Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BEQAX vs RWMFX
BEQAX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts BEQAX vs RWMFX
BEQAX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BEQAX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BEQAX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 218B vs. BEQAX (1.92B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than BEQAX: RWMFX (1.44) vs BEQAX (0.25). BEQAX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: BEQAX (29 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). BEQAX (0.90) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). BEQAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 73.00 vs. RWMFX (29.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than BEQAX: RWMFX (250) vs BEQAX (2500). BEQAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.32 vs. RWMFX (6.68). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 27.90 vs. BEQAX (7.51).
| BEQAX | RWMFX | BEQAX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.31 | 290% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 0.31 | 290% |
| Fund Existence | 29 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.347 | 3.982 | 210% |
| Front Load | 6% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.92B | 218B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.25 | 1.44 | 17% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.32 | 6.68 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 56.63 | 30.63 | 185% |
| Returns for 5 years | 7.51 | 27.90 | 27% |
| Returns for 10 years | 50.61 | 81.85 | 62% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement