Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
BGCDX vs FHKIX
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison
Open Charts BGCDX vs FHKIX
Baillie Gifford China Equities K
Price$7.40
Change-$0.06 (-0.80%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets3.37M
Fidelity Advisor China Region I
Price$55.83
Change-$0.49 (-0.87%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.6B
BGCDX vs FHKIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FHKIX has more cash in the bank: 1.6B vs. BGCDX (3.37M). BGCDX pays higher dividends than FHKIX: BGCDX (1.45) vs FHKIX (1.02). BGCDX was incepted earlier than FHKIX: BGCDX (4 years) vs FHKIX (17 years). BGCDX (10.75) is less costly to investors than FHKIX (0.90). FHKIX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. BGCDX (25.00). FHKIX has a lower initial minimum investment than BGCDX: FHKIX (0) vs BGCDX (10000000). FHKIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 28.35 vs. BGCDX (17.82).
| BGCDX | FHKIX | BGCDX / FHKIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.87 | 0.90 | 97% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 10.75 | 0.90 | 1,194% |
| Fund Existence | 4 years | 17 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 44.814 | 45.982 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000000 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 3.37M | 1.6B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.45 | 1.02 | 142% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.82 | 28.35 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.48 | 101.65 | 44% |
| Returns for 5 years | N/A | 16.68 | - |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 104.80 | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement