BANF
Price
$108.05
Change
+$1.56 (+1.46%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.6B
13 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
SFST
Price
$60.72
Change
+$0.84 (+1.40%)
Updated
Oct 2, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
567.64M
25 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BANF vs SFST

BANF vs SFST Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BANF vs. SFST commentary
Oct 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BANF is a StrongBuy and SFST is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BANF vs SFST: Fundamental Ratings
BANF
SFST
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7359
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
81
Overvalued
82
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
3684
SMR RATING
1..100
1639
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6947
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6566
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BANF's Valuation (81) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (82). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's Profit vs Risk Rating (36) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SFST (84). This means that BANF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SFST’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's SMR Rating (16) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (39). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

SFST's Price Growth Rating (47) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BANF (69). This means that SFST’s stock grew similarly to BANF’s over the last 12 months.

BANF's P/E Growth Rating (65) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as SFST (66). This means that BANF’s stock grew similarly to SFST’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BANFSFST
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
81%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 03, 2026
Stock price -- (BANF: $106.49 vs. SFST: $59.88)
Brand notoriety: BANF and SFST are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BANF: 139% vs. SFST: 58%
Market capitalization -- BANF: $3.6B vs. SFST: $567.64M
BANF [@Regional Banks] is valued at $3.6B. SFST’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $567.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BANF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while SFST’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BANF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SFST’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both BANF and SFST are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BANF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SFST’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BANF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • SFST’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BANF is a better buy in the short-term than SFST.

Price Growth

BANF (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.31% price change this week, while SFST (@Regional Banks) price change was -0.47% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.68%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.78%.

Reported Earning Dates

BANF is expected to report earnings on Oct 15, 2026.

SFST is expected to report earnings on Oct 27, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.68% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BANF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
SFST
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
HFBL25.681.55
+6.42%
Home Federal Bancorp
TXT77.170.97
+1.27%
Textron
PAGS8.87-0.03
-0.34%
PagSeguro Digital Ltd
KRSP10.63-0.04
-0.37%
Rice Acquisition Corporation 3
TNON4.04-0.05
-1.22%
Tenon Medical Inc

BANF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BANF has been closely correlated with BUSE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 82% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BANF jumps, then BUSE could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BANF
1D Price
Change %
BANF100%
+1.15%
BUSE - BANF
82%
Closely correlated
+1.13%
PRK - BANF
82%
Closely correlated
+0.28%
UBSI - BANF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.00%
UCB - BANF
81%
Closely correlated
+1.26%
EFSC - BANF
81%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
More

SFST and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SFST has been closely correlated with THFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if SFST jumps, then THFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SFST
1D Price
Change %
SFST100%
+1.05%
THFF - SFST
77%
Closely correlated
+0.89%
STBA - SFST
76%
Closely correlated
+1.32%
GSBC - SFST
76%
Closely correlated
+1.17%
BANF - SFST
75%
Closely correlated
+1.15%
UVSP - SFST
75%
Closely correlated
+0.59%
More