BFAM
Price
$65.19
Change
+$1.17 (+1.83%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:03 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
3.37B
42 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CSV
Price
$39.41
Change
+$1.15 (+3.01%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
607.28M
36 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs CSV

BFAM vs CSV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. CSV commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Hold and CSV is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BFAM: $64.02 vs. CSV: $38.26)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and CSV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 65% vs. CSV: 87%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $3.37B vs. CSV: $607.28M
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $3.37B. CSV’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $607.28M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $21.38B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $3.51B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSV is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSV’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CSV’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CSV is a better buy in the short-term than BFAM.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а +0.33% price change this week, while CSV (@Personnel Services) price change was -0.86% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was +98.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +28.23%, and the average quarterly price growth was -29.38%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

CSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (+98.24% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($3.37B) has a higher market cap than CSV($607M). BFAM has higher P/E ratio than CSV: BFAM (19.28) vs CSV (13.91). CSV YTD gains are higher at: -9.105 vs. BFAM (-36.864). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 412M vs. CSV (117M). BFAM has more cash in the bank: 133M vs. CSV (2.91M). CSV has less debt than BFAM: CSV (546M) vs BFAM (1.87B). BFAM has higher revenues than CSV: BFAM (2.98B) vs CSV (416M).
BFAMCSVBFAM / CSV
Capitalization3.37B607M555%
EBITDA412M117M352%
Gain YTD-36.864-9.105405%
P/E Ratio19.2813.91139%
Revenue2.98B416M716%
Total Cash133M2.91M4,574%
Total Debt1.87B546M343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM vs CSV: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
CSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
727
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10095
SMR RATING
1..100
5649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7973
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9457
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a85

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSV's Valuation (17) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (95) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's SMR Rating (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Price Growth Rating (73) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (79) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's P/E Growth Rating (57) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMCSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 9 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 21 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CSV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GSCKX20.62N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs International Eq Inc C
HSTAX95.70N/A
N/A
Hartford Stock HLS IA
PAVLX53.04N/A
N/A
T. Rowe Price Value Adv
JIAFX9.87N/A
N/A
JHancock Multi-Asset High Income A
BHCFX19.94N/A
N/A
Baron Health Care Retail

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFAM and TNL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFAM and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
-0.47%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-2.62%
CSV - BFAM
31%
Poorly correlated
+0.26%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.26%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-2.20%
RCL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
More