Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BFGBX vs RGAGX
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison
Open Charts BFGBX vs RGAGX
BlackRock Capital Appreciation K
Price$45.26
Change+$0.37 (+0.82%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.69B
American Funds Growth Fund of Amer R6
Price$86.57
Change+$0.46 (+0.53%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets327.37B
BFGBX vs RGAGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
BFGBX vs. RGAGX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFGBX is a Hold and RGAGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RGAGX has more cash in the bank: 327B vs. BFGBX (3.69B). RGAGX pays higher dividends than BFGBX: RGAGX (0.56) vs BFGBX (0.00). BFGBX was incepted earlier than RGAGX: BFGBX (28 years) vs RGAGX (17 years). BFGBX (0.65) is less costly to investors than RGAGX (0.30). BFGBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. RGAGX (25.00). RGAGX has a lower initial minimum investment than BFGBX: RGAGX (250) vs BFGBX (5000000). RGAGX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.34 vs. BFGBX (0.18). RGAGX return over 5 years is better than : 35.91 vs. BFGBX (11.53).
| BFGBX | RGAGX | BFGBX / RGAGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.62 | 0.30 | 207% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.65 | 0.30 | 217% |
| Fund Existence | 28 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.395 | 16.123 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.69B | 327B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.56 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.18 | 7.34 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 63.83 | 64.06 | 100% |
| Returns for 5 years | 11.53 | 35.91 | 32% |
| Returns for 10 years | 62.17 | 92.33 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement