BC
Price
$47.93
Change
-$7.63 (-13.73%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
6.51B
20 days until earnings call
HAS
Price
$54.99
Change
-$7.70 (-12.28%)
Updated
Apr 3 closing price
Capitalization
7.84B
19 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BC vs HAS

Header iconBC vs HAS Comparison
Open Charts BC vs HASBanner chart's image
Brunswick
Price$47.93
Change-$7.63 (-13.73%)
Volume$1.82M
Capitalization6.51B
Hasbro
Price$54.99
Change-$7.70 (-12.28%)
Volume$4.11M
Capitalization7.84B
BC vs HAS Comparison Chart
Loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BC vs. HAS commentary
Apr 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BC is a StrongBuy and HAS is a Buy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BC: $47.93 vs. HAS: $54.98)
Brand notoriety: BC and HAS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BC: 206% vs. HAS: 226%
Market capitalization -- BC: $6.51B vs. HAS: $7.84B
BC [@Recreational Products] is valued at $6.51B. HAS’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $7.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.21B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BC’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileHAS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BC’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • HAS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, HAS is a better buy in the long-term than BC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BC’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HAS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • HAS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BC is a better buy in the short-term than HAS.

Price Growth

BC (@Recreational Products) experienced а -14.40% price change this week, while HAS (@Recreational Products) price change was -10.43% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was -6.39%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -5.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was -13.48%.

Reported Earning Dates

BC is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

HAS is expected to report earnings on Apr 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Recreational Products (-6.39% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HAS($7.84B) has a higher market cap than BC($6.51B). HAS has higher P/E ratio than BC: HAS (75.76) vs BC (15.64). HAS YTD gains are higher at: -0.577 vs. BC (-25.385). BC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.01B vs. HAS (-863.2M). HAS has more cash in the bank: 545M vs. BC (469M). BC has less debt than HAS: BC (2.59B) vs HAS (3.5B). BC has higher revenues than HAS: BC (6.4B) vs HAS (5B).
BCHASBC / HAS
Capitalization6.51B7.84B83%
EBITDA1.01B-863.2M-117%
Gain YTD-25.385-0.5774,403%
P/E Ratio15.6475.7621%
Revenue6.4B5B128%
Total Cash469M545M86%
Total Debt2.59B3.5B74%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BC vs HAS: Fundamental Ratings
BC
HAS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
916
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
23
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
84100
SMR RATING
1..100
8028
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8249
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HAS's Valuation (17) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as BC (23). This means that HAS’s stock grew similarly to BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's Profit vs Risk Rating (84) in the Recreational Products industry is in the same range as HAS (100). This means that BC’s stock grew similarly to HAS’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's SMR Rating (28) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BC (80). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BC’s over the last 12 months.

HAS's Price Growth Rating (49) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BC (82). This means that HAS’s stock grew somewhat faster than BC’s over the last 12 months.

BC's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Recreational Products industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HAS (69). This means that BC’s stock grew somewhat faster than HAS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHAS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
57%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
47%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
55%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
69%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
HAS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BNY10.300.10
+0.98%
BlackRock New York Municipal Income Trust
BLV70.870.21
+0.30%
Vanguard Long-Term Bond ETF
THQ20.13-0.26
-1.28%
abrdn Healthcare Opportunities Fund
MFEM18.69-0.35
-1.82%
PIMCO RAFI Dyn Mlt-Fctr Emrg Mkts Eq ETF
GK18.70-1.17
-5.91%
AdvisorShares Gerber Kawasaki ETF

BC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BC has been closely correlated with LCII. These tickers have moved in lockstep 77% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BC jumps, then LCII could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BC
1D Price
Change %
BC100%
-13.73%
LCII - BC
77%
Closely correlated
-9.81%
WGO - BC
75%
Closely correlated
-8.26%
PII - BC
74%
Closely correlated
-15.18%
HOG - BC
73%
Closely correlated
-10.05%
MBUU - BC
72%
Closely correlated
-9.17%
More

HAS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HAS has been loosely correlated with MAT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 48% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HAS jumps, then MAT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HAS
1D Price
Change %
HAS100%
-12.28%
MAT - HAS
48%
Loosely correlated
-16.56%
JAKK - HAS
39%
Loosely correlated
-13.87%
LCII - HAS
38%
Loosely correlated
-9.81%
FNKO - HAS
34%
Loosely correlated
-18.01%
PII - HAS
33%
Loosely correlated
-15.18%
More