Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKIX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$6.97
Change-$0.04 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.16M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$52.95
Change-$0.22 (-0.41%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.81B
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.81B vs. BGCDX (3.16M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: BGCDX (1.49) vs FHKIX (1.00). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKIX (18 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKIX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 36.75 vs. BGCDX (33.96).
| BGCDX | FHKIX | BGCDX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.90 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.90 | 1,194% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 36.399 | 37.818 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.16M | 1.81B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.49 | 1.00 | 150% |
| Returns for 1 year | 33.96 | 36.75 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 30.23 | 78.49 | 39% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 0.31 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 86.94 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement