BGS vs HLF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BGS is a Sell and HLF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
BGS’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHLF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- BGS’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- HLF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
BGS’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HLF’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
- BGS’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
- HLF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
BGS (@Food: Specialty/Candy) experienced а -4.31% price change this week, while HLF (@Food: Specialty/Candy) price change was -6.82% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Food: Specialty/Candy industry was -1.25%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.01%, and the average quarterly price growth was +3.31%.
Reported Earning Dates
BGS is expected to report earnings on Mar 04, 2025.
HLF is expected to report earnings on Feb 25, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Food: Specialty/Candy (-1.25% weekly)A specialty/candy manufacturer specializes in one or more of the following: chocolate, candies, pasta, condiments, seasonings, among other items. Hershey Company, McCormick & Company and J.M. Smucker Company are some of the major firms in this segment. Demand for this industry’s products comes from both institutions/restaurants as well as households.
| BGS | HLF | BGS / HLF | |
| Capitalization | 899M | 1B | 90% |
| EBITDA | 173M | 482M | 36% |
| Gain YTD | -37.140 | -48.034 | 77% |
| P/E Ratio | 25.71 | 6.42 | 401% |
| Revenue | 2.06B | 5.06B | 41% |
| Total Cash | 41.1M | 575M | 7% |
| Total Debt | 2.12B | 2.77B | 76% |
BGS | HLF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 57 | 41 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 3 Undervalued | 68 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 7 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 89 | 60 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 64 | 30 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
BGS's Valuation (3) in the Food Major Diversified industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HLF (68) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew somewhat faster than HLF’s over the last 12 months.
BGS's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Food Major Diversified industry is in the same range as HLF (100) in the Food Distributors industry. This means that BGS’s stock grew similarly to HLF’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's SMR Rating (7) in the Food Distributors industry is significantly better than the same rating for BGS (91) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew significantly faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's Price Growth Rating (60) in the Food Distributors industry is in the same range as BGS (89) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew similarly to BGS’s over the last 12 months.
HLF's P/E Growth Rating (30) in the Food Distributors industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BGS (64) in the Food Major Diversified industry. This means that HLF’s stock grew somewhat faster than BGS’s over the last 12 months.
| BGS | HLF | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 65% | 3 days ago 79% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | 3 days ago 69% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 77% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 68% | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% | 3 days ago 75% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 67% | 3 days ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago 69% | 7 days ago 68% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago 75% | 24 days ago 80% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 64% | 3 days ago 82% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 68% |
BGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, BGS has been loosely correlated with RKDA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if BGS jumps, then RKDA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BGS | 100% | -1.27% | ||
| RKDA - BGS | 49% Loosely correlated | -24.87% | ||
| BYND - BGS | 41% Loosely correlated | -3.02% | ||
| HLF - BGS | 35% Loosely correlated | +2.85% | ||
| CENTA - BGS | 31% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| NOMD - BGS | 30% Poorly correlated | -1.79% | ||
More | ||||
HLF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HLF has been loosely correlated with USNA. These tickers have moved in lockstep 42% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HLF jumps, then USNA could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HLF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HLF | 100% | +2.85% | ||
| USNA - HLF | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.28% | ||
| CENTA - HLF | 30% Poorly correlated | +0.29% | ||
| CENT - HLF | 27% Poorly correlated | +0.44% | ||
| CAG - HLF | 26% Poorly correlated | -2.73% | ||
| NATR - HLF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||