Advertisement
BGS vs DDC
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Hold and DDC is a Hold.
BGS | DDC | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 13 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 35 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 94 | 98 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 84 | 98 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 36 | 99 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (35) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's SMR Rating (94) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Price Growth Rating (84) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (98) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's P/E Growth Rating (36) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDC (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDC’s over the last 12 months.
| BGS | DDC | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 76% | 2 days ago 89% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 77% | 3 days ago 76% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 75% | 5 days ago 90% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 69% | 2 days ago 76% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 66% | 2 days ago 90% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 2 days ago 90% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago 65% | 15 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 15 days ago 78% | 5 days ago 90% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 71% | 3 days ago 81% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 70% | 2 days ago 90% |
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is overvalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green while DDC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- DDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDC’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 3 bearish.
- DDC’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а +0.12% price change this week, while DDC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -2.09% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -3.69%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -13.17%, and the average quarterly price growth was -15.60%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGS is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.
DDC is expected to report earnings on Dec 02, 2026.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Major Diversified (-3.69% weekly)Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.
Advertisement
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| AFMC | 40.08 | 0.47 | +1.18% |
| First Trust Active Factor Mid Cap ETF (AFMC) | |||
| DFUV | 55.19 | 0.19 | +0.35% |
| Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF (DFUV) | |||
| MYMI | 23.90 | 0.05 | +0.19% |
| State Street My2029 Municipal Bond ETF (MYMI) | |||
| CLOZ | 26.30 | N/A | N/A |
| Eldridge BBB-B CLO ETF (CLOZ) | |||
| ECNS | 27.63 | -0.10 | -0.36% |
| iShares MSCI China Small-Cap ETF (ECNS) | |||
BGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | 100% | +2.09% | ||
| HAIN - BGS | 41% Loosely correlated | +4.63% | ||
| HLF - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.24% | ||
| HSY - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +1.07% | ||
| MDLZ - BGS | 32% Poorly correlated | -0.10% | ||
| NOMD - BGS | 31% Poorly correlated | +4.65% | ||
More | ||||
DDC and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that DDC and CLNN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDC and CLNN's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To DDC | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| DDC | 100% | +5.41% | ||
| CLNN - DDC | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.47% | ||
| BRLS - DDC | 22% Poorly correlated | -3.62% | ||
| SOWG - DDC | 22% Poorly correlated | -1.09% | ||
| BGS - DDC | 18% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
| NCRA - DDC | 17% Poorly correlated | -5.56% | ||
More | ||||