Advertisement
ARES vs BAM
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Ares Management Corporation (ARES) vs. Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- Both ARES and BAM operate as alternative asset managers but differ in focus: ARES emphasizes credit strategies, while BAM prioritizes real assets and infrastructure.
- In recent market activity, BAM has posted modest gains of around 5-9% over the past month, outperforming ARES's similar but more volatile 4-6% rise.
- Year-to-date, both stocks have faced headwinds, with ARES down approximately 30% and BAM down about 10%.
- BAM benefits from over $1 trillion in AUM (assets under management), providing scale advantages over ARES's platform.
- Recent earnings beats for BAM in Q4 2025 highlight resilient fee-based revenue growth.
- Market sentiment favors BAM slightly in short-term comparisons due to steadier momentum.
Introduction
As leading players in the alternative asset management space, ARES and BAM offer investors exposure to high-growth areas like private credit and infrastructure. This stock comparison analyzes their business models, recent performance, and market positioning amid shifting interest rates and economic uncertainty. Traders seeking momentum plays and long-term investors eyeing fee-based revenue streams will find value in understanding their relative strengths, risks, and trends in the current environment.
ARES Overview and Recent Performance
Ares Management Corporation (ARES) is a global alternative investment manager specializing in credit, private equity, real estate, and infrastructure, with a strong emphasis on direct lending to middle-market companies. Its asset-light model generates stable management fees and performance income. In recent market activity, ARES stock has exhibited volatility, rising about 4-6% over the past month but pulling back from intraday peaks near $123 to around $112 amid broader sector pressures. Sentiment has been influenced by concerns over private credit valuations and interest rate sensitivity, though analysts maintain a hold rating with targets near $114. Year-to-date declines of roughly 30% reflect macroeconomic headwinds, offset partially by resilient credit quality.
BAM Overview and Recent Performance
Brookfield Asset Management Ltd. (BAM) manages over $1 trillion in AUM across real estate, renewable power, infrastructure, and private equity, leveraging a perpetual capital model for long-term value creation. Its fee-related earnings provide predictability in volatile markets. Recent weeks have seen BAM gain 5-9% over the past month, trading around $47 after modest pullbacks, supported by record 2025 results and Q4 earnings beats. Positive sentiment stems from real estate portfolio activity and dividend hikes, though year-to-date losses of about 10% mirror sector-wide caution on real assets exposure.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases the top-performing AI trading bots from a library of hundreds that trade thousands of tickers across various strategies, timeframes, and styles like swing trading, scalping, and long-term holds. Only 25 elite bots out of 351 total are curated here based on current market suitability, featuring win rates often exceeding 60%, profit factors above 1.5, and thousands of backtested trades with average annual returns in the 20-50% range for select performers. These bots adapt to volatility, incorporating technical indicators, machine learning signals, and risk management. Investors can explore and deploy them for automated trading tailored to conditions like those affecting ARES and BAM. Visit the page to discover bots matching your portfolio needs.
Head-to-Head Comparison
ARES and BAM share an asset management focus but contrast in scope: ARES’s credit-heavy model offers higher yields but greater sensitivity to borrowing costs, while BAM’s diversified real assets provide inflation hedges via infrastructure growth drivers. Recent momentum favors BAM with steadier uptrends, versus ARES’s sharper swings. Risk factors include rate cuts pressuring ARES’s net interest income (NII, revenue from interest spreads) and real estate softness for BAM. Sector exposure tilts BAM toward renewables, boosting sentiment amid energy transitions, while ARES excels in private credit demand.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently leans toward BAM for its more consistent recent trends, lower relative YTD drawdown, and broader diversification amid uncertain rates. Observable catalysts like fee growth and scale position it favorably, though ARES could rebound with credit cycle support. This probabilistic edge reflects data-driven pattern recognition, not guarantees.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ARES is a Hold and BAM is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
ARES’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBAM’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- ARES’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
ARES’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BAM’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- ARES’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
- BAM’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
ARES (@Investment Managers) experienced а -6.05% price change this week, while BAM (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.87% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -2.28%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.46%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.13%.
Reported Earning Dates
ARES is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Investment Managers (-2.28% weekly)Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.
| ARES | BAM | ARES / BAM | |
| Capitalization | 27.2B | 75.1B | 36% |
| EBITDA | 2.23B | 3.46B | 64% |
| Gain YTD | -20.250 | -7.849 | 258% |
| P/E Ratio | 58.02 | 30.31 | 191% |
| Revenue | 5.91B | 4.77B | 124% |
| Total Cash | N/A | 1.1B | - |
| Total Debt | 14.1B | 3.83B | 369% |
ARES | BAM | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 38 | 10 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 14 Undervalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 96 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 96 | 32 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 88 | 74 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 33 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ARES's Valuation (14) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (15) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BAM (96) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew somewhat faster than BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's SMR Rating (32) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ARES (96) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than ARES’s over the last 12 months.
ARES's Price Growth Rating (52) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BAM (54) in the null industry. This means that ARES’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.
BAM's P/E Growth Rating (74) in the null industry is in the same range as ARES (88) in the Investment Managers industry. This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to ARES’s over the last 12 months.
| ARES | BAM | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 67% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 78% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 73% | 2 days ago 56% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 78% | 8 days ago 60% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 21 days ago 65% | 2 days ago 67% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 62% | 2 days ago 76% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 55% |
Advertisement
ARES and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ARES has been closely correlated with KKR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if ARES jumps, then KKR could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ARES | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ARES | 100% | -2.66% | ||
| KKR - ARES | 82% Closely correlated | -0.11% | ||
| OWL - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -3.15% | ||
| BX - ARES | 78% Closely correlated | -0.43% | ||
| TPG - ARES | 77% Closely correlated | -2.05% | ||
| APO - ARES | 76% Closely correlated | -1.67% | ||
More | ||||
BAM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.