BBT
Price
$29.66
Change
+$0.29 (+0.99%)
Updated
Jun 10, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.49B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
FCF
Price
$19.53
Change
+$0.18 (+0.93%)
Updated
Jun 10 closing price
Capitalization
1.99B
47 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BBT vs FCF

Header iconBBT vs FCF Comparison
Open Charts BBT vs FCFBanner chart's image
BBT vs FCF Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BBT vs. FCF commentary
Jun 11, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBT is a Buy and FCF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 11, 2026
Stock price -- (BBT: $29.67 vs. FCF: $19.53)
Brand notoriety: BBT and FCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BBT: 74% vs. FCF: 105%
Market capitalization -- BBT: $2.49B vs. FCF: $1.99B
BBT [@Regional Banks] is valued at $2.49B. FCF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $1.99B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.94B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BBT’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFCF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BBT’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • FCF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FCF is a better buy in the long-term than BBT.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BBT’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FCF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BBT’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • FCF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BBT is a better buy in the short-term than FCF.

Price Growth

BBT (@Regional Banks) experienced а +5.03% price change this week, while FCF (@Regional Banks) price change was +4.83% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +4.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.48%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.24%.

Reported Earning Dates

BBT is expected to report earnings on Jul 22, 2026.

FCF is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+4.63% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BBT($2.49B) has a higher market cap than FCF($1.99B). BBT has higher P/E ratio than FCF: BBT (27.47) vs FCF (12.85). FCF YTD gains are higher at: 17.555 vs. BBT (15.023). BBT has more cash in the bank: 202M vs. FCF (103M). FCF has less debt than BBT: FCF (155M) vs BBT (1.17B). BBT has higher revenues than FCF: BBT (676M) vs FCF (538M).
BBTFCFBBT / FCF
Capitalization2.49B1.99B125%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD15.02317.55586%
P/E Ratio27.4712.85214%
Revenue676M538M126%
Total Cash202M103M196%
Total Debt1.17B155M752%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BBT vs FCF: Fundamental Ratings
BBT
FCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2836
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
42
Fair valued
42
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10035
SMR RATING
1..100
10042
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5844
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
943
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BBT's Valuation (42) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as FCF (42) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBT’s stock grew similarly to FCF’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (35) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBT (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBT’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's SMR Rating (42) in the Regional Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBT (100) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBT’s over the last 12 months.

FCF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as BBT (58) in the Major Banks industry. This means that FCF’s stock grew similarly to BBT’s over the last 12 months.

BBT's P/E Growth Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FCF (43) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that BBT’s stock grew somewhat faster than FCF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BBTFCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
54%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
58%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend about 1 month ago
66%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
54%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BBT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
FCF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNGD40.672.91
+7.71%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ -3X Invrs Lvrgd ETN
HERZ16.930.11
+0.68%
Herzfeld Credit Income Fund Inc.
OBIL50.06N/A
N/A
F/m US Treasury 12 Month Bill ETF
QBF15.63-0.04
-0.24%
Innovator Uncapped Bitcoin 20 Flr ETF-Qt
ARKB20.52-0.06
-0.29%
ARK 21Shares Bitcoin ETF

BBT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBT has been loosely correlated with CZNC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBT jumps, then CZNC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BBT
1D Price
Change %
BBT100%
+1.02%
CZNC - BBT
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.34%
ALRS - BBT
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.30%
EGBN - BBT
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.05%
BRBS - BBT
59%
Loosely correlated
N/A
PLBC - BBT
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.67%
More