BHF
Price
$54.16
Change
+$1.67 (+3.18%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.11B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GNW
Price
$9.93
Change
+$0.02 (+0.20%)
Updated
Aug 27 closing price
Capitalization
3.75B
75 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

BHF vs GNW

BHF vs GNW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
BHF vs. GNW commentary
Aug 28, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is BHF is a StrongBuy and GNW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 28, 2026
Stock price -- (BHF: $54.16 vs. GNW: $9.93)
Brand notoriety: BHF: Not notable vs. GNW: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: BHF: 143% vs. GNW: 71%
Market capitalization -- BHF: $3.11B vs. GNW: $3.75B
BHF [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $3.11B. GNW’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.75B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $18.83B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

BHF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileGNW’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • BHF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • GNW’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the long-term than BHF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

BHF’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • BHF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • GNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the short-term than BHF.

Price Growth

BHF (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +1.77% price change this week, while GNW (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +0.71% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +3.51%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.40%, and the average quarterly price growth was +6.35%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHF is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

GNW is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+3.51% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
GNW($3.75B) has a higher market cap than BHF($3.11B). GNW has higher P/E ratio than BHF: GNW (19.47) vs BHF (4.29). GNW YTD gains are higher at: 9.967 vs. BHF (-16.407). BHF has more cash in the bank: 87.4B vs. GNW (8.51B). GNW has less debt than BHF: GNW (1.51B) vs BHF (3.15B). GNW has higher revenues than BHF: GNW (7.07B) vs BHF (5.53B).
BHFGNWBHF / GNW
Capitalization3.11B3.75B83%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-16.4079.967-165%
P/E Ratio4.2919.4722%
Revenue5.53B7.07B78%
Total Cash87.4B8.51B1,027%
Total Debt3.15B1.51B209%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
BHF vs GNW: Fundamental Ratings
BHF
GNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5070
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
34
Fair valued
52
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
695
SMR RATING
1..100
9389
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
6346
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
6933
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

BHF's Valuation (34) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GNW (52). This means that BHF’s stock grew similarly to GNW’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Profit vs Risk Rating (5) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (69). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's SMR Rating (89) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (93). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Price Growth Rating (46) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as BHF (63). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to BHF’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's P/E Growth Rating (33) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for BHF (69). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than BHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
BHFGNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
68%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
79%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
60%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
63%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
64%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
49%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
60%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
70%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
81%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
55%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
BHF
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
AVGX42.903.51
+8.91%
Defiance Daily Target 2X Long AVGO ETF
FNGS80.311.25
+1.58%
MicroSectors™ FANG+™ ETN
SCHK37.200.25
+0.68%
Schwab 1000 ETF
PMNV26.23N/A
N/A
PGIM S&P 500 Max Buffer ETF - November
BAMY27.66-0.02
-0.07%
Brookstone Yield ETF

BHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHF and BHFAO have been poorly correlated (+30% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHF and BHFAO's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHF
1D Price
Change %
BHF100%
+3.18%
BHFAO - BHF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.14%
BHFAP - BHF
26%
Poorly correlated
+0.70%
BHFAN - BHF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.68%
UNM - BHF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.03%
JXN - BHF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.09%
More

GNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNW has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNW jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNW
1D Price
Change %
GNW100%
+0.20%
CNO - GNW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
MET - GNW
49%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
LNC - GNW
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.44%
GL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.13%
PRI - GNW
46%
Loosely correlated
-3.21%
More