BCH
Price
$23.50
Change
+$0.28 (+1.21%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
11.23B
15 days until earnings call
NWG
Price
$10.21
Change
+$0.08 (+0.79%)
Updated
Jan 17 closing price
Capitalization
29.27B
27 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCH vs NWG

Header iconBCH vs NWG Comparison
Open Charts BCH vs NWGBanner chart's image
Banco de ChileAmerican
Price$23.50
Change+$0.28 (+1.21%)
Volume$266.98K
Capitalization11.23B
NatWest Group
Price$10.21
Change+$0.08 (+0.79%)
Volume$3.09M
Capitalization29.27B
BCH vs NWG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCH vs. NWG commentary
Jan 19, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCH is a Hold and NWG is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 19, 2025
Stock price -- (BCH: $23.50 vs. NWG: $10.21)
Brand notoriety: BCH and NWG are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCH: 110% vs. NWG: 144%
Market capitalization -- BCH: $11.23B vs. NWG: $29.27B
BCH [@Regional Banks] is valued at $11.23B. NWG’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $29.27B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileNWG’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BCH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • NWG’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than BCH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while NWG’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • NWG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BCH is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

BCH (@Regional Banks) experienced а +4.63% price change this week, while NWG (@Regional Banks) price change was +10.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +3.11%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.42%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCH is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

NWG is expected to report earnings on Apr 25, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+3.11% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NWG($29.3B) has a higher market cap than BCH($11.2B). BCH has higher P/E ratio than NWG: BCH (8.77) vs NWG (5.44). BCH YTD gains are higher at: 3.616 vs. NWG (0.393). BCH has higher revenues than NWG: BCH (2.94T) vs NWG (14.8B).
BCHNWGBCH / NWG
Capitalization11.2B29.3B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD3.6160.393919%
P/E Ratio8.775.44161%
Revenue2.94T14.8B19,845%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A60.1B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCH vs NWG: Fundamental Ratings
BCH
NWG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2323
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
92
Overvalued
31
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
2819
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6212
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (31) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (92) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (19) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (28) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

BCH's SMR Rating (1) in the Regional Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (5) in the Major Banks industry. This means that BCH’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCH (51) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to BCH’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (12) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BCH (62) in the Regional Banks industry. This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than BCH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCHNWG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
69%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
61%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
58%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
51%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 16 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
80%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
NWG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ENSC7.770.77
+11.00%
Ensysce Biosciences
RDCM14.07-0.02
-0.18%
Radcom Ltd
BNL15.75-0.12
-0.76%
Broadstone Net Lease
MGM32.85-0.28
-0.85%
MGM Resorts International
CBL28.14-0.46
-1.61%
CBL & Associates Properties

BCH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCH has been closely correlated with BSAC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCH jumps, then BSAC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCH
1D Price
Change %
BCH100%
+1.21%
BSAC - BCH
76%
Closely correlated
+0.05%
ITUB - BCH
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
BSBR - BCH
40%
Loosely correlated
-0.24%
UOVEY - BCH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.53%
NWG - BCH
37%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
+0.79%
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
+1.93%
LYG - NWG
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.71%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
+2.68%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
N/A
ING - NWG
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
More