BGLC
Price
$1.73
Change
-$0.08 (-4.42%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
4.21M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
KWR
Price
$147.98
Change
-$0.19 (-0.13%)
Updated
Jul 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.57B
21 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGLC vs KWR

BGLC vs KWR Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGLC vs. KWR commentary
Jul 14, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGLC is a Buy and KWR is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 14, 2026
Stock price -- (BGLC: $1.73 vs. KWR: $147.98)
Brand notoriety: BGLC and KWR are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGLC: 0% vs. KWR: 69%
Market capitalization -- BGLC: $4.21M vs. KWR: $2.57B
BGLC [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $4.21M. KWR’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $2.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $242.3B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $12.37B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGLC’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileKWR’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • BGLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • KWR’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, KWR is a better buy in the long-term than BGLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGLC’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while KWR’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGLC’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • KWR’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, KWR is a better buy in the short-term than BGLC.

Price Growth

BGLC (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а -12.18% price change this week, while KWR (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -7.18% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -3.89%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.39%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.13%.

Reported Earning Dates

KWR is expected to report earnings on Aug 04, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-3.89% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
KWR($2.57B) has a higher market cap than BGLC($4.21M). KWR YTD gains are higher at: 8.537 vs. BGLC (-56.203). KWR has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 156M vs. BGLC (-2.71M). KWR has more cash in the bank: 170M vs. BGLC (3.97M). BGLC has less debt than KWR: BGLC (216K) vs KWR (897M). KWR has higher revenues than BGLC: KWR (1.93B) vs BGLC (5.31M).
BGLCKWRBGLC / KWR
Capitalization4.21M2.57B0%
EBITDA-2.71M156M-2%
Gain YTD-56.2038.537-658%
P/E RatioN/A569.15-
Revenue5.31M1.93B0%
Total Cash3.97M170M2%
Total Debt216K897M0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGLC vs KWR: Fundamental Ratings
BGLC
KWR
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5174
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
97
Overvalued
87
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9891
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
8446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
11
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3690

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

KWR's Valuation (87) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (97) in the null industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

KWR's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (100) in the null industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

KWR's SMR Rating (91) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (98) in the null industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

KWR's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGLC (84) in the null industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

KWR's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (1) in the null industry. This means that KWR’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGLCKWR
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
78%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
81%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
72%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
63%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 5 days ago
73%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
61%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
KWR
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
REIT30.56N/A
N/A
ALPS Active REIT ETF
MILK24.29-0.10
-0.41%
Pacer US Cash Cows Bond ETF
BUFG29.39-0.12
-0.42%
FT Vest Buffered Allocation Gr ETF
QETH17.65-0.17
-0.95%
Invesco Galaxy Ethereum ETF
XNTK357.98-10.88
-2.95%
State Street® SPDR® NYSE Technology ETF

KWR and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, KWR has been closely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 71% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if KWR jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To KWR
1D Price
Change %
KWR100%
-0.13%
OLN - KWR
71%
Closely correlated
+2.27%
HUN - KWR
66%
Closely correlated
+4.31%
AVNT - KWR
65%
Loosely correlated
-1.28%
IOSP - KWR
63%
Loosely correlated
+0.50%
FUL - KWR
61%
Loosely correlated
+0.27%
More