NWG
Price
$17.52
Change
-$0.24 (-1.35%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
69.58B
17 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$51.92
Change
-$0.16 (-0.31%)
Updated
Jul 13, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
171.09B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWG vs UBS

NWG vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWG vs. UBS commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWG is a Hold and UBS is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (NWG: $17.50 vs. UBS: $52.08)
Brand notoriety: NWG and UBS are both not notable
NWG represents the Regional Banks, while UBS is part of the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWG: 74% vs. UBS: 61%
Market capitalization -- NWG: $69.58B vs. UBS: $171.09B
NWG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $69.58B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $171.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $142.82B to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $896.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.48B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $209.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileUBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBS is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

NWG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.74% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was +2.04% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.58%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.22%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -0.26%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.52%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Jul 31, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.58% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Major Banks (-0.26% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
UBS($171B) has a higher market cap than NWG($69.6B). UBS has higher P/E ratio than NWG: UBS (18.61) vs NWG (9.50). UBS YTD gains are higher at: 15.063 vs. NWG (4.295). NWG has less debt than UBS: NWG (6.64B) vs UBS (344B). UBS has higher revenues than NWG: UBS (49.1B) vs NWG (17B).
NWGUBSNWG / UBS
Capitalization69.6B171B41%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.29515.06329%
P/E Ratio9.5018.6151%
Revenue17B49.1B35%
Total CashN/A210B-
Total Debt6.64B344B2%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWG vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
NWG
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
71
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
1010
SMR RATING
1..100
78
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4341
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3974
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (71). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (10) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (10). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's SMR Rating (7) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (8). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

UBS's Price Growth Rating (41) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as NWG (43). This means that UBS’s stock grew similarly to NWG’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (39) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (74). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWGUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
47%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
62%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
46%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MOS22.310.80
+3.72%
Mosaic Company (The)
NFLX73.830.46
+0.63%
Netflix Inc.
BCYC4.35-0.06
-1.36%
Bicycle Therapeutics plc
WYFI36.29-2.21
-5.74%
WhiteFiber Inc
LITS0.95-0.06
-6.36%
Lite Strategy Inc.

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been closely correlated with ING. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then ING could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
-0.29%
ING - UBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.28%
BCS - UBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.69%
SAN - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
-1.51%
HSBC - UBS
57%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
BNS - UBS
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.47%
More