BFS vs CXW
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BFS is a Sell and CXW is a Sell.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BFS’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCXW’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BFS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
- CXW’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BFS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CXW’s TA Score has 7 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BFS’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 7 bearish.
- CXW’s TA Score: 7 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BFS (@Real Estate Investment Trusts) experienced а -5.74% price change this week, while CXW (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -5.15% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Real Estate Investment Trusts industry was -2.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.77%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.01%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was -2.43%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.06%, and the average quarterly price growth was -1.20%.
Reported Earning Dates
BFS is expected to report earnings on Feb 27, 2025.
CXW is expected to report earnings on Feb 05, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Real Estate Investment Trusts (-2.85% weekly)A real estate investment trust (REIT) is a company any that owns, and in most cases, operates, income-producing real estate – ranging from office and apartment buildings to warehouses, hospitals, shopping centers, hotels and timberlands. Some REITs are involved in financing real estate. Equity REITs invest in and own properties, while mortgage REITs own and invest in property mortgages. REITs are required by law to pay out at least 90% of their annual taxable income (excluding capital gains) to shareholders in the form of dividends. Some REITs could be more cyclical than others; for example, when an economy is undergoing a recession, hotel REITs could be more vulnerable, compared to say healthcare REIT given that healthcare needs are less likely to depend on economic cycles. American Tower Corporation, Prologis, Inc. and Crown Castle International Corp are some of the biggest REIT companies in the U.S.
@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (-2.43% weekly)The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.
| BFS | CXW | BFS / CXW | |
| Capitalization | 912M | 1.75B | 52% |
| EBITDA | 165M | 296M | 56% |
| Gain YTD | 6.717 | 47.006 | 14% |
| P/E Ratio | 21.97 | 26.34 | 83% |
| Revenue | 257M | 1.9B | 14% |
| Total Cash | 8.41M | 122M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 1.39B | 1.21B | 115% |
BFS | CXW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 84 | 94 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 51 Fair valued | 99 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 50 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 41 | 80 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 52 | 35 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 67 | 34 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BFS's Valuation (51) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (99). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's Profit vs Risk Rating (50) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFS (100). This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFS’s over the last 12 months.
BFS's SMR Rating (41) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for CXW (80). This means that BFS’s stock grew somewhat faster than CXW’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's Price Growth Rating (35) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is in the same range as BFS (52). This means that CXW’s stock grew similarly to BFS’s over the last 12 months.
CXW's P/E Growth Rating (34) in the Real Estate Investment Trusts industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BFS (67). This means that CXW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BFS’s over the last 12 months.
| BFS | CXW | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 61% | 3 days ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 75% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 69% | 3 days ago 77% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% | 3 days ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 59% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 60% | 7 days ago 70% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 57% | 3 days ago 74% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 74% | 3 days ago 73% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 50% | 3 days ago 76% |
BFS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BFS has been closely correlated with UE. These tickers have moved in lockstep 76% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if BFS jumps, then UE could also see price increases.
CXW and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CXW has been closely correlated with GEO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 70% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if CXW jumps, then GEO could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CXW | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CXW | 100% | -0.33% | ||
| GEO - CXW | 70% Closely correlated | +1.92% | ||
| ALEX - CXW | 47% Loosely correlated | +1.15% | ||
| KIM - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.69% | ||
| GOOD - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.42% | ||
| BFS - CXW | 45% Loosely correlated | -0.08% | ||
More | ||||