AFL
Price
$121.45
Change
+$0.35 (+0.29%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
60.89B
81 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
GNW
Price
$10.16
Change
+$0.17 (+1.70%)
Updated
Aug 14 closing price
Capitalization
3.84B
88 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs GNW

AFL vs GNW Comparison Chart in %
View a ticker or compare two or three
A.I.Advisor
Aug 03, 2026

Which Stock Would AI Choose? Aflac (AFL) vs. Genworth Financial (GNW) Stock Comparison

Key Takeaways

  • AFL has delivered stronger year-to-date and one-year returns compared to GNW, outperforming broader market benchmarks in recent market activity.
  • Both companies operate in the insurance sector, with AFL focusing on supplemental health and life products while GNW emphasizes long-term care and mortgage insurance through its Enact subsidiary.
  • AFL maintains a larger market capitalization and consistent dividend growth track record, whereas GNW offers a smaller-capitalization profile with recent leadership transitions.
  • Upcoming second-quarter earnings releases in early August 2026 for both stocks provide near-term catalysts amid stable sector sentiment.
  • AFL exhibits greater scale and return consistency in recent weeks, while GNW shows potential value characteristics at lower absolute price levels.
  • Relative performance highlights trade-offs between established stability at AFL and higher-beta exposure at GNW.

Introduction

Investors and traders evaluating insurance-sector exposure often compare AFL and GNW to assess differences in scale, business focus, and recent momentum. This comparison is particularly relevant for those seeking established dividend payers alongside smaller-capitalization names with distinct risk profiles. Market participants monitoring supplemental insurance and long-term care segments can use such analysis to understand relative positioning amid evolving economic conditions. The review draws on verifiable performance data and sector developments from recent weeks to provide a balanced perspective.

AFL Overview and Recent Performance

Aflac Incorporated provides supplemental health and life insurance products primarily in the United States and Japan. In recent market activity, AFL shares have traded near record levels around $127, reflecting solid year-to-date returns of approximately 16.8% that exceeded the S&P 500 benchmark. One-year performance has reached roughly 31%, supported by consistent profitability metrics and a long history of dividend increases. Recent sentiment has been influenced by expectations for the upcoming second-quarter earnings release scheduled for August 6, 2026, with analysts projecting earnings per share of $1.77. Broader market activity has favored the stock’s defensive characteristics within the insurance sector.

GNW Overview and Recent Performance

Genworth Financial, Inc. offers long-term care insurance and operates mortgage insurance through its Enact subsidiary. GNW shares have hovered near $9.80–$9.90 in recent weeks, posting year-to-date gains of about 10.1% and one-year returns near 22.6%. The company maintains a smaller market capitalization around $3.8 billion. Recent developments include a temporary leadership change, with the president and chief executive officer taking a leave of absence and the chief financial officer serving as interim leader. Sentiment has been shaped by preparations for second-quarter results expected around August 5–6, 2026, alongside ongoing capital management initiatives.

Trending AI Robots

Tickeron maintains a curated section of its platform dedicated to trending AI trading bots, accessible via the Trending AI Robots page. The platform offers hundreds of AI-powered trading bots that execute strategies across thousands of tickers, employing varied approaches including different timeframes, risk parameters, and performance statistics. Only those bots demonstrating the strongest alignment with prevailing market conditions are featured in the trending section. Available bots display ranges of historical win rates, average returns, and drawdown metrics that allow users to evaluate suitability. All AI trading bots feature unique trading styles, strategies, timeframes, performances, statistics, and sets of tickers they trade. Readers interested in exploring these tools may visit the Trending AI Robots page for additional details.

Head-to-Head Comparison

AFL operates at significantly larger scale with a market capitalization exceeding $60 billion, delivering more consistent total returns and a proven dividend growth record. In contrast, GNW represents a smaller-capitalization opportunity with greater sensitivity to sector-specific catalysts and recent management adjustments. Growth drivers for AFL center on premium growth in supplemental products, while GNW relies on contributions from its mortgage insurance unit alongside legacy long-term care operations. Recent momentum has favored AFL’s outperformance relative to benchmarks, whereas GNW has shown steadier but more modest gains. Risk factors include earnings volatility for both, with GNW carrying additional exposure from leadership transitions. Sector exposure remains similar within insurance, though market sentiment has reflected greater stability around the larger AFL name in recent market activity.

Tickeron AI Verdict

Based on observable factors such as trend consistency, scale, and relative positioning in recent market activity, Tickeron’s AI would currently assign higher probabilistic favorability to AFL. The stock’s stronger benchmark outperformance and established operational stability provide measurable advantages in current conditions. GNW presents a higher-beta alternative with potential for differentiated returns but faces greater near-term uncertainty from leadership dynamics. This assessment reflects data-driven pattern recognition rather than definitive forecasts.

Disclaimer

The information on this webpage is provided for general informational and educational purposes only and is not intended as investment advice, a recommendation to purchase or sell any security, or an offer or solicitation related to investments. It does not consider your personal financial situation, goals, or risk profile, and all investing carries inherent risks, including the possibility of losing your entire investment. For more details, please review our full disclaimer.

Disclaimers and Limitations

VS
AFL vs. GNW commentary
Aug 15, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a Hold and GNW is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 15, 2026
Stock price -- (AFL: $121.45 vs. GNW: $10.16)
Brand notoriety: AFL: Not notable vs. GNW: Notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 63% vs. GNW: 60%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $60.89B vs. GNW: $3.84B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $60.89B. GNW’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $3.84B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $154.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $19.3B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileGNW’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • GNW’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, GNW is a better buy in the long-term than AFL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while GNW’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • GNW’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the short-term than GNW.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а -2.54% price change this week, while GNW (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was +4.85% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was -0.67%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.68%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.70%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Nov 04, 2026.

GNW is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (-0.67% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($60.9B) has a higher market cap than GNW($3.84B). GNW has higher P/E ratio than AFL: GNW (19.92) vs AFL (13.10). GNW YTD gains are higher at: 12.514 vs. AFL (11.297). AFL has more cash in the bank: 71.5B vs. GNW (8.51B). GNW has less debt than AFL: GNW (1.51B) vs AFL (7.91B). AFL has higher revenues than GNW: AFL (18.3B) vs GNW (7.07B).
AFLGNWAFL / GNW
Capitalization60.9B3.84B1,586%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD11.29712.51490%
P/E Ratio13.1019.9266%
Revenue18.3B7.07B259%
Total Cash71.5B8.51B840%
Total Debt7.91B1.51B524%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs GNW: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
GNW
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
8180
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
66
Overvalued
54
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
35
SMR RATING
1..100
7091
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5148
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9135
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

GNW's Valuation (54) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (66). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GNW (5). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to GNW’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (70) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as GNW (91). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to GNW’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's Price Growth Rating (48) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as AFL (51). This means that GNW’s stock grew similarly to AFL’s over the last 12 months.

GNW's P/E Growth Rating (35) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (91). This means that GNW’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLGNW
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
32%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
58%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
42%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
54%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 18 days ago
67%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
59%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
66%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
GNW
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FNY107.740.55
+0.51%
First Trust Mid Cap Growth AlphaDEX® ETF
FFLS24.080.04
+0.16%
Future Fund Long/Short ETF
RFDI92.690.08
+0.09%
First Trust RiverFront Dyn Dev Intl ETF
FPXE34.32-0.04
-0.13%
First Trust IPOX Europe Equity Opps ETF
URA44.93-0.32
-0.71%
Global X Uranium ETF

AFL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFL has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 65% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFL jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFL
1D Price
Change %
AFL100%
+0.29%
CNO - AFL
65%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
PRI - AFL
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
MET - AFL
46%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
UNM - AFL
45%
Loosely correlated
+0.68%
GNW - AFL
44%
Loosely correlated
+1.70%
More

GNW and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, GNW has been loosely correlated with CNO. These tickers have moved in lockstep 60% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if GNW jumps, then CNO could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To GNW
1D Price
Change %
GNW100%
+1.70%
CNO - GNW
60%
Loosely correlated
+0.78%
MET - GNW
50%
Loosely correlated
+0.19%
LNC - GNW
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.40%
AFL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.29%
GL - GNW
47%
Loosely correlated
+0.18%
More