BGS
Price
$3.78
Change
-$0.11 (-2.83%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
306.81M
37 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
DDC
Price
$0.97
Change
-$0.08 (-7.62%)
Updated
Jun 22 closing price
Capitalization
46.23M
72 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BGS vs DDC

BGS vs DDC Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BGS vs. DDC commentary
Jun 23, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a StrongBuy and DDC is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jun 23, 2026
Stock price -- (BGS: $3.78 vs. DDC: $0.97)
Brand notoriety: BGS and DDC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Food: Major Diversified industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BGS: 116% vs. DDC: 120%
Market capitalization -- BGS: $306.81M vs. DDC: $46.23M
BGS [@Food: Major Diversified] is valued at $306.81M. DDC’s [@Food: Major Diversified] market capitalization is $46.23M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry ranges from $255.67B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Food: Major Diversified] industry is $2.8B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileDDC’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • DDC’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the long-term than DDC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BGS’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while DDC’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BGS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 2 bearish.
  • DDC’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BGS is a better buy in the short-term than DDC.

Price Growth

BGS (@Food: Major Diversified) experienced а -4.79% price change this week, while DDC (@Food: Major Diversified) price change was -11.54% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Major Diversified industry was -1.53%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.18%, and the average quarterly price growth was -10.79%.

Reported Earning Dates

BGS is expected to report earnings on Jul 30, 2026.

DDC is expected to report earnings on Sep 03, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Food: Major Diversified (-1.53% weekly)

Companies in this industry usually make a diverse range of agricultural and/or processed food. Some prominent names in this segment are Mondelez International, which makes chocolates, biscuits, cookies etc. The Kraft Heinz Company specializes in ketchups, sauces, fruit drink pouches and many more. General Mills, Inc. sells flour and cereal. Kellogg is famous for its snacks and breakfast cereal. And so on down the line. As more and more consumers are looking for healthier options in food in recent years, several legacy food companies have responded by revamping brands to include organic and no-added-sugar versions, and/or acquiring healthy food firms, and even streamlining operations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BGS($307M) has a higher market cap than DDC($46.2M). BGS YTD gains are higher at: -8.691 vs. DDC (-52.532). BGS has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 140M vs. DDC (-65.01M). DDC has more cash in the bank: 180M vs. BGS (64.5M). DDC has less debt than BGS: DDC (150M) vs BGS (2.06B). BGS has higher revenues than DDC: BGS (1.81B) vs DDC (262M).
BGSDDCBGS / DDC
Capitalization307M46.2M665%
EBITDA140M-65.01M-215%
Gain YTD-8.691-52.53217%
P/E RatioN/A0.38-
Revenue1.81B262M692%
Total Cash64.5M180M36%
Total Debt2.06B150M1,372%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BGS vs DDC: Fundamental Ratings
BGS
DDC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
556
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9699
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6190
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
5199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a7

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDC (40) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDC’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (100) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's SMR Rating (96) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's Price Growth Rating (61) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as DDC (90) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to DDC’s over the last 12 months.

BGS's P/E Growth Rating (51) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for DDC (99) in the Specialty Stores industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than DDC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BGSDDC
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
66%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
71%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
65%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
66%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
80%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
77%
Bearish Trend 7 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
62%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BGS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
DDC
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FSAVX54.06N/A
N/A
Fidelity Select Automotive Port
VPADX148.71N/A
N/A
Vanguard Pacific Stock Index Admiral
FSTKX39.03N/A
N/A
Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Value Svc
DPWRX65.75N/A
N/A
BNY Mellon Worldwide Growth I
MLPLX7.02N/A
N/A
Invesco SteelPath MLP Alpha Plus A

BGS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with HAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 41% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then HAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BGS
1D Price
Change %
BGS100%
-2.83%
HAIN - BGS
41%
Loosely correlated
+0.25%
HLF - BGS
39%
Loosely correlated
+1.93%
HSY - BGS
35%
Loosely correlated
-1.01%
MDLZ - BGS
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.01%
JBS - BGS
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.08%
More

DDC and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that DDC and CLNN have been poorly correlated (+29% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that DDC and CLNN's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To DDC
1D Price
Change %
DDC100%
-7.32%
CLNN - DDC
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.33%
BRLS - DDC
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SOWG - DDC
22%
Poorly correlated
-20.16%
MKC - DDC
20%
Poorly correlated
-1.95%
BGS - DDC
11%
Poorly correlated
-2.83%
More