This stock comparison between BBWI (Bath & Body Works, Inc.) and PAG (Penske Automotive Group, Inc.) evaluates their relative performance, business models, and market positioning in the current environment. Both operate in cyclical sectors—consumer discretionary retail for BBWI and automotive retail for PAG—making them relevant for traders monitoring economic shifts, consumer spending, and sector rotations. Investors seeking value, income, or momentum may find insights here on contrasts in valuation, growth drivers, and risk profiles amid recent market activity.
BBWI, a leading specialty retailer of personal care and home fragrance products, operates thousands of stores and e-commerce platforms primarily in North America. In recent market activity, the stock has traded around $19.73, within a 52-week range of $14.28 to $34.66, reflecting volatility tied to consumer spending trends. Year-to-date returns stand at +0.92%, underperforming the S&P 500's +8.08%. Influences include a forecasted steeper annual sales decline due to turnaround efforts, store closures exceeding 90 locations to optimize footprint, and new initiatives like digital expansions and brand partnerships (e.g., Star Wars collections). Despite challenges, BBWI maintains a low P/E ratio of about 6.3, an 8.9% profit margin, and a 4% dividend yield, with recent executive appointments signaling strategic focus. Sentiment reflects caution on discretionary demand but optimism for cost efficiencies.
PAG, a diversified automotive retailer, manages dealerships for luxury and commercial brands across multiple countries, including segments in retail automotive, trucks, and investments. The stock recently closed near $173.81, in a 52-week range of $140.12 to $189.51. Year-to-date, it has gained +10.76%, outperforming the S&P 500, driven by resilient aftermarket services. Key developments include Q1 2026 results with $7.86 billion in revenue (up 3.4% YoY), record service and parts revenue up 5% same-store, and acquisitions like Lexus dealerships adding $450 million in annualized revenue. Gross profit per unit rose sequentially, with a P/E of 12.6, 2.9% net margin, and 3.2% dividend yield boosted by a recent increase. Positive trucking trends and share repurchases have supported sentiment, though new vehicle sales face headwinds.
Tickeron's Trending AI Robots page features a curated selection of top-performing AI trading bots from its library of hundreds, which trade thousands of tickers across diverse strategies, timeframes, and market conditions. These bots, powered by AI/ML and fundamental analysis, deliver real-time signals for stocks, ETFs, and crypto, with standout performers showing annualized returns up to +285%, win rates of 50-88%, profit factors of 1.5-7+, and profit-to-drawdown ratios exceeding 10. Examples include semiconductor-focused agents with +95% returns and industrials bots at +88%, using short timeframes like 5-60 minutes or daily corridors (e.g., 3% TP/2% SL). Virtual and brokerage agents incorporate risk management for varied volatility levels. Traders can explore these high-conviction options tailored to current trends—visit the page to select bots aligning with your portfolio.
BBWI and PAG differ starkly in business models: BBWI's direct-to-consumer fragrance retail contrasts PAG's franchise dealerships emphasizing services (growing 5-6% same-store). Growth drivers for BBWI include e-commerce and product innovation amid sales pressure (-1.6% FY), while PAG leverages acquisitions ($2B+ annualized revenue potential) and truck recovery. Recent momentum favors PAG (YTD +10.76% vs. flat), with lower beta (0.89 vs. 1.39) reducing risk. BBWI offers cheaper valuation (P/E 6.3 vs. 12.6) but higher sector cyclicality; PAG provides stability via recurring service revenue. Sentiment tilts positive for PAG's execution, while BBWI weighs turnaround trade-offs.
Tickeron's AI currently favors PAG due to superior trend consistency, YTD outperformance, acquisition catalysts, and defensive service revenue positioning amid economic uncertainty. BBWI's value appeal exists, but softer sales outlook tempers probability. Observable factors like lower volatility and profit growth suggest higher relative positioning for PAG in prevailing conditions.
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full Disclaimers and Limitations.
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBWI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBWI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
BBWI (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.71% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was +5.06% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.97%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was +1.78%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.53%, and the average quarterly price growth was -2.37%.
BBWI is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (+1.78% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| BBWI | PAG | BBWI / PAG | |
| Capitalization | 3.97B | 11.4B | 35% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | 1.68B | 84% |
| Gain YTD | -0.922 | 10.413 | -9% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.34 | 12.53 | 51% |
| Revenue | 7.29B | 31.7B | 23% |
| Total Cash | 953M | 83.7M | 1,139% |
| Total Debt | 4.95B | 9.21B | 54% |
BBWI | PAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 37 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 21 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 52 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 46 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 39 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBWI's Valuation (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as PAG (37) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (21) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBWI (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than BBWI’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's SMR Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for PAG (52) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than PAG’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BBWI (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to BBWI’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Specialty Stores industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BBWI (81) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BBWI’s over the last 12 months.
| BBWI | PAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 67% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | N/A |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 59% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 56% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 58% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| ACSG | 46.49 | 0.25 | +0.53% |
| American Century Small Cp Gr Insgts ETF | |||
| ISWN | 22.26 | 0.08 | +0.36% |
| Amplify BlackSwan ISWN ETF | |||
| ESPO | 90.29 | -0.15 | -0.17% |
| VanEck Vdo Gaming and eSprts ETF | |||
| HOLA | 54.20 | -0.10 | -0.19% |
| JPMorgan Intl Hdg Eq Ldrd Overlay ETF | |||
| PCY | 21.58 | -0.09 | -0.42% |
| Invesco Emerging Markets Sov Debt ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBWI has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBWI jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBWI | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| AN - BBWI | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CPRT - BBWI | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| FND - BBWI | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| RH - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| PAG - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||