BEN
Price
$25.53
Change
+$0.11 (+0.43%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
13.26B
61 days until earnings call
BN
Price
$65.34
Change
-$0.98 (-1.48%)
Updated
Sep 3 closing price
Capitalization
98.09B
70 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs BN

Header iconBEN vs BN Comparison
Open Charts BEN vs BNBanner chart's image
Franklin Resources
Price$25.53
Change+$0.11 (+0.43%)
Volume$2.69M
Capitalization13.26B
Brookfield
Price$65.34
Change-$0.98 (-1.48%)
Volume$1.98M
Capitalization98.09B
BEN vs BN Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
BEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEN vs. BN commentary
Sep 04, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and BN is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 04, 2025
Stock price -- (BEN: $25.53 vs. BN: $65.34)
Brand notoriety: BEN and BN are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 72% vs. BN: 78%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $13.26B vs. BN: $98.09B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $13.26B. BN’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $98.09B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.26B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileBN’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • BN’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BN is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BN’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BEN and BN are a bad buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.43% price change this week, while BN (@Investment Managers) price change was -0.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.99%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.25%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2025.

BN is expected to report earnings on Nov 13, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.55% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BN($98.1B) has a higher market cap than BEN($13.3B). BN has higher P/E ratio than BEN: BN (148.50) vs BEN (50.06). BEN YTD gains are higher at: 29.717 vs. BN (14.118). BN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 30.3B vs. BEN (1.13B). BN has more cash in the bank: 22.9B vs. BEN (3.96B). BEN has less debt than BN: BEN (13.2B) vs BN (251B). BN has higher revenues than BEN: BN (76.1B) vs BEN (8.64B).
BENBNBEN / BN
Capitalization13.3B98.1B14%
EBITDA1.13B30.3B4%
Gain YTD29.71714.118210%
P/E Ratio50.06148.5034%
Revenue8.64B76.1B11%
Total Cash3.96B22.9B17%
Total Debt13.2B251B5%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs BN: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
BN
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
6363
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
15
Undervalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
6322
SMR RATING
1..100
8990
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
1346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
411
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5085

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (15) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (33). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BN's Profit vs Risk Rating (22) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (63). This means that BN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's SMR Rating (89) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (90). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (13) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BN (46). This means that BEN’s stock grew somewhat faster than BN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's P/E Growth Rating (4) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as BN (11). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to BN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENBN
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
47%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
59%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 22 days ago
65%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
70%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BN
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BTCO111.991.46
+1.32%
Invesco Galaxy Bitcoin ETF
CIK2.96N/A
+0.17%
Credit Suisse Asset Management Income Fund
PHLLF3.10N/A
N/A
PETERSHILL PARTNERS PLC.
FNDA30.93-0.05
-0.16%
Schwab Fundamental U.S. Small CompanyETF
UMDD25.05-0.13
-0.53%
ProShares UltraPro MidCap400

BN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BN has been closely correlated with BAM. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BN jumps, then BAM could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BN
1D Price
Change %
BN100%
-1.48%
BAM - BN
84%
Closely correlated
-1.05%
JHG - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-0.65%
KKR - BN
81%
Closely correlated
-2.82%
BX - BN
80%
Closely correlated
-1.30%
APO - BN
79%
Closely correlated
-2.36%
More