Advertisement
BFAM vs LIND
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFAM is a StrongBuy and LIND is a StrongBuy.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFAM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileLIND’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFAM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- LIND’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFAM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LIND’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFAM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
- LIND’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
BFAM (@Personnel Services) experienced а -1.06% price change this week, while LIND (@Consumer Sundries) price change was -2.96% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Personnel Services industry was -1.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was -19.56%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Consumer Sundries industry was -1.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.53%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFAM is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.
LIND is expected to report earnings on Aug 03, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Personnel Services (-1.89% weekly)Personnel Services comprise companies that provide staffing and human resources management solutions for businesses. Each company might be involved in one or more types of recruitment or employee solutions such as permanent or temporary staffing, career consulting, outsourcing, administrative services and many more. Some personnel services companies cater to large businesses, while some specialize in providing services to small/medium-sized organizations. These specialized services potentially expedite the process of getting the ‘right’ candidates and/or training them to meet the requirements of a business process. Some of the companies also cover other critical areas like internal auditing for a company. Robert Half International Inc., ManpowerGroup Inc. and Insperity, Inc. are examples of companies in the personnel services industry.
@Consumer Sundries (-1.87% weekly)Consumer sundries companies make products that usually do not have another classification, such as lawn and garden products, pest-control products, pet food and pet products like leashes, collars, and harnesses. Central Garden & Pet Company and Dogness (International) Corporation are examples of companies operating in this industry.
| BFAM | LIND | BFAM / LIND | |
| Capitalization | 3.99B | 1.76B | 226% |
| EBITDA | 412M | 95M | 434% |
| Gain YTD | -25.276 | 86.200 | -29% |
| P/E Ratio | 22.82 | N/A | - |
| Revenue | 2.98B | 799M | 373% |
| Total Cash | 133M | 275M | 48% |
| Total Debt | 1.87B | 665M | 282% |
BFAM | LIND | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 34 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 95 Overvalued | 42 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 55 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 56 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 59 | 36 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 91 | 97 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 1 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
LIND's Valuation (42) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (95) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Profit vs Risk Rating (55) in the Other Consumer Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFAM (100) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
BFAM's SMR Rating (56) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for LIND (100) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew somewhat faster than LIND’s over the last 12 months.
LIND's Price Growth Rating (36) in the Other Consumer Services industry is in the same range as BFAM (59) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry. This means that LIND’s stock grew similarly to BFAM’s over the last 12 months.
BFAM's P/E Growth Rating (91) in the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry is in the same range as LIND (97) in the Other Consumer Services industry. This means that BFAM’s stock grew similarly to LIND’s over the last 12 months.
| BFAM | LIND | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 84% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 58% | 3 days ago 87% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 85% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 79% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 78% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 10 days ago 83% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 88% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 62% | 3 days ago 80% |
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| HSCZ | 42.84 | 0.40 | +0.94% |
| iShares Currency Hdgd MSCI EAFE SmCp ETF | |||
| SCNM | 24.74 | 0.03 | +0.12% |
| Sterling Capital National Muncpl Bd ETF | |||
| WUGI | 86.20 | N/A | N/A |
| AXS Esoterica NextG Economy ETF | |||
| GLBL | 27.80 | N/A | N/A |
| Pacer MSCI World Industry Advantage ETF | |||
| NTSX | 57.81 | -0.03 | -0.05% |
| WisdomTree U.S. Efficient Core Fund | |||
LIND and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LIND has been loosely correlated with VIK. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LIND jumps, then VIK could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LIND | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LIND | 100% | -0.70% | ||
| VIK - LIND | 61% Loosely correlated | +1.00% | ||
| NCLH - LIND | 57% Loosely correlated | +3.53% | ||
| TNL - LIND | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.82% | ||
| PRSU - LIND | 40% Loosely correlated | +0.89% | ||
| BFAM - LIND | 38% Loosely correlated | +1.95% | ||
More | ||||