Advertisement
BBY vs PAG
Which Stock Would AI Choose? Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) vs. Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) Stock Comparison
Key Takeaways
- BBY operates in consumer electronics retail with exposure to discretionary spending, while PAG focuses on automotive retail and services across new, used, and commercial vehicles.
- Recent market activity shows BBY trading near its 52-week lows amid earnings anticipation, whereas PAG reported a first-quarter earnings beat and raised its quarterly dividend.
- BBY has delivered modest year-to-date gains but trails the broader market, while PAG has faced year-to-date pressure yet maintains a moderate buy analyst consensus.
- Sector dynamics differ: BBY contends with technology product demand fluctuations, and PAG benefits from recurring service and parts revenue alongside vehicle sales.
- Risk factors include macroeconomic sensitivity for both, with BBY more tied to consumer confidence and PAG influenced by vehicle supply, interest rates, and commercial fleet activity.
- Market sentiment reflects positioning ahead of BBY’s upcoming results versus PAG’s demonstrated operational resilience in recent quarters.
Introduction
This comparison examines BBY and PAG to highlight differences in business models, recent performance trends, and market positioning. The analysis draws on observable financial metrics and sector developments from the past several weeks to provide context for traders and investors evaluating relative opportunities in consumer cyclicals. Professional and retail participants seeking data-driven insights on stock volatility, earnings momentum, and sector exposure may find the side-by-side review useful for portfolio construction or tactical allocation decisions.
BBY Overview and Recent Performance
Best Buy Co., Inc. (BBY) is a leading specialty retailer of technology products, consumer electronics, and related services, operating primarily in North America with a network of physical stores and an expanding online presence. In recent market activity, the stock has traded near the lower end of its 52-week range amid broader caution in discretionary retail. Performance has reflected investor focus on upcoming quarterly results, with modest year-to-date gains that have lagged the S&P 500. Sentiment has been influenced by analyst commentary on comparable sales expectations and initiatives in marketplace and advertising revenue, alongside periodic price target adjustments. The company continues to emphasize omnichannel capabilities and membership programs to support customer engagement in a competitive environment.
PAG Overview and Recent Performance
Penske Automotive Group, Inc. (PAG) is a diversified automotive retailer offering new and used vehicles, parts, service, and commercial truck operations across multiple markets. Recent market activity has featured the release of first-quarter results that exceeded revenue and earnings estimates, supported by growth in service and parts revenue as well as acquisitions. The company also announced an increase in its quarterly dividend. Stock performance has shown resilience relative to some peers despite year-to-date declines, with analysts maintaining a moderate buy consensus. Sentiment has been shaped by same-store sales trends, foreign currency impacts, and management’s focus on operational efficiency amid varying vehicle demand conditions.
Trending AI Robots
Tickeron’s Trending AI Robots page curates a selection of high-performing automated trading systems from a broader library of hundreds of AI trading bots that cover thousands of different tickers. Only those demonstrating strong suitability for prevailing market conditions, consistent backtested or live statistics, and alignment with current volatility and trend environments earn placement in the trending section. Available bots span diverse trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performance metrics, and ticker sets, allowing users to review ranges of returns, win rates, and drawdown profiles. This resource provides transparent data for evaluating algorithmic approaches without guaranteeing future outcomes. Explore the full selection at Trending AI Robots.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Business models present clear contrasts: BBY centers on high-volume technology and appliance sales with service add-ons, while PAG generates substantial recurring revenue from automotive service and parts alongside vehicle retailing. Growth drivers differ accordingly, with BBY tied to consumer electronics cycles and digital transformation initiatives, and PAG benefiting from fleet services and dealership network expansion. Recent momentum favors PAG following its earnings beat, whereas BBY shows positioning volatility ahead of its report. Risk factors include interest-rate sensitivity for vehicle financing at PAG versus broader retail spending patterns at BBY. Sector exposure places both in consumer cyclicals, yet PAG offers partial insulation through commercial operations. Overall market sentiment reflects measured optimism around PAG’s operational metrics compared with caution around BBY’s near-term visibility.
Tickeron AI Verdict
Based on observable factors including earnings delivery consistency, dividend action, and relative positioning within recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI models would currently assign a modestly higher probability of favorable near-term characteristics to PAG. Trend stability appears supported by service revenue growth and acquisition activity, while BBY faces greater uncertainty pending its quarterly update. This assessment remains probabilistic and does not constitute investment advice.
Disclaimer
The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BBY is a Hold and PAG is a Buy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BBY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whilePAG’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BBY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
- PAG’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BBY’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAG’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BBY’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- PAG’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BBY (@Specialty Stores) experienced а -0.50% price change this week, while PAG (@Automotive Aftermarket) price change was -2.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Specialty Stores industry was -1.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.40%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Automotive Aftermarket industry was -2.10%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.05%, and the average quarterly price growth was -21.34%.
Reported Earning Dates
BBY is expected to report earnings on Sep 01, 2026.
PAG is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Specialty Stores (-1.60% weekly)The specialty stores sector includes companies dedicated to the sale of retail products focused on a single product category, such as clothing, carpet, books, or office supplies. A specialty store could face intense competition from big-box departmental chains, and therefore offering an adequate collection of the product type it specializes in is key in maintaining/growing its market.
@Automotive Aftermarket (-2.10% weekly)The Automotive Aftermarket consists of the manufacturing, remanufacturing, distribution, retailing, and installation of vehicle parts and accessories, after the sale of the automobile by the original equipment manufacturer (OEM) to the consumer. The aftermarket parts many not be manufactured by the OEM. According to a Technavio study, the US automotive parts aftermarket size is estimated to grow by USD 24.33 billion during 2018-2022 (CAGR 3%). Like many other industries, the automotive aftermarket is also being intensely penetrated by the digital boom. The online auto parts sales market is predicted to exceed $13B by 2020 (according to a study by Mirakl).
| BBY | PAG | BBY / PAG | |
| Capitalization | 15.8B | 11.6B | 136% |
| EBITDA | 2.42B | 1.68B | 144% |
| Gain YTD | 16.830 | 12.491 | 135% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.08 | 12.65 | 111% |
| Revenue | 41.9B | 31.7B | 132% |
| Total Cash | 1.35B | 83.7M | 1,615% |
| Total Debt | 4.13B | 9.21B | 45% |
BBY | PAG | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 36 | 76 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 10 Undervalued | 31 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 20 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 25 | 53 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 15 | 45 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 65 | 49 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BBY's Valuation (10) in the Electronics Or Appliance Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (31) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's Profit vs Risk Rating (20) in the Specialty Stores industry is significantly better than the same rating for BBY (100) in the Electronics Or Appliance Stores industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew significantly faster than BBY’s over the last 12 months.
BBY's SMR Rating (25) in the Electronics Or Appliance Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (53) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
BBY's Price Growth Rating (15) in the Electronics Or Appliance Stores industry is in the same range as PAG (45) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BBY’s stock grew similarly to PAG’s over the last 12 months.
PAG's P/E Growth Rating (49) in the Specialty Stores industry is in the same range as BBY (65) in the Electronics Or Appliance Stores industry. This means that PAG’s stock grew similarly to BBY’s over the last 12 months.
| BBY | PAG | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 78% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 6 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 71% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 67% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 72% | 2 days ago 56% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 69% | 9 days ago 58% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 2 days ago 61% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 59% | 2 days ago 58% |
Advertisement
BBY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BBY has been loosely correlated with CPRT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BBY jumps, then CPRT could also see price increases.
PAG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAG has been closely correlated with ABG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAG jumps, then ABG could also see price increases.