
TPG - BAM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More

BX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BX
1D Price
Change %
BX100%
+1.37%
KKR - BX
83%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
APO - BX
81%
Closely correlated
-0.03%
ARES - BX
78%
Closely correlated
+1.43%
CG - BX
76%
Closely correlated
+0.75%
TPG - BX
75%
Closely correlated
+0.57%
More