BFAM
Price
$74.76
Change
+$1.45 (+1.98%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
3.93B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
CSV
Price
$39.41
Change
+$1.54 (+4.07%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
625.53M
15 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BFAM vs CSV

BFAM vs CSV Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFAM vs. CSV commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a Buy and CSV is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BFAM: $74.76 vs. CSV: $39.41)
Brand notoriety: BFAM and CSV are both not notable
Both companies represent the Personnel Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFAM: 59% vs. CSV: 109%
Market capitalization -- BFAM: $3.93B vs. CSV: $625.53M
BFAM [@Personnel Services] is valued at $3.93B. CSV’s [@Personnel Services] market capitalization is $625.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Personnel Services] industry ranges from $21.63B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Personnel Services] industry is $4.04B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCSV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CSV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, CSV is a better buy in the long-term than BFAM.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFAM’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CSV’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFAM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • CSV’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, both BFAM and CSV are a good buy in the short-term.

Price Growth

BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -1.25% price change this week, while CSV (@Personnel Services) price change was +2.98% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -1.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was -20.01%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFAM is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

CSV is expected to report earnings on Jul 29, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Personnel Services (-1.69% weekly)

Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BFAM($3.93B) has a higher market cap than CSV($626M). BFAM has higher P/E ratio than CSV: BFAM (22.52) vs CSV (14.33). CSV YTD gains are higher at: -6.373 vs. BFAM (-26.272). BFAM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 412M vs. CSV (117M). BFAM has more cash in the bank: 133M vs. CSV (2.91M). CSV has less debt than BFAM: CSV (546M) vs BFAM (1.87B). BFAM has higher revenues than CSV: BFAM (2.98B) vs CSV (416M).
BFAMCSVBFAM / CSV
Capitalization3.93B626M628%
EBITDA412M117M352%
Gain YTD-26.272-6.373412%
P/E Ratio22.5214.33157%
Revenue2.98B416M716%
Total Cash133M2.91M4,574%
Total Debt1.87B546M343%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFAM vs CSV: Fundamental Ratings
BFAM
CSV
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
2887
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
94
Overvalued
19
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10093
SMR RATING
1..100
5649
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6174
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9260
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
1250

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CSV's Valuation (19) in the Other Consumer Services industry is significantly better than the same rating for BFAM (94) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew significantly faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's Profit vs Risk Rating (93) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's SMR Rating (49) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

BFAM's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as CSV (74) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew similarly to CSV’s over the last 12 months.

CSV's P/E Growth Rating (60) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (92) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that CSV’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFAMCSV
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
68%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
52%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
56%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
66%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BFAM
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
CSV
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PSCT83.97N/A
N/A
Invesco S&P SmallCap Info Tech ETF
PSTR30.96N/A
N/A
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
EVX41.34-0.16
-0.39%
VanEck Environmental Svcs ETF
UBEW27.99-0.12
-0.44%
Roundhill UBER WeeklyPay ETF
CGBL37.34-0.33
-0.88%
Capital Group Core Balanced ETF

BFAM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BFAM and TNL have been poorly correlated (+33% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BFAM and TNL's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFAM
1D Price
Change %
BFAM100%
+1.98%
TNL - BFAM
33%
Poorly correlated
-1.60%
CSV - BFAM
31%
Poorly correlated
+4.07%
ABNB - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-1.54%
CCL - BFAM
30%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
RCL - BFAM
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.14%
More

CSV and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CSV has been loosely correlated with SCI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 59% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CSV jumps, then SCI could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CSV
1D Price
Change %
CSV100%
+4.07%
SCI - CSV
59%
Loosely correlated
+2.80%
NCLH - CSV
40%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
ROL - CSV
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.01%
TNL - CSV
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.60%
BKNG - CSV
36%
Loosely correlated
-1.45%
More