ASH
Price
$63.92
Change
-$3.77 (-5.57%)
Updated
Jun 23, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
2.93B
35 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BGLC
Price
$2.24
Change
-$0.18 (-7.44%)
Updated
Jun 23, 03:07 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
5.85M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASH vs BGLC

ASH vs BGLC Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASH vs. BGLC commentary
Jun 24, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASH is a Hold and BGLC is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 24, 2026
Stock price -- (ASH: $67.69 vs. BGLC: $2.42)
Brand notoriety: ASH and BGLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASH: 65% vs. BGLC: 10%
Market capitalization -- ASH: $3.1B vs. BGLC: $5.85M
ASH [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.1B. BGLC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $5.85M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $238.9B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $12.46B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBGLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BGLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASH is a better buy in the long-term than BGLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASH’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BGLC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASH’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BGLC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGLC is a better buy in the short-term than ASH.

Price Growth

ASH (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +3.44% price change this week, while BGLC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -3.20% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -1.31%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +16.77%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASH is expected to report earnings on Jul 28, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-1.31% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASH($2.93B) has a higher market cap than BGLC($5.85M). ASH YTD gains are higher at: 16.997 vs. BGLC (-38.734). BGLC has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -2.71M vs. ASH (-354M). ASH has more cash in the bank: 343M vs. BGLC (3.97M). BGLC has less debt than ASH: BGLC (216K) vs ASH (1.48B). ASH has higher revenues than BGLC: ASH (1.81B) vs BGLC (5.31M).
ASHBGLCASH / BGLC
Capitalization2.93B5.85M50,051%
EBITDA-354M-2.71M13,039%
Gain YTD16.997-38.734-44%
P/E Ratio18.02N/A-
Revenue1.81B5.31M34,043%
Total Cash343M3.97M8,651%
Total Debt1.48B216K684,259%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASH: Fundamental Ratings
ASH
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
35
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
98
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
39
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
80
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
49

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASHBGLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
68%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
50%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 14 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BGLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ZJUL29.890.03
+0.12%
Innovator Eq Dfnd Prot ETF - 1Yr Jul
KWT37.39N/A
N/A
iShares® MSCI Kuwait ETF
FLCB21.33-0.04
-0.19%
Franklin U.S. Core Bond ETF
GMAR44.10-0.09
-0.20%
FT Vest U.S. Eq Mod Buffr ETF - Mar
AMDD2.84-0.07
-2.37%
Direxion Daily AMD Bear 1X Shares

ASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASH has been loosely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASH jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASH
1D Price
Change %
ASH100%
-0.34%
OLN - ASH
60%
Loosely correlated
-2.14%
DOW - ASH
59%
Loosely correlated
-2.96%
FUL - ASH
58%
Loosely correlated
-0.85%
TROX - ASH
56%
Loosely correlated
-0.81%
ASIX - ASH
55%
Loosely correlated
-1.91%
More

BGLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGLC and NTIC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGLC and NTIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGLC
1D Price
Change %
BGLC100%
-7.28%
NTIC - BGLC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ASH - BGLC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.34%
AVTR - BGLC
16%
Poorly correlated
-2.40%
KWR - BGLC
12%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
IOSP - BGLC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.31%
More