The 10-day moving average for BEBE crossed bullishly above the 50-day moving average on September 14, 2026. This indicates that the trend has shifted higher and could be considered a buy signal. In 9 of 14 past instances when the 10-day crossed above the 50-day, the stock continued to move higher over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 64%.
The Momentum Indicator moved above the 0 level on September 29, 2026. You may want to consider a long position or call options on BEBE as a result. In 37 of 82 past instances where the momentum indicator moved above 0, the stock continued to climb. The odds of a continued upward trend are 45%.
The Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) for BEBE just turned positive on October 15, 2026. Looking at past instances where BEBE's MACD turned positive, the stock continued to rise in 25 of 43 cases over the following month. The odds of a continued upward trend are 58%.
The Aroon Indicator entered an Uptrend today. In 53 of 100 cases where BEBE Aroon's Indicator entered an Uptrend, the price rose further within the following month. The odds of a continued Uptrend are 53%.
The Stochastic Oscillator demonstrated that the ticker has stayed in the overbought zone for 8 days. The longer the ticker stays in the overbought zone, the sooner a price pull-back is expected.
BEBE broke above its upper Bollinger Band on October 15, 2026. This could be a sign that the stock is set to drop as the stock moves back below the upper band and toward the middle band. You may want to consider selling the stock or exploring put options.
The Tickeron Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for this company is 10 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating low risk on high returns. The average Profit vs. Risk Rating rating for the industry is 99, placing this stock better than average.
The Tickeron PE Growth Rating for this company is 38 (best 1 - 100 worst), pointing to consistent earnings growth. The PE Growth rating is based on a comparative analysis of stock PE ratio increase over the last 12 months compared against S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron Price Growth Rating for this company is 53 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating fairly steady price growth. BEBE’s price grows at a lower rate over the last 12 months as compared to S&P 500 index constituents.
The Tickeron SMR rating for this company is 90 (best 1 - 100 worst), indicating slightly better than average sales and a considerably profitable business model. SMR (Sales, Margin, Return on Equity) rating is based on comparative analysis of weighted Sales, Income Margin and Return on Equity values compared against S&P 500 index constituents. The weighted SMR value is a proprietary formula developed by Tickeron and represents an overall profitability measure for a stock.
The Tickeron Valuation Rating of 98 (best 1 - 100 worst) indicates that the company is significantly overvalued in the industry. This rating compares market capitalization estimated by our proprietary formula with the current market capitalization. This rating is based on the following metrics, as compared to industry averages: P/B Ratio (1.376) is normal, around the industry mean (-540.298). P/E Ratio (505.000) is within average values for comparable stocks, (115.825). Projected Growth (PEG Ratio) (0.040) is also within normal values, averaging (15.932). BEBE's Dividend Yield (0.792) is considerably higher than the industry average of (0.020). BEBE's P/S Ratio (0.000) is very low in comparison to the industry average of (3.158).
BEBE | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 10 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 38 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| BEBE | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 45% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 58% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 50% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 42% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 65% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 53% |
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BEBE’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while HVMC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BEBE’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
BEBE (@Financial Conglomerates) experienced а +0.50% price change this week, while HVMC (@Financial Conglomerates) price change was -0.10% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Financial Conglomerates industry was -0.37%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +2.46%.
Financial conglomerates usually encompass a wide range of financial services including (not necessarily limited to) investment banking, insurance, capital raising/underwriting, trading of financial securities, investment advisory services, wealth management of high net-worth individuals, and retail banking. Think Citigroup, American Express Company, ING Group.
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| QB | 48.90 | 0.25 | +0.51% |
| ProShares Nasdaq-100 Dynamic Buffer ETF (QB) | |||
| IYJ | 156.34 | -0.58 | -0.37% |
| iShares U.S. Industrials ETF (IYJ) | |||
| GEMD | 39.90 | -0.22 | -0.55% |
| Goldman Sachs Access Emerging Markets USD Bond ETF (GEMD) | |||
| FIDI | 28.56 | -0.24 | -0.83% |
| Fidelity International High Dividend ETF (FIDI) | |||
| ROBN | 23.20 | -1.17 | -4.80% |
| T-Rex 2X Long HOOD Daily Target ETF | |||
A.I.dvisor tells us that HVMC and NMPAU have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that HVMC and NMPAU's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HVMC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HVMC | 100% | N/A | ||
| NMPAU - HVMC | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| BEBE - HVMC | 21% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| NMP - HVMC | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.29% | ||
| BACCU - HVMC | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| MKLY - HVMC | 19% Poorly correlated | +0.19% | ||
More | ||||