NWG
Price
$17.50
Change
-$0.17 (-0.96%)
Updated
Oct 5 closing price
Capitalization
72.39B
24 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UBS
Price
$48.18
Change
+$0.47 (+0.99%)
Updated
Oct 5 closing price
Capitalization
149.47B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

NWG vs UBS

NWG vs UBS Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
NWG vs. UBS commentary
Oct 06, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is NWG is a Buy and UBS is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
NWG vs UBS: Fundamental Ratings
NWG
UBS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8481
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
18
Undervalued
57
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
913
SMR RATING
1..100
55
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4654
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
3469
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

NWG's Valuation (18) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (57). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Profit vs Risk Rating (9) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (13). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's SMR Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (5). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as UBS (54). This means that NWG’s stock grew similarly to UBS’s over the last 12 months.

NWG's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for UBS (69). This means that NWG’s stock grew somewhat faster than UBS’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
NWGUBS
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
53%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
46%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
56%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
61%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
38%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
51%
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 06, 2026
Stock price -- (NWG: $17.50 vs. UBS: $48.18)
Brand notoriety: NWG and UBS are both not notable
NWG represents the Regional Banks, while UBS is part of the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: NWG: 176% vs. UBS: 85%
Market capitalization -- NWG: $72.39B vs. UBS: $149.47B
NWG [@Regional Banks] is valued at $72.39B. UBS’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $149.47B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $22.65 to $173.74B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $1.04M to $894.72B. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $6.12B. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $206.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

NWG’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green while UBS’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • NWG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • UBS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, NWG is a better buy in the long-term than UBS.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

NWG’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UBS’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • NWG’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • UBS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, UBS is a better buy in the short-term than NWG.

Price Growth

NWG (@Regional Banks) experienced а -4.58% price change this week, while UBS (@Major Banks) price change was -0.90% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was +0.20%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.84%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was -2.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.88%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.54%.

Reported Earning Dates

NWG is expected to report earnings on Oct 30, 2026.

UBS is expected to report earnings on Oct 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (+0.20% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

@Major Banks (-2.31% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

View a ticker or compare two or three
NWG
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UBS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interact to see
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CBOE277.476.21
+2.29%
Cboe Global Markets
ASBP8.880.09
+1.02%
Aspire-Lakewood Holdings Inc
NEN49.01N/A
N/A
New England Realty Associates Limited
IPAR113.76-0.19
-0.17%
Interparfums Inc
MAKO9.08-0.18
-1.94%
Mako Mining Corp

NWG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, NWG has been closely correlated with LYG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if NWG jumps, then LYG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To NWG
1D Price
Change %
NWG100%
-0.96%
LYG - NWG
86%
Closely correlated
-0.73%
DB - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
N/A
BCS - NWG
68%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
UBS - NWG
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.99%
BBVA - NWG
57%
Loosely correlated
-0.15%
More

UBS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UBS has been closely correlated with BCS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if UBS jumps, then BCS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UBS
1D Price
Change %
UBS100%
+0.99%
BCS - UBS
66%
Closely correlated
-0.51%
ING - UBS
66%
Loosely correlated
-0.03%
SAN - UBS
60%
Loosely correlated
+4.04%
HSBC - UBS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.56%
RY - UBS
54%
Loosely correlated
-0.51%
More