BFH
Price
$50.06
Change
-$0.41 (-0.81%)
Updated
May 9, 12:24 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.84B
76 days until earnings call
SLM
Price
$31.89
Change
-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Updated
May 9, 01:21 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
4.8B
75 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

BFH vs SLM

Header iconBFH vs SLM Comparison
Open Charts BFH vs SLMBanner chart's image
Bread Financial Holdings
Price$50.06
Change-$0.41 (-0.81%)
Volume$100
Capitalization1.84B
SLM
Price$31.89
Change-$0.07 (-0.22%)
Volume$1.5K
Capitalization4.8B
BFH vs SLM Comparison Chart
Loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BFH vs. SLM commentary
May 09, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFH is a StrongBuy and SLM is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 09, 2025
Stock price -- (BFH: $50.47 vs. SLM: $31.96)
Brand notoriety: BFH and SLM are both notable
Both companies represent the Finance/Rental/Leasing industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BFH: 61% vs. SLM: 68%
Market capitalization -- BFH: $1.84B vs. SLM: $4.8B
BFH [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] is valued at $1.84B. SLM’s [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] market capitalization is $4.8B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry ranges from $573.25B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Finance/Rental/Leasing] industry is $12.84B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BFH’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLM’s FA Score has 4 green FA rating(s).

  • BFH’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLM’s FA Score: 4 green, 1 red.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the long-term than BFH.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BFH’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLM’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BFH’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • SLM’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLM is a better buy in the short-term than BFH.

Price Growth

BFH (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) experienced а +5.61% price change this week, while SLM (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +6.57% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.09%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +13.28%, and the average quarterly price growth was +11.00%.

Reported Earning Dates

BFH is expected to report earnings on Jul 24, 2025.

SLM is expected to report earnings on Jul 23, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.09% weekly)

A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SLM($4.8B) has a higher market cap than BFH($1.84B). SLM has higher P/E ratio than BFH: SLM (8.85) vs BFH (2.44). SLM YTD gains are higher at: 16.401 vs. BFH (-17.059). SLM (5.23B) and BFH (5.44B) have identical debt. BFH has higher revenues than SLM: BFH (4.3B) vs SLM (1.81B).
BFHSLMBFH / SLM
Capitalization1.84B4.8B38%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-17.05916.401-104%
P/E Ratio2.448.8528%
Revenue4.3B1.81B237%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total Debt5.44B5.23B104%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BFH vs SLM: Fundamental Ratings
BFH
SLM
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
1928
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
86
Overvalued
33
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
697
SMR RATING
1..100
68
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5638
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1114
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

SLM's Valuation (33) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (86) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Profit vs Risk Rating (7) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFH (69) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's SMR Rating (6) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as SLM (8) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

SLM's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as BFH (56) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that SLM’s stock grew similarly to BFH’s over the last 12 months.

BFH's P/E Growth Rating (11) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as SLM (14) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that BFH’s stock grew similarly to SLM’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BFHSLM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
69%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
78%
Bearish Trend 29 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
51%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
BFH
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
RSEE27.020.05
+0.18%
Rareview Systematic Equity ETF
BGX12.05-0.01
-0.08%
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
TILL18.49-0.02
-0.13%
Teucrium Agricultural Str No K-1 ETF
PXF53.94-0.15
-0.28%
Invesco RAFI Developed Markets ex-US ETF
DBND45.54-0.19
-0.43%
DoubleLine Opportunistic Core Bond ETF

BFH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFH has been closely correlated with SYF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 84% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFH jumps, then SYF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BFH
1D Price
Change %
BFH100%
+3.74%
SYF - BFH
84%
Closely correlated
+3.14%
ENVA - BFH
75%
Closely correlated
+3.42%
OMF - BFH
71%
Closely correlated
+2.71%
ALLY - BFH
70%
Closely correlated
+3.05%
SLM - BFH
66%
Closely correlated
+1.40%
More