BEN
Price
$33.56
Change
-$0.30 (-0.89%)
Updated
Aug 14, 12:10 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
17.2B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
WT
Price
$22.73
Change
+$0.03 (+0.13%)
Updated
Aug 14, 01:56 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.44B
70 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BEN vs WT

BEN vs WT Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BEN vs. WT commentary
Aug 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEN is a Hold and WT is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BEN: $33.86 vs. WT: $22.70)
Brand notoriety: BEN: Not notable vs. WT: Notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BEN: 40% vs. WT: 43%
Market capitalization -- BEN: $17.2B vs. WT: $3.44B
BEN [@Investment Managers] is valued at $17.2B. WT’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $3.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $183.19B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $10.2B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BEN’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileWT’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BEN’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • WT’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the long-term than BEN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BEN’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while WT’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BEN’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • WT’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, WT is a better buy in the short-term than BEN.

Price Growth

BEN (@Investment Managers) experienced а -0.41% price change this week, while WT (@Investment Managers) price change was +5.82% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.02%.

Reported Earning Dates

BEN is expected to report earnings on Nov 03, 2026.

WT is expected to report earnings on Oct 23, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.82% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BEN($17.2B) has a higher market cap than WT($3.44B). WT has higher P/E ratio than BEN: WT (41.27) vs BEN (23.03). WT YTD gains are higher at: 87.118 vs. BEN (45.248). BEN has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.83B vs. WT (179M). BEN has more cash in the bank: 276M vs. WT (106M). WT has less debt than BEN: WT (1.2B) vs BEN (15.4B). BEN has higher revenues than WT: BEN (9.03B) vs WT (610M).
BENWTBEN / WT
Capitalization17.2B3.44B500%
EBITDA1.83B179M1,022%
Gain YTD45.24887.11852%
P/E Ratio23.0341.2756%
Revenue9.03B610M1,480%
Total Cash276M106M260%
Total Debt15.4B1.2B1,280%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BEN vs WT: Fundamental Ratings
BEN
WT
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8185
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
10
Undervalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
585
SMR RATING
1..100
8450
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
2938
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9726
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
9050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BEN's Valuation (10) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for WT (87). This means that BEN’s stock grew significantly faster than WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (58). This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

WT's SMR Rating (50) in the Investment Managers industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BEN (84). This means that WT’s stock grew somewhat faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

BEN's Price Growth Rating (29) in the Investment Managers industry is in the same range as WT (38). This means that BEN’s stock grew similarly to WT’s over the last 12 months.

WT's P/E Growth Rating (26) in the Investment Managers industry is significantly better than the same rating for BEN (97). This means that WT’s stock grew significantly faster than BEN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BENWT
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
76%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
74%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
73%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BEN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
WT
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
INTA41.021.49
+3.77%
Intapp
MHH7.930.21
+2.72%
Mastech Digital
MLAB113.200.40
+0.35%
Mesa Laboratories
AS33.120.09
+0.27%
Amer Sports
MBIO0.59-0.01
-2.32%
Mustang Bio Inc

BEN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BEN has been closely correlated with AMP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 68% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BEN jumps, then AMP could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BEN
1D Price
Change %
BEN100%
+0.80%
AMP - BEN
68%
Closely correlated
+0.99%
BAM - BEN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.50%
IVZ - BEN
62%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
PFG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+1.02%
CG - BEN
61%
Loosely correlated
+6.51%
More

WT and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WT has been loosely correlated with VRTS. These tickers have moved in lockstep 62% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WT jumps, then VRTS could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WT
1D Price
Change %
WT100%
-0.13%
VRTS - WT
62%
Loosely correlated
+1.58%
BEN - WT
53%
Loosely correlated
+0.80%
IVZ - WT
50%
Loosely correlated
+2.60%
APAM - WT
49%
Loosely correlated
+2.15%
BBUC - WT
47%
Loosely correlated
+1.35%
More