BBCP
Price
$10.43
Change
+$0.25 (+2.46%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
525.6M
123 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BWMN
Price
$42.42
Change
-$0.09 (-0.21%)
Updated
Sep 11 closing price
Capitalization
735.3M
60 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBCP vs BWMN

BBCP vs BWMN Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBCP vs. BWMN commentary
Sep 12, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBCP is a Hold and BWMN is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BWMN($735M) has a higher market cap than BBCP($526M). BWMN has higher P/E ratio than BBCP: BWMN (101.00) vs BBCP (65.19). BBCP YTD gains are higher at: 55.440 vs. BWMN (28.468). BBCP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 102M vs. BWMN (46.6M). BBCP has more cash in the bank: 43M vs. BWMN (10.5M). BWMN has less debt than BBCP: BWMN (285M) vs BBCP (442M). BWMN has higher revenues than BBCP: BWMN (528M) vs BBCP (423M).
BBCPBWMNBBCP / BWMN
Capitalization526M735M72%
EBITDA102M46.6M219%
Gain YTD55.44028.468195%
P/E Ratio65.19101.0065%
Revenue423M528M80%
Total Cash43M10.5M410%
Total Debt442M285M155%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBCP: Fundamental Ratings
BBCP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
82
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
91
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
61
SMR RATING
1..100
86
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
40
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
14
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBCPBWMN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
65%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
78%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
83%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 12, 2026
Stock price -- (BBCP: $10.43 vs. BWMN: $42.42)
Brand notoriety: BBCP and BWMN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Engineering & Construction industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBCP: 75% vs. BWMN: 73%
Market capitalization -- BBCP: $525.6M vs. BWMN: $735.3M
BBCP [@Engineering & Construction] is valued at $525.6M. BWMN’s [@Engineering & Construction] market capitalization is $735.3M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Engineering & Construction] industry ranges from $15.66K to $14.67T. The average market capitalization across the [@Engineering & Construction] industry is $7.78B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBCP’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while BWMN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BBCP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BWMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BWMN is a better buy in the long-term than BBCP.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBCP’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BWMN’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBCP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • BWMN’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BWMN is a better buy in the short-term than BBCP.

Price Growth

BBCP (@Engineering & Construction) experienced а -0.67% price change this week, while BWMN (@Engineering & Construction) price change was -0.02% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Engineering & Construction industry was -3.36%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -12.22%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.40%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBCP is expected to report earnings on Jan 13, 2027.

BWMN is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Engineering & Construction (-3.36% weekly)

Engineering & Construction includes companies that engage in non-residential construction and contract services, including ventilation, heating and air conditioning (HVAC) services. The level/value of construction & engineering activity is one of the potentially relevant indicators of the health of businesses, and hence of the overall economy. Some of the large-cap U.S. companies in this industry include Jacobs Engineering Group Inc,, AECOM and Quanta Services, Inc.

View a ticker or compare two or three
BBCP
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BWMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AULGX105.900.89
+0.85%
American Century Ultra® R5
CSUZX25.75N/A
N/A
Cohen & Steers Global Infrastructure Z
SVXFX100.62N/A
N/A
Smead International Value I1
OARDX28.46N/A
N/A
Invesco Rising Dividends A
RWINX12.28N/A
N/A
Redwood AlphaFactor Tactical Intl N

BBCP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBCP has been loosely correlated with GVA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBCP jumps, then GVA could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBCP
1D Price
Change %
BBCP100%
+2.46%
GVA - BBCP
34%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
BWMN - BBCP
33%
Poorly correlated
-0.21%
PRIM - BBCP
31%
Poorly correlated
+3.17%
IESC - BBCP
29%
Poorly correlated
+8.20%
ROAD - BBCP
28%
Poorly correlated
+3.69%
More

BWMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BWMN has been loosely correlated with ORN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BWMN jumps, then ORN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BWMN
1D Price
Change %
BWMN100%
-0.21%
ORN - BWMN
48%
Loosely correlated
+3.31%
GVA - BWMN
45%
Loosely correlated
+3.18%
APG - BWMN
40%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
ACM - BWMN
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
PRIM - BWMN
38%
Loosely correlated
+3.17%
More