BAM
Price
$53.00
Change
+$1.04 (+2.00%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
16.34B
SWKH
Price
$16.15
Change
-$0.15 (-0.92%)
Updated
Jan 14 closing price
Capitalization
217.7M
71 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs SWKH

Header iconBAM vs SWKH Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs SWKHBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$53.00
Change+$1.04 (+2.00%)
Volume$1.21M
Capitalization16.34B
SWK Holdings
Price$16.15
Change-$0.15 (-0.92%)
Volume$3.34K
Capitalization217.7M
BAM vs SWKH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. SWKH commentary
Jan 15, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongBuy and SWKH is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 15, 2025
Stock price -- (BAM: $53.00 vs. SWKH: $16.15)
Brand notoriety: BAM and SWKH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 124% vs. SWKH: 34%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. SWKH: $217.7M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. SWKH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $217.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSWKH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SWKH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than SWKH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SWKH’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • SWKH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the short-term than SWKH.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while SWKH (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -1.14%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.94%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.85%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

SWKH is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-1.14% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than SWKH($218M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than SWKH: BAM (37.12) vs SWKH (13.65). SWKH YTD gains are higher at: 1.828 vs. BAM (-2.196). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. SWKH (19.4M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 9M vs. SWKH (4.5M). SWKH has less debt than BAM: SWKH (43.1M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than SWKH: BAM (383M) vs SWKH (37.8M).
BAMSWKHBAM / SWKH
Capitalization16.3B218M7,477%
EBITDA522M19.4M2,691%
Gain YTD-2.1961.828-120%
P/E Ratio37.1213.65272%
Revenue383M37.8M1,013%
Total Cash9M4.5M200%
Total Debt256M43.1M594%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs SWKH: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
SWKH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7055
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
24
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5146
SMR RATING
1..100
5285
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4471
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2220
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
4150

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (24) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWKH (64). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

SWKH's Profit vs Risk Rating (46) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (51). This means that SWKH’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWKH (85). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as SWKH (71). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

SWKH's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as BAM (22). This means that SWKH’s stock grew similarly to BAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAMSWKH
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
54%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
53%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
50%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
89%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SWKH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GLEIX14.400.33
+2.35%
GS Energy Infrastructure Fd Inv Shares
BAUUX28.150.33
+1.19%
Brown Advisory Small-Cap Fdmtl Val Instl
HILGX11.500.11
+0.97%
Hennessy Cornerstone Large Growth Instl
HILCX17.330.14
+0.81%
Hartford International Value C
RISSX11.40N/A
N/A
RBC International Small Cap Equity A

SWKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWKH has been loosely correlated with APAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWKH jumps, then APAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWKH
1D Price
Change %
SWKH100%
-0.92%
APAM - SWKH
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.62%
CNS - SWKH
36%
Loosely correlated
+2.09%
DHIL - SWKH
34%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
AAMI - SWKH
33%
Poorly correlated
+1.62%
BX - SWKH
33%
Poorly correlated
+2.14%
More