Ad is loading...
BAM
Price
$55.56
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
SWKH
Price
$15.25
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 21 closing price
125 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BAM vs SWKH

Header iconBAM vs SWKH Comparison
Open Charts BAM vs SWKHBanner chart's image
Brookfield Asset Management
Price$55.56
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$699.08K
CapitalizationN/A
SWK Holdings
Price$15.25
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$29.03K
CapitalizationN/A
BAM vs SWKH Comparison Chart
Loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BAM vs. SWKH commentary
Nov 23, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BAM is a StrongSell and SWKH is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 23, 2024
Stock price -- (BAM: $55.56 vs. SWKH: $15.25)
Brand notoriety: BAM and SWKH are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BAM: 69% vs. SWKH: 315%
Market capitalization -- BAM: $16.34B vs. SWKH: $217.7M
BAM [@Investment Managers] is valued at $16.34B. SWKH’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $217.7M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $5.91B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BAM’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSWKH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BAM’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SWKH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BAM is a better buy in the long-term than SWKH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BAM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • BAM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

BAM (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.91% price change this week, while SWKH (@Investment Managers) price change was -6.21% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.86%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.84%.

Reported Earning Dates

BAM is expected to report earnings on Feb 08, 2023.

SWKH is expected to report earnings on Mar 27, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.86% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BAM($16.3B) has a higher market cap than SWKH($218M). BAM has higher P/E ratio than SWKH: BAM (37.12) vs SWKH (13.65). BAM YTD gains are higher at: 42.281 vs. SWKH (-13.006). BAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 522M vs. SWKH (19.4M). BAM has more cash in the bank: 9M vs. SWKH (4.5M). SWKH has less debt than BAM: SWKH (43.1M) vs BAM (256M). BAM has higher revenues than SWKH: BAM (383M) vs SWKH (37.8M).
BAMSWKHBAM / SWKH
Capitalization16.3B218M7,477%
EBITDA522M19.4M2,691%
Gain YTD42.281-13.006-325%
P/E Ratio37.1213.65272%
Revenue383M37.8M1,013%
Total Cash9M4.5M200%
Total Debt256M43.1M594%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BAM vs SWKH: Fundamental Ratings
BAM
SWKH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8367
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
22
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
4765
SMR RATING
1..100
5284
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3876
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2831
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BAM's Valuation (22) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWKH (64). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Profit vs Risk Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as SWKH (65). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's SMR Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as SWKH (84). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SWKH (76). This means that BAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

BAM's P/E Growth Rating (28) in the null industry is in the same range as SWKH (31). This means that BAM’s stock grew similarly to SWKH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BAM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
80%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BAM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if shorted
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
IDPSX59.371.07
+1.84%
ProFunds Industrial Ultra Sector Svc
RYCCX410.582.95
+0.72%
Rydex NASDAQ-100® 2x Strategy C
JDVSX16.210.06
+0.37%
JPMorgan Diversified I
MSLLX16.550.04
+0.24%
Morgan Stanley Inst Passport ovrs eq L
DEMZX21.05-0.24
-1.13%
Delaware Emerging Markets R6

BAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BAM has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 80% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BAM jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BAM
1D Price
Change %
BAM100%
+1.02%
BN - BAM
80%
Closely correlated
+2.04%
BX - BAM
71%
Closely correlated
+4.85%
TROW - BAM
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
APAM - BAM
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
CG - BAM
61%
Loosely correlated
+3.05%
More

SWKH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SWKH has been loosely correlated with CNS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SWKH jumps, then CNS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SWKH
1D Price
Change %
SWKH100%
+0.59%
CNS - SWKH
39%
Loosely correlated
+2.35%
APAM - SWKH
36%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
IVZ - SWKH
35%
Loosely correlated
+1.55%
BAM - SWKH
34%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
BN - SWKH
34%
Loosely correlated
+2.04%
More