ASH
Price
$72.61
Change
-$0.09 (-0.12%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.33B
99 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
BGLC
Price
$1.27
Change
-$0.03 (-2.31%)
Updated
Jul 31 closing price
Capitalization
3.19M
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

ASH vs BGLC

ASH vs BGLC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
ASH vs. BGLC commentary
Aug 03, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is ASH is a Hold and BGLC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 03, 2026
Stock price -- (ASH: $72.61 vs. BGLC: $1.27)
Brand notoriety: ASH and BGLC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Chemicals: Specialty industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: ASH: 55% vs. BGLC: 6%
Market capitalization -- ASH: $3.33B vs. BGLC: $3.19M
ASH [@Chemicals: Specialty] is valued at $3.33B. BGLC’s [@Chemicals: Specialty] market capitalization is $3.19M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry ranges from $221.18B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Chemicals: Specialty] industry is $11.74B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

ASH’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBGLC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • ASH’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BGLC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASH is a better buy in the long-term than BGLC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASH’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BGLC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • ASH’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BGLC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 6 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, ASH is a better buy in the short-term than BGLC.

Price Growth

ASH (@Chemicals: Specialty) experienced а +9.35% price change this week, while BGLC (@Chemicals: Specialty) price change was -15.89% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Chemicals: Specialty industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.98%, and the average quarterly price growth was +7.69%.

Reported Earning Dates

ASH is expected to report earnings on Nov 10, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Chemicals: Specialty (-0.32% weekly)

The specialty chemicals sector includes companies that produce chemicals and industrial gases, which are of relatively high-value, often made to customer specifications. Examples of specialty chemicals are electronic chemicals, industrial gases, coatings, adhesives and sealants, industrial and institutional cleaning chemicals. The products are often valued on the basis of their purposes/performances rather than for their composition. Linde Plc, Ecolab Inc., Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., and Dow, Inc. are some of the largest companies making specialty chemicals.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
ASH($3.33B) has a higher market cap than BGLC($3.19M). ASH YTD gains are higher at: 25.501 vs. BGLC (-67.848). ASH has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 378M vs. BGLC (-2.71M). ASH has more cash in the bank: 440M vs. BGLC (3.97M). BGLC has less debt than ASH: BGLC (216K) vs ASH (1.48B). ASH has higher revenues than BGLC: ASH (1.84B) vs BGLC (5.31M).
ASHBGLCASH / BGLC
Capitalization3.33B3.19M104,199%
EBITDA378M-2.71M-13,923%
Gain YTD25.501-67.848-38%
P/E Ratio46.54N/A-
Revenue1.84B5.31M34,683%
Total Cash440M3.97M11,097%
Total Debt1.48B216K683,333%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
ASH vs BGLC: Fundamental Ratings
ASH
BGLC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8250
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
28
Undervalued
97
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
8998
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3892
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
492
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASH's Valuation (28) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGLC (97) in the null industry. This means that ASH’s stock grew significantly faster than BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

ASH's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (100) in the null industry. This means that ASH’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

ASH's SMR Rating (89) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is in the same range as BGLC (98) in the null industry. This means that ASH’s stock grew similarly to BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

ASH's Price Growth Rating (38) in the Chemicals Specialty industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGLC (92) in the null industry. This means that ASH’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGLC’s over the last 12 months.

BGLC's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASH (49) in the Chemicals Specialty industry. This means that BGLC’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASH’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
ASHBGLC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
41%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
73%
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
68%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
54%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
58%
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASH
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
BGLC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
XT79.570.53
+0.67%
iShares Future Exponential Techs ETF
DDEC47.720.14
+0.29%
FT Vest US Equity Dp Bfr ETF Dec
BILT28.210.03
+0.11%
iShares Infrastructure Active ETF
EIRL79.61-0.29
-0.36%
iShares MSCI Ireland ETF
COIW7.57-1.11
-12.79%
Roundhill COIN WeeklyPay ETF

ASH and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, ASH has been loosely correlated with OLN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if ASH jumps, then OLN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASH
1D Price
Change %
ASH100%
-0.12%
OLN - ASH
60%
Loosely correlated
-16.51%
DOW - ASH
59%
Loosely correlated
+0.66%
TROX - ASH
56%
Loosely correlated
-6.71%
ASIX - ASH
55%
Loosely correlated
-2.62%
FUL - ASH
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.14%
More

BGLC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BGLC and NTIC have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BGLC and NTIC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGLC
1D Price
Change %
BGLC100%
-2.31%
NTIC - BGLC
22%
Poorly correlated
+0.50%
ASH - BGLC
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.12%
AVTR - BGLC
16%
Poorly correlated
-0.58%
KWR - BGLC
12%
Poorly correlated
+3.61%
IOSP - BGLC
10%
Poorly correlated
-0.10%
More