BAM
Price
$44.85
Change
+$0.29 (+0.65%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
71.02B
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BX
Price
$111.70
Change
-$0.54 (-0.48%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
91.41B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BAM vs BX

BAM vs BX Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Sep 21, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) vs. Blackstone (BX) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • BAM and BX are leading alternative asset managers with substantial assets under management (AUM), though BX maintains a larger scale at over $1.3 trillion in total AUM compared to BAM's approximately $1.27 trillion.
  • Both stocks have experienced downward pressure in recent weeks, with BAM trading near $46 and BX near $125 as of mid-September 2026, reflecting broader market sentiment toward alternative investments.
  • BAM has reported record fundraising of $163 billion in the past twelve months and is targeting 14% compound annual growth rate (CAGR) in fee-bearing capital through 2031.
  • BX benefits from diversified exposure across private equity, real estate, and credit, with recent analyst targets implying upside potential amid improving market conditions.
  • Relative performance shows BAM with somewhat more stable recent price action compared to BX's sharper year-to-date declines, though both trade at premium valuations typical of the sector.
  • Market positioning favors BAM for infrastructure and renewable focus, while BX emphasizes private equity and credit strategies.

Introduction

Brookfield Asset Management (BAM) and Blackstone (BX) represent two of the largest players in the alternative asset management industry. Investors and traders often compare these stocks due to their exposure to private markets, fee-based revenue models, and sensitivity to interest rates and economic cycles. This analysis appeals to those seeking insights into relative performance, business model differences, and positioning within the financial sector amid evolving market conditions.

BAM Overview and Recent Performance

Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. specializes in alternative investments, including infrastructure, renewables, private equity, and real estate, with fee-earning AUM reaching approximately $672 billion as of mid-2026. The firm has demonstrated strong momentum through record fundraising and strategic partnerships, including expansions in AI-related infrastructure. In recent weeks, BAM shares have traded in a range influenced by broader sector rotation and valuation adjustments, closing around $46.06 on September 18, 2026, after modest gains amid fluctuating volumes. Sentiment has been supported by earnings growth projections and a targeted 15% annual dividend increase, though the stock has faced pressure from peer multiple contractions.

BX Overview and Recent Performance

Blackstone Inc. operates as the world's largest alternative asset manager, with total AUM exceeding $1.3 trillion and fee-earning AUM at $961.6 billion as of June 2026. Its portfolio spans private equity, real estate, credit, and insurance solutions. In recent market activity, BX shares have reflected volatility tied to realization timing and rate environments, closing at $124.96 on September 18, 2026. The stock has seen declines year-to-date amid sector-wide adjustments, yet analyst consensus points to upside from current levels, bolstered by management fee growth and performance income potential in stabilizing markets.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of high-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds available across thousands of tickers. Only those demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested results, and robust risk metrics earn placement in this section. Available bots exhibit varied performance ranges, with many achieving annualized returns between 15% and 40%+ in optimized scenarios, alongside differing Sharpe ratios, drawdown profiles, and trading frequencies. These systems cover diverse strategies, timeframes from intraday to long-term, and ticker sets tailored to equities, options, and more. Traders seeking data-driven approaches may explore the Trending AI Robots page for further details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

In business model terms, BAM emphasizes long-duration infrastructure and renewable assets with a focus on permanent capital vehicles, while BX prioritizes scalable private equity and credit strategies that generate performance fees. Growth drivers differ accordingly: BAM benefits from AI and energy transition themes, whereas BX leverages broader alternative deployment across real assets. Recent momentum has favored BAM with relatively contained drawdowns compared to BX's larger percentage declines. Risk factors include interest rate sensitivity for both, though BX's higher beta reflects greater volatility. Sector exposure tilts BAM toward infrastructure resilience and BX toward cyclical private markets. Overall market sentiment remains constructive on fundamentals but cautious on valuations for the pair.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency in fee-related earnings, relative stability amid sector pressure, and positioning in resilient growth areas like infrastructure, Tickeron’s AI models currently assign a modestly higher probability to BAM over BX in the near term. This assessment incorporates backtested patterns favoring steadier capital deployment and lower drawdown profiles, though outcomes remain probabilistic and subject to evolving market dynamics.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
BAM vs. BX commentary
Oct 02, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a Hold and BX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs BX: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
BX
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6256
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
11
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
2932
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6164
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8488
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3775

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BX's Valuation (11) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (14) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BX's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (100) in the null industry. This means that BX’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (29) in the null industry is in the same range as BX (32) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the null industry is in the same range as BX (64) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (84) in the null industry is in the same range as BX (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to BX’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMBX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 30 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 02, 2026
Stock price -- (BAM: $44.56 vs. BX: $112.24)
Brand notoriety: BAM and BX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 177% vs. BX: 139%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $71.02B vs. BX: $91.41B
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $71.02B. BX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $91.41B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $57 to $165.9B. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $8.63B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while BX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • BX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BAM and BX are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than BX.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.04% price change this week, while BX (@Investment Managers) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +1.16%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BX is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+1.16% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BX
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ORRF41.030.45
+1.11%
Orrstown Financial Services
SKYW97.690.77
+0.79%
SkyWest
SKYX1.14-0.01
-0.87%
SKYX Platforms Corp
ALNY231.18-15.56
-6.31%
Alnylam Pharmaceuticals
FLUX0.41-0.04
-9.82%
Flux Power Holdings

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 85% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
-0.04%
BN - BAM
85%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
KKR - BAM
75%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
BX - BAM
73%
Closely correlated
+0.13%
ARES - BAM
72%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
TPG - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More

BX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BX has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 83% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BX jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BX
1D Price
Change %
BX100%
+0.13%
KKR - BX
83%
Closely correlated
-0.07%
ARES - BX
80%
Closely correlated
+0.34%
CG - BX
76%
Closely correlated
+1.84%
APO - BX
75%
Closely correlated
-1.48%
TPG - BX
75%
Closely correlated
+1.36%
More