Advertisement
BBWI vs RH
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Bath & Body Works (BBWI) vs. RH (RH) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BBWI trades at a low trailing P/E ratio of approximately 6.3, significantly below the consumer cyclical sector average, with a 4.05% dividend yield providing income stability.
- RH exhibits higher volatility with a beta over 1.8 and trades at a P/E of 21.2, reflecting premium positioning in luxury home furnishings amid housing market pressures.
- Recent quarterly earnings for BBWI beat estimates with EPS of $2.05 versus $1.77 expected, while RH missed with $1.53 against $2.21 consensus.
- Both stocks have declined over the past year—BBWI down about 41%, RH down around 41%—but BBWI shows stronger international sales growth.
- BBWI's market cap stands at $3.97 billion versus RH's $2.53 billion, with BBWI offering broader retail exposure.
- Tickeron's AI analysis favors BBWI for its relative valuation and stability in recent market activity.
Introduction
This stock comparison examines BBWI (Bath & Body Works), a leading specialty retailer of personal care and home fragrance products, against RH (Restoration Hardware), a luxury home furnishings provider. Both operate in the consumer cyclical sector, sensitive to discretionary spending trends, making them relevant for value-oriented investors and short-term traders navigating retail volatility. Recent market activity highlights contrasts in earnings delivery, valuation multiples, and growth drivers, offering insights into relative performance and positioning amid shifting consumer sentiment.
BBWI Overview and Recent Performance
Bath & Body Works (BBWI) specializes in body care, soaps, and home fragrance items sold through stores, e-commerce, and international franchises. In recent quarters, the company reported Q4 fiscal 2025 net sales of $2.72 billion, down 2.3% year-over-year but beating estimates by 4.23%, with adjusted EPS of $2.05 surpassing consensus by 15.72%. International net sales grew 8.6%, signaling global momentum despite U.S. softness from macroeconomic pressures and tariffs. The stock, trading around $19.73 with a $3.97 billion market cap, has shown resilience in recent weeks, up over 6% in five days amid broader retail declines. Sentiment benefits from a forward P/E of 7.5, 4.05% dividend yield, and Zacks Rank #3 (Hold), though fiscal 2026 guidance projects sales down 2.5-4.5% due to investments in innovation.
RH Overview and Recent Performance
Restoration Hardware (RH), known for high-end furniture and decor, operates galleries, outlets, and water vessels for experiential retail. Q4 fiscal 2026 revenues reached $842.6 million, up 3.7% but missing estimates by 3.5%, with EPS of $1.53 falling short of $2.21 consensus by 31%. Weak housing market dynamics and consumer caution in luxury spending weighed on demand. Shares hover near $134 with a $2.53 billion market cap, experiencing volatility with recent monthly gains of about 11% offset by YTD declines over 25%. High short interest at 35.62% reflects bearish sentiment, compounded by a Zacks Rank #5 (Strong Sell) and analyst concerns over sales slowdowns, though strategic investments aim for long-term recovery.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page showcases a curated selection of 25 top-performing AI trading bots out of 351 total bots, chosen by AI analysis for their suitability to current market conditions like volatility in growth sectors. These bots employ diverse strategies—trend trading, multi-agent systems, and corridor take-profit/stop-loss exits (e.g., TP 3%/SL 2%)—across timeframes from 5 minutes to 60 minutes, trading stocks, ETFs, and crypto with 1 to 18 tickers per bot. Performance stats shine: annualized returns up to +285% (e.g., Space Infrastructure bot at +285.35%), win rates of 50-88% (many 70-80%), and profit factors from 1.5 to 11.7. Sectors include semiconductors, industrials, space, and AI infrastructure. Traders can explore signal, virtual, or brokerage agents for copy trading. Visit Trending AI Robots to discover bots aligned with today’s opportunities.
Head-to-Head Comparison
BBWI and RH both face consumer cyclical headwinds but differ sharply in business models: BBWI’s mass-market personal care drives recurring volume via affordable essentials, while RH targets aspirational big-ticket home goods sensitive to housing and rates. Valuation favors BBWI at 6.3x trailing P/E versus RH’s 21.2x, with BBWI’s dividend adding appeal. Growth drivers contrast: BBWI leverages international expansion (8.6% growth), RH bets on experiential retail amid slowdowns. Recent momentum shows BBWI stabilizing post-earnings beat, RH volatile after miss. Risks include BBWI’s U.S. same-store sales pressure and RH’s high debt (debt-to-equity over 5,000%) and short interest. Sector exposure ties both to retail, but BBWI offers defensive traits, RH cyclical upside.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Tickeron’s AI currently favors BBWI over RH, based on superior trend consistency in recent market activity, lower valuation multiples, earnings beat reliability, and income from dividends. BBWI’s international catalysts and stability provide probabilistic edge amid retail uncertainty, though RH could rebound with housing recovery.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer. Disclaimers and Limitations
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBWI is a StrongBuy and RH is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBWI’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileRH’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- BBWI’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
- RH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBWI’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RH’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBWI’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- RH’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
BBWI (@Specialty Stores) experienced а +2.71% price change this week, while RH (@Specialty Stores) price change was +3.02% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was +1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.71%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.97%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBWI is expected to report earnings on May 14, 2026.
RH is expected to report earnings on Jun 11, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (+1.60% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
| BBWI | RH | BBWI / RH | |
| Capitalization | 3.97B | 2.53B | 157% |
| EBITDA | 1.41B | 544M | 260% |
| Gain YTD | -0.922 | -25.264 | 4% |
| P/E Ratio | 6.34 | 21.22 | 30% |
| Revenue | 7.29B | 3.44B | 212% |
| Total Cash | 953M | 41.2M | 2,313% |
| Total Debt | 4.95B | 3.97B | 125% |
BBWI | RH | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 12 Undervalued | 77 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 1 | 33 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 61 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBWI's Valuation (12) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RH (77) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew somewhat faster than RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RH (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's SMR Rating (1) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RH (33) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RH (63) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
BBWI's P/E Growth Rating (81) in the Apparel Or Footwear Retail industry is in the same range as RH (97) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBWI’s stock grew similarly to RH’s over the last 12 months.
| BBWI | RH | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 6 days ago 74% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 78% | 4 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 77% | 4 days ago 66% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 76% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 73% | 4 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 72% | 4 days ago 77% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 81% | 8 days ago 75% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 75% | 4 days ago 70% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 4 days ago 64% | 4 days ago 74% |
Advertisement
BBWI and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBWI has been loosely correlated with AN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 56% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBWI jumps, then AN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BBWI | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BBWI | 100% | +2.23% | ||
| AN - BBWI | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.33% | ||
| CPRT - BBWI | 55% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| FND - BBWI | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.41% | ||
| RH - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | +0.18% | ||
| PAG - BBWI | 52% Loosely correlated | +1.28% | ||
More | ||||
RH and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RH has been loosely correlated with FND. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RH jumps, then FND could also see price increases.