BCS
Price
$14.78
Change
-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Updated
Jan 31, 10:30 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
34.89B
13 days until earnings call
MUFG
Price
$12.69
Change
-$0.06 (-0.47%)
Updated
Jan 31, 11:28 AM (EDT)
Capitalization
116.09B
4 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BCS vs MUFG

Header iconBCS vs MUFG Comparison
Open Charts BCS vs MUFGBanner chart's image
Barclays
Price$14.78
Change-$0.02 (-0.14%)
Volume$3.2K
Capitalization34.89B
Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group
Price$12.69
Change-$0.06 (-0.47%)
Volume$12.21K
Capitalization116.09B
BCS vs MUFG Comparison Chart
Loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BCS vs. MUFG commentary
Jan 31, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BCS is a Buy and MUFG is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jan 31, 2025
Stock price -- (BCS: $14.80 vs. MUFG: $12.75)
Brand notoriety: BCS: Notable vs. MUFG: Not notable
Both companies represent the Major Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BCS: 121% vs. MUFG: 95%
Market capitalization -- BCS: $34.89B vs. MUFG: $116.09B
BCS [@Major Banks] is valued at $34.89B. MUFG’s [@Major Banks] market capitalization is $116.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Major Banks] industry ranges from $573.02B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Major Banks] industry is $89.36B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BCS’s FA Score shows that 4 FA rating(s) are green whileMUFG’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BCS’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
  • MUFG’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BCS is a better buy in the long-term than MUFG.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BCS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MUFG’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MUFG’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MUFG is a better buy in the short-term than BCS.

Price Growth

BCS (@Major Banks) experienced а +0.27% price change this week, while MUFG (@Major Banks) price change was +4.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Major Banks industry was +1.33%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.73%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

BCS is expected to report earnings on Apr 24, 2025.

MUFG is expected to report earnings on May 19, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Major Banks (+1.33% weekly)

Major banks are among the biggest companies in the world, often times with global reach and market capitalizations in the multi-billions. Large banks often have multiple arms spanning different disciplines, from deposits, to investment banking, to wealth management and insurance. The biggest banks often have key competitive advantages over smaller players in the industry in terms of brand recognition, cost of capital, and efficiency. Think J.P. Morgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MUFG($116B) has a higher market cap than BCS($34.9B). MUFG has higher P/E ratio than BCS: MUFG (8.85) vs BCS (6.84). BCS YTD gains are higher at: 11.362 vs. MUFG (8.788). BCS has less debt than MUFG: BCS (177B) vs MUFG (48.64T). MUFG has higher revenues than BCS: MUFG (5.66T) vs BCS (25.4B).
BCSMUFGBCS / MUFG
Capitalization34.9B116B30%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.3628.788129%
P/E Ratio6.848.8577%
Revenue25.4B5.66T0%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt177B48.64T0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BCS vs MUFG: Fundamental Ratings
BCS
MUFG
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2019
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
14
Undervalued
64
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
265
SMR RATING
1..100
41
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3840
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
516
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BCS's Valuation (14) in the Major Banks industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MUFG (64). This means that BCS’s stock grew somewhat faster than MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (26). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

MUFG's SMR Rating (1) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as BCS (4). This means that MUFG’s stock grew similarly to BCS’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (40). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

BCS's P/E Growth Rating (5) in the Major Banks industry is in the same range as MUFG (16). This means that BCS’s stock grew similarly to MUFG’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BCSMUFG
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
67%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
66%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
65%
Bearish Trend 30 days ago
51%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
52%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
43%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BCS
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MUFG
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MSN0.530.04
+7.72%
Emerson Radio Corp
CHWY39.800.85
+2.18%
Chewy
QTWO97.701.20
+1.24%
Q2 Holdings
CFFN5.86N/A
N/A
Capitol Federal Financial
ESSA20.92-0.38
-1.78%
ESSA Bancorp

BCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BCS has been closely correlated with NWG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 69% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BCS jumps, then NWG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BCS
1D Price
Change %
BCS100%
+0.89%
NWG - BCS
69%
Closely correlated
+0.46%
SCBFY - BCS
58%
Loosely correlated
+0.52%
SAN - BCS
54%
Loosely correlated
+1.17%
UBS - BCS
51%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
C - BCS
51%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
More

MUFG and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MUFG has been closely correlated with SMFG. These tickers have moved in lockstep 91% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if MUFG jumps, then SMFG could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MUFG
1D Price
Change %
MUFG100%
+0.08%
SMFG - MUFG
91%
Closely correlated
-0.33%
C - MUFG
45%
Loosely correlated
+1.53%
BCS - MUFG
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.89%
UBS - MUFG
41%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
WFC - MUFG
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.57%
More